Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Geri Dönüşüm Davranışlarının Belirleyicilerinin İncelenmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 31 Issue: 56, 129 - 149, 28.04.2023

Açelya Gizem Öktem Shihomi Ara Aksoy Selcen Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.02.06

Abstract

Çevreye yayılan atıklar insan ve diğer tüm canlıların sağlığını olumsuz etkilemektedir. Her birey, üretilen atıkların doğru değerlendirilmesinin sorumluluğuna sahiptir. Bu çalışmada öğrencilerin geri dönüşüm davranışlarının belirleyicileri Planlı Davranış Teorisi baz alınarak ve Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli kullanılarak tanımlanmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, öznel norm ve algılanan davranış kontrolü öğrencilerin geri dönüşüm davranışları üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı bir etkiye sahiptir. Araştırmanın bir diğer bulgusu ise, niyet öznel norm ve algılanan davranış kontrolü arasında parçalı bir aracılık etkisine sahiptir.

Keywords

Kentsel Katı Atık, Öznel Norm, Algılanan Davranış Kontrolü, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli

Investigating the Determinants of University Students’ Recycling Behaviour

Abstract

Wastes spread to the environment negatively affect the health of humans and all other creatures. It is the responsibility of each person to assess the waste generated correctly. Recycling is an applicable option for environmental protection. This study defines university students' recycling behaviours based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour using Structural Equation Modelling. The results of the study, it is found that subjective norms and perceived behaviour control have a significant impact on students' recycling behaviour. Furthermore, intention partially mediates the positive relationship between subjective norm and recycling behaviour and between perceived behavioural control and recycling behaviour.

Keywords

Municipal Solid Waste, Subjective Norm, Perceived Behavioural Control, Structural Equation Modelling

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• Banar, M. & A. Ozkan (2005), “Kampüs Katı Atıklarinin Karakterizasyonu ve Geri Kazanımı: Anadolu Üniversitesi Örneği”, Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 225-234.
• Bosnjak, M. et al. (2020), “The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected Recent Advances and Applications”, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352-356.
• Chan, L. & B. Bishop (2013), “A Moral Basis for Recycling: Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 96-102.
• Cosic, A. et al. (2018), “Can Nudges Affect Students' Green Behaviour? A Field Experiment”, Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 107-111.
• Davies, J. et al. (2002), “Beyond the Intention-Behaviour Mythology: An Integrated Model of Recycling”, Marketing Theory, 2(1), 29-113.
• Ewijk, S. & J.A. Stegemann (2016), “Limitations of the Waste Hierarchy for Achieving Absolute Reductions in Material Throughput”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (132), 122-128.
• Fan, B. et al. (2019), “A Comparison Study of 'Motivation-Intention-Behavior' Model on Household Solid Waste Sorting in China and Singapore”, Journal of Cleaner Production, (211), 442-454.
• Fu, L. et al. (2018), “Pro-Environmental Awareness and Behaviors on Campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427-445.
• Hair, J.F. et al. (2014.), Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Education Limited, Seventh Edition.
• Hernandez, L.M. et al. (2017), “Are There Nanoplastics in your Personal Care Products?”, Environmental Science and Technology Letters, 4(7), 280-285.
• Ho, W.S. et al. (2017), “Waste Management Pinch Analysis (WAMPA): Application of Pinch Analysis for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Reduction in Municipal Solid Waste Management”, Applied Energy, 185, 1481-1489.
• Kartal, M. & S. Bardakçı (2018), SPSS ve AMOS Uygulamalı Örneklerle Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik Analizleri, Akademisyen Kitabevi, Ankara.
• Klöckner, C.A. (2013), “A Comprehensive Model of the Psychology of Environmental Behaviour-a Meta-Analysis”, Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028-1038.
• Latif, S.A. et al. (2012), “Environmental Problems and Quality of Life: Situational Factor as a Predictor of Recycling Behaviour”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, 682-688.
• Linder, N. et al. (2018), “Using Behavioural Insights to Promote Food Waste Recycling in Urban Households-Evidence from a Longitudinal Field Experiment”, Frontiers in Psychology, (9), 1-13.
• Mamun, A. et al. (2018), “Recycling Intention and Behavior among Low-income Households”, Sustainability, 10(7), 1-22.
• Mamun, A. et al. (2019), “Recycling Intentions and Behaviors among Informal Micro-Entrepreneurs in Kelantan, Malaysia”, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(2), 123-138.
• Meng, X. et al. (2019), “Investigation on Decision-Making Mechanism of Residents' Household Solid Waste Classification and Recycling Behaviors”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 224-234.
• Nachtigall, C. et al. (2003), “(Why) Should We Use SEM? Pros and Cons of Structural Equation Modeling”, Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 1-22.
• Nguyen, H.T.T. et al. (2018), “Determinants of Residents' E-Waste Recycling Behavioral Intention: A Case Study from Vietnam”, Sustainability, 11(1), 164.
• OECD (2020a), Municipal Waste Database, <https://data.oecd.org/waste/municipal-waste.htm>, 02.03.2022.
• OECD (2020b), Environment at a Glance 2020 Report, OECD Publishing, Paris.
• Pathak, P. et al. (2018), “Solid Waste Management”, IJTSRD, 2(4), 1666-1669.
• Paul, J. et al. (2016), “Predicting Green Product Consumption using Theory of Planned Behavior and Reasoned Action”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123-134.
• Priviteria, G. & F. Zuraikat (2014), “Proximity of Foods in a Competitive Food Environment Influences Consumption of a Low Calorie and a High Calorie Food”, Appetite, 76, 175-179.
• Razali, F. et al. (2020), “Waste Separation at Source Behaviour among Malaysian Households: The Theory of Planned Behaviour with Moral Norm”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 271(2), 122025.
• Sabri, M.F. et al. (2019), “The Mediation Effect of Intention in the Pro-Environmental Workplace (Pew) Behavior of Malaysian Public Employees”, Management Science Letters, 9(10), 1567-1576.
• Salleh, M.F.M. et al. (2016), “Secondary School Students' Knowledge and Awareness on Environmental Issues”, in: 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings (563-577).
• Tan, T.H. (2013), “Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Predict the Intention to Purchase Green and Sustainable Homes in Malaysia”, Asian Social Science, 9(10), 181-191.
• Thaler, R. & C. Sunstein (2017), Dürtme: Sağlık, Zenginlik ve Mutlulukla İlgili Kararları Uygulamak, (Çev. E. Günsel), Pegasus Yayınları, 4. Baskı, İstanbul.
• Tonglet, M. et al. (2004), “Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Investigate the Determinants of Recycling Behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(3), 191-214.
• United Nations Environment Programme GRID-Arendal and Behavioural Insights Team (2020), The Little Book of Green Nudges, Nairobi and Arendal: UNEP and GRID-Arendal.
• Wang, H. et al. (2020), “Key Factors Influencing Public Awareness of Household Solid Waste Recycling in Urban Areas of China: A Case Study”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104813.
• Wang, Q. et al. (2021), “Intention in Use Recyclable Express Packaging in Consumers' Behavior: An Empirical Study”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105115.
• World Bank (2018), What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC.
• Zhang, B. et al. (2019), “From Intention to Action: How Do Personal Attitudes, Facilities Accessibility, and Government Stimulus Matter for Household Waste Sorting?”, Journal of Environmental Management, 233, 447-458.
• Zhang, D. et al. (2015), “Residents' Waste Separation Behaviors at the Source: Using SEM with the Theory of Planned Behavior in Guangzhou, China”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(8), 9475-9491.