VOSVIEWER İLE YERİNDE YAŞLANMA ÇALIŞMALARININ BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ: MEVCUT DURUM VE EĞİLİMLER

Abstract

Yerinde yaşlanma, yaşlı bireylerin kendi evlerinde veya tanıdıkları çevrede bağımsız olarak yaşamlarını sürdürebilmelerini ifade eder. Son yıllarda yerinde yaşlanma konusunda yapılan araştırmalar hızla artmıştır. Bu çalışma, yerinde yaşlanma ile ilgili bilimsel araştırmaları inceleyerek, gelecekte bu alanda yapılacak araştırmalara yol gösterecek öncelikli konuları belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında, 1984-2024 yılları arasında Web of Science veri tabanında yerinde yaşlanma ile ilgili yayımlanmış 2937 çalışma bibliyometrik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizi, haritalaması ve ağ görselleştirmesi için VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılmıştır. Bu analizde bilimsel makaleler, yazarlar, ülkeler, kurumlar ve anahtar kelimeler gibi bilgiler değerlendirilmiş, sonuçlar ise VOSviewer adlı yazılım kullanılarak haritalama ve ağ görselleştirme teknikleri ile ortaya konmuştur. Yapılan analizde en çok makale (n= 2153) türünde yayın yer almaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, özellikle 2012 yılından sonra yayın sayısının belirgin bir şekilde arttığı görülmektedir. Bu konuda en çok yayın yapan araştırmacı Skubic, M. (n= 21) olurken, en aktif kurum Missouri Üniversitesi ve en fazla yayına sahip ülke ise ABD (n= 1118) olmuştur. Yerinde yaşlanmayla birlikte sıkça kullanılan anahtar kelimelerin “older adults (yaşlı yetişkinler)”, “aging (yaşlanma)”, “older people (yaşlı insanlar)”, “dementia (demans)”, “housing (konut)”, “technology (teknoloji)”, “elderly (yaşlı)” ve “long-term care (uzun süreli bakım)” olduğu görülmüştür. Çalışma, yerinde yaşlanma alanındaki araştırmacılara rehberlik ederek, gelecekteki iş birliği alanlarını belirlemekte ve araştırma eğilimlerini anlamaya katkı sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Yerinde yaşlanma
• yaşlı
• Bibliyometrik analiz
• VOSviewer

Supporting Institution

YOKTUR.

Ethical Statement

BU ÇALIŞMA ETİK KURUL ONAYI GEREKTİRMEMEKTEDİR.

Thanks

YOKTUR.

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF STUDIES ON AGEING IN PLACE WITH VOSVIEWER: CURRENT STATUS AND TRENDS

Abstract

Ageing in place refers to the ability of elderly individuals to live independently in their own homes or in familiar surroundings. In recent years, research on ageing in place has increased rapidly. This study aims to examine scientific research on aging in place and to identify priority topics that will guide future research in this field. Within the scope of the study, 2937 studies on aging in place published in the Web of Science database between 1984 and 2024 were analysed bibliometrically. VOSviewer software was used for data analysis, mapping and network visualisation. In this analysis, information such as scientific articles, authors, countries, institutions and keywords were evaluated, and the results were presented with mapping and network visualisation techniques using VOSviewer software. In the analysis, the most common type of publication is article (n= 2153). As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the number of publications has increased significantly especially after 2012. Skubic, M. (n= 21) was the researcher with the most publications on this subject, while the most active institution was the University of Missouri and the country with the most publications was the USA (n= 1118). It was observed that the keywords frequently used with ageing in place were ‘older adults’, ‘aging’, ‘older people’, ‘dementia’, ‘housing’, ‘technology’, ‘elderly’ and ‘long-term care’. The study provides guidance to researchers in the field of ageing in place, identifies future areas of collaboration and contributes to understanding research trends.

Keywords

• Ageing in place
• elderly
• Bibliometric analysis
• VOSviewer

References

1. Ahn, M. (2017). Introduction to special issue: aging in place. Housing and Society, 44(1–2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2017.1398450
2. Akbayrak, E., Aysan, Ü. (2022). Yaşlı Perspektifiyle Yerinde ve Başarılı Yaşlanma. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 22(55), 399-427. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.1053840
3. Arthanat, S., Chang, H. ve Wilcox, J. (2020). Determinants of information communication and smart home automation technology adoption for aging-in-place. Journal Of Enabling Technologies, 14(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/jet-11-2019-0050
4. Brim, B., Fromhold, S. ve Blaney, S. (2021). Older adults' self-reported barriers to aging in place. Journal of Applied Gerontology: the Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 40(12), 1678–1686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820988800
5. Byrnes, M., Lichtenberg, P. A. ve Lysack, C. (2006). Environmental Press, Aging in Place, and Residential Satisfaction of Urban Older Adults. Journal of Applied Sociology, os-23(2), 50-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244062300204
6. Chui, E. (2008). Ageing in place in Hong Kong—challenges and opportunities in a capitalist chinese city. Ageing International, 32, 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-008-9015-2
7. Cui, Y., Liu, Y. ve Mou, J. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of organisational culture using CiteSpace. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 21(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v21i1.2030
8. Darko, A., Chan, A. P., Huo, X. ve Owusu-Manu, D. G. (2019). A scientometric analysis and visualization of global green building research. Building and Environment, 149, 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.059

9. Demirkan, H. (2007). Housing for the aging population. European Review of Aging And Physical Activity, 4, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11556-007-0016-z
10. Esendemir, Ş. (2016). Türkiye’de Yerinde Yaşlanma ve Mekan Gerontolojisinin Temel Paremetreleri. İstanbul University Journal of Sociology, 36(2), 411-429. DOI :10.16917/iusosyoloji.284544
11. Ewen, H. H., Emerson, K. G., Washington, T. R., Carswell, A. T. ve Smith, M. L. (2017). Aging in place: Community-Based Services and Resources in Residential Settings Among Older Adults. Housing and Society, 44(1–2), 114–126. DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2017.1389577
12. Fonseca, B. D. P. F. E., Sampaio, R. B., Fonseca, M. V. D. A., & Zicker, F. (2016). Co-authorship network analysis in health research: method and potential use. Health Research Policy and Systems, 14, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0104-5
13. Gandia, R. M., Antonialli, F., Cavazza, B. H., Neto, A. M., Lima, D. A. D., Sugano, J. Y., ... ve Zambalde, A. L. (2019). Autonomous vehicles: scientometric and bibliometric review. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1518937
14. Glänzel, W. ve Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; ss. 257–276.
15. Hosseini, M. R., Martek, I., Zavadskas, E. K., Aibinu, A. A., Arashpour, M. ve Chileshe, N. (2018). Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis. Automation in Construction, 87, 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.002
16. Giacalone, D., Wendin, K., Kremer, S., Frøst, M. B., Bredie, W. L. P., Olsson, V., Otto, M. H., Skjoldborg, S., Lindberg, U. ve Risvik, E. (2016). Health and quality of life in an aging population - food and beyond. Food Quality and Preference, 47, 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.12.002
17. Kalınkara, V., Arpacı, F. (2013). Yerinde Yaşlanma. VII.Ulusal Yaşlılık Kongresi. Karabük (s.54-60).
18. Kalınkara, V., Arpacı, F. (2016). Yerinde Yaşlanma. Kalınkara, V. (Ed.), Yaşlılık Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşım, Sorunlar, Çözümler (s. 399-422). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
19. Kalınkara, V., Kapıkıran, Ş. (2017). Yerinde yaşlanma ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özellikleri. Yaşlı Sorunları Araştırma Dergisi, 10(2), 54-66.
20. Lewis, C. ve Buffel, T. (2020). Aging in place and the places of aging: A longitudinal study. Journal of aging studies, 54, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100870
21. Marek, K. D., Rantz, M. J. (2000). Aging in place: a new model for long-term care. Nursing administration quarterly, 24(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006216-200004000-00003
22. Martin, D., Long, O., Kessler, L. (2019). Planning for aging in place: ıncorporating the voice of elders to promote quality of life. Journal of Housing For the Elderly, 33(4), 382–392. 10.1080/02763893.2019.1593280
23. Oladinrin, O., Gomis, K., Jayantha, W. M., Obi, L. ve Rana, M. Q. (2021). Scientometric analysis of global scientific literature on aging in place. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12468. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312468
24. Öğüt, S., Öğüt Düzen, K., Polat, M. (2017). Huzurevlerinde Yaşayan Yaşlıların Yerinde Yaşlanma Konusundaki Duygu ve Düşünceleri. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(1), 522-526.
25. Özmete, E. (2019). Yeni Yüzyılda Yaşlanma İçin Gündem: Temel Kavramlar ve Yaklaşımlar. Yanardağ, U., Zubaroğlu Yanardağ, M. (Ed.), Yaşlılık ve Sosyal Hizmet (s. 11-29). Ankara: Nika Yayınevi.
26. Özmete, E., Dinç, B. (2020). Yaşlıların “Göç” ve “Yerinde Yaşlanma” Bağlamında Kentsel Dönüşüm ile İlgili Değerlendirmeleri. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 20(46), 197-234. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v20i54504.660460
27. Puckett, J. (2011). Zotero: A guide for librarians, researchers, and educators. Assoc of Cllge & Rsrch Libr.
28. Pynoos, J., Mnishita, C., Cicero, C. (2008). Aging in place, housing, and the law. The Elder Law Journal, 16(1).
29. Pynoos, J., Caraviello, R. ve Cicero, C. (2009). Lifelong housing: the anchor in aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 26-32.
30. Ramos-Rodríguez ve Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
31. Ratnayake, M., LPCMH, ATR, NCC;1, Lukas, S., Brathwaite, S., Neave, J., Henry, H. ve BS-c;5 (2022). Aging in Place:: Are We Prepared?. Delaware journal of public health, 8(3), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2022.08.007
32. Riekkola, J., Isaksson, G., Lilja, M., & Rutberg, S. (2024). 'Possibilities and challenges for older couples to continue ageing in place'. Journal of aging studies, 69, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101229
33. Robinson-Lane, S. G., Johnson, F. U., Tuyisenge, M. J., Kirch, M., Christensen, L. L., Malani, P. N., Solway, E., Singer, D. C., Kullgren, J. T. ve Koumpias, A. M. (2023). Racial and ethnic variances in preparedness for aging in place among US adults ages 50-80. Geriatric Nursing, 54, 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.09.010
34. Rogers, W. A., Ramadhani, W. A. ve Harris, M. T. (2020). Defining Aging in Place: The Intersectionality of Space, Person, and Time. Innovation in Aging, 4(4), igaa036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa036
35. Saunders, M.; Lewis, P ve Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed.; Pearson: Harlow, UK.
36. Sweileh, W. M., Al-Jabi, S. W., AbuTaha, A. S., Zyoud, S. E. H., Anayah, F. M. ve Sawalha, A. F. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of worldwide scientific literature in mobile-health: 2006–2016. BMC Medical İnformatics And Decision Making, 17, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0476-7
37. Şenel, E. ve Demir, E. (2018). Bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the articles published in the journal of religion and health between 1975 and 2016. Journal of Religion and Health, 57, 1473-1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-017-0539-1
38. Tenenbaum, L. (2010). The MetLife Report on Aging in Place 2.0: Rethinking Solutions to the Home Care Challenge. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. New York.
39. Thanuskodi, S. (2010). Journal of Social Sciences: A bibliometric study. Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 77-80. DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2010.11892847
40. Timmermann, S. (2012). To “Age in Place” or Not… That Is the Question. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 66(1), 24–26.
41. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. ve Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
42. Tural E., Lu D. ve Austin Cole D. (2021). Safely and actively aging in place: older adults’ attitudes and ıntentions toward smart home technologies. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214211017340
43. TÜİK. (2024). İstatistiklerle Yaşlılar, 2023. Erişim Tarihi: 02.07.2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Istatistiklerle-Yaslilar-2023-53710
44. Valderrama-Zurián, J. C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D. ve Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 570-576. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.002
45. Van Eck, N. ve Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
46. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2011). VOSviewer manual. Univeristeit Leiden: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2013, 1.
47. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (ss. 285-320). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
48. Van Eck, N.J. ve Waltman, L. (2016). VosViewer Manual: Manual for VosViewer Version 1.6.5. CWTS: Leiden, The Netherlands.
49. Van Eck, N. J. ve Waltman, L. (2019). Accuracy of citation data in Web of Science and Scopus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07011. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.07011
50. Vasunilashorn, S., Steinman, B. A., Liebig, P. S. ve Pynoos, J. (2012). Aging in place: evolution of a research topic whose time has come. Journal of aging research, 2012, 120952. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/120952
51. Versey, H. S., Murad, S., Willems, P. ve Sanni, M. (2019). Beyond housing: Perceptions of indirect displacement, displacement risk, and aging precarity as challenges to aging in place in gentrifying cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234633.
52. Wagner, A. (2021). Aging in place with age-related cognitive changes: The impact of caregiving support and finances. Societies, 11(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020031
53. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J. ve Allen, R. E. (2012). The meaning of "aging in place" to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
54. World Health Organization (WHO). (2004). A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons. Erişim Tarihi: 31.07.2024. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/68896.
55. World Health Organization (WHO). (2007). Global age-friendly cities: a guide. Erişim Tarihi: 30.07.2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547307.
56. World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Concept Note: International Technical Meeting Agıng In Place. Erişim Tarihi: 30.07.2024. https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Concept-note.pdf
57. World Health Organization (WHO) (2014). “Ageing well” must be a global priority. Erişim Tarihi: 31.07.2024. https://www.who.int/news/item/06-11-2014–ageing-well-must-be-a-global-priority.
58. World Health Organization (WHO) (2024). Ageing. Erişim Tarihi: 02.07.2024. https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1.
59. Wuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q. ve Osei-Kyei, R. (2019). Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy And Buildings, 190, 69-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.010
60. Zotero (7.0). (n.d.). [Zotero 7 for Windows]. George Mason University; Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. https://www.zotero.org/about/