KADINA YÖNELİK DİJİTAL ŞİDDETİN KAVRAMSAL ÇERÇEVESİ VE YANSIMALARI: ALANYAZIN ÇALIŞMALARI ÜZERİNE BİBLİYOMETRİK VE TEMATİK BİR İNCELEME

Öz

Bu çalışmada, kadına yönelik dijital şiddet literatürünü sistematik ve kapsamlı olarak incelemek amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz ve içerik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk aşamada, Web of Science veri tabanından elde edilen yayınlar VOSviewer yazılımı ile analiz edilerek çalışmalardaki ülke dağılımı, yazar işbirlikleri ve anahtar kavramlar değerlendirilmiş; alanın tematik kümeleri ve kavramsal yapısı ortaya konmuştur. İkinci aşamada, 2015–2025 mayıs ayı arasında Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanan açık erişimli, örneklemi yalnızca yetişkin kadınlardan oluşan 32 araştırma makalesi analiz edilmiştir. MAXQDA 2022 kullanılarak yürütülen kodlama sürecinde 187 kod üretilmiş; bu kodlar birlikte oluşum modelleri ve kavramsal haritalar (MAXMAPs) aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Bu çift yönlü yöntem, dijital şiddetin yapısal eğilimleri ile kadınların deneyimlerinden elde edilen tematik örüntüleri bütüncül biçimde değerlendirme olanağı sunmuştur. Ardından içerik analizi ile çalışmaların kavramsal çerçevesi, bulguları ve önerileri sistematik olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, dijital şiddetin kadınlar-erkekler arasındaki eşitsizlikler bağlamında çok katmanlı bir olgu olduğunu, ruh sağlığı, mesleki yaşam ve sosyal görünürlük üzerinde kalıcı etkiler yarattığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, kadınların dijital şiddet karşısında geliştirdiği bireysel ve kolektif başa çıkma stratejileri ile dijital dayanışma pratiklerinin önemi vurgulanmıştır. Çalışma, dijital şiddet literatüründeki kavramsal çeşitliliği ve araştırma eğilimlerini görünür kılarak alanyazına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• kadına yönelik dijital şiddet
• dijital şiddet
• çevrim içi şiddet
• kadın çalışmaları
• kadın-erkek eşitsizliği

THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND REFLECTIONS OF DIGITAL VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: A BIBLIOMETRIC AND THEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Öz

This study conducted a bibliometric and content analysis to systematically and comprehensively examine the literature on digital violence against women. In the first phase, publications retrieved from the Web of Science database were analyzed using VOSviewer software to evaluate country distribution, author collaborations, and key concepts, thereby identifying thematic clusters and the conceptual structure of the field. In the second stage, 32 open access research articles published in the Web of Science database between May 2015 and 2025, with a sample of only adult women, were analyzed. Using MAXQDA 2022, a total of 187 codes were generated, which were examined through code co-occurrence models and conceptual mapping (MAXMAPs). This dual-method approach enabled a holistic evaluation of both the structural trends in the literature and the thematic patterns derived from women’s lived experiences. Subsequently, content analysis was used to systematically classify the conceptual frameworks, findings, and recommendations of the studies. The findings indicate that digital violence is a multilayered phenomenon rooted in inequality between women and men, producing lasting impacts on mental health, professional life, and social visibility. Furthermore, the study highlights the significance of both individual and collective coping strategies developed by women, as well as practices of digital solidarity. By making visible the conceptual diversity and research trends in the literature on digital violence, the study aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• digital violence against women
• women's studies
• digital violence
• online violence
• inequality between women and men

Kaynakça

1. Adams, C. (2018). “They Go for Gender First” The nature and effect of sexist abuse of female technology journalists. Journalism Practice, 12(7), 850-869.
2. Afrouz, R., and Vassos, S. (2024). Adolescents’ experiences of cyber-dating abuse and the pattern of abuse through technology: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 25, 2814–2828. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241227457
3. Agueli, B., Esposito, C., Carnevale, S., Arcidiacono, C., and Di Napoli, I. (2024). Bridging real and virtual: An ecological approach to prevent cyberviolence against women. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70010
4. Al Doghan, M. A., and Arshad, S. (2023). Cyberbullying and psychological stress among female employees. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(1), 166–184.
5. Alsawalqa, R. O. (2021a). Cyberbullying and academic performance: A study among university students. Heliyon, 7(3), e06439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06439
6. Alsawalqa, R. O. (2021b). Evaluating female experiences of electronic dating violence in Jordan: Motivations, consequences, and coping strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 719702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719702
7. Andrade, T., Sampaio, M., Donard, V., and Moraes, P. (2023). Digital violence in teen dating: An ecological engagement methodology. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9304202300000049-en
8. Baloch, M., Yasir, A., and Ab ul Hassan, A. (2025). Cyberbullying and feminism in Pakistan: The stories of feminist activists in Lahore. Gender, Place and Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2025.2468916

9. Bansal, S., Meena, P. S., and Prasad, S. (2023). Technology-facilitated gender-based violence: A review of emerging evidence and responses in Asia. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 7(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16753551361153
10. Bates, S. (2016). Revenge porn and mental health: A qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology, 12(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116654565
11. Benítez-Hidalgo, V., Henares-Montiel, J., Ruiz-Pérez, I., and Pastor-Moreno, G. (2024). International Prevalence of Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Against Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.. Trauma, violence and abuse, 15248380241286813. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241286813
12. Brazal, A. M. (2020). Intersections of gender-based violence and digital technology: Online abuse of women. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 26(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2020.1796183
13. Broadus, R. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
14. Bulut, E., ve Can, B. (2023). Networked misogyny beyond the digital: The violent devaluation of women journalists’ labor and bodies in Turkey’s masculine authoritarian regime. Feminist Media Studies, 24, 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2219861
15. Bussu, A., Pulina, M., Ashton, S., Mangiarulo, M., and Molloy, E. (2024). Cyberbullying and cyberstalking victimisation among university students: A narrative systematic review. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/02697580241257217
16. Canadian Department of Justice. (2015). Protecting Canadians from Online Crime Act. Erişim Tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2025, https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/cyber.html
17. Chikwe, C., Eneh, N., and Akpuokwe, C. (2024). Conceptual framework for global protection against technology-enabled violence against women and girls. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.2.0415
18. Cote, A. C. (2015). “I can defend myself”: Women’s strategies for coping with harassment while gaming online. Games and Culture, 12(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015587603
19. Cripps, J., and Stermac, L. (2018). Cyber-sexual violence and negative emotional states among women in a Canadian university. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12(1), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1402295
20. Daniels, G., and Skinner, K. (2023). Book notes: Screen Damage: The Dangers of Digital Media for Children by Michel Desmurget. European Journal of Communication, 38, 109 - 110. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221150126
21. Dannisworo, C. A., Buchari, A. H., and Oriza, I. I. D. (2022). Testing the investment model to predict commitment in cyber dating abuse victims. Partner Abuse, 13(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2021-0012
22. Dehingia, N., McAuley, J., McDougal, L., Reed, E., Silverman, J. G., Urada, L., and Raj, A. (2023). Violence against women on Twitter in India: Testing a taxonomy for online misogyny and measuring its prevalence during COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0292121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292121
23. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., and Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
24. Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., and Harris, B. (2018). Technology-facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
25. Duman, M. (2023). Digital violence and women: Systematization of researchs and suggestions for future research. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1187094
26. Eckert, S. (2018). Fighting for recognition: Online abuse of women bloggers in Germany, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. New Media and Society, 20(4), 1282-1302.
27. Esposito, E., and Breeze, R. (2022). Gender and politics in a digitalised world: Investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse and Society, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076608
28. Fileborn, B., and Loney-Howes, R. (2018). Using social media to resist gender violence—A global perspective. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Erişim Tarihi: 15 Mayıs 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.613
29. Fontana, M., Montobbio, F., and Racca, P. (2019). Topics and Geographical Diffusion of Knowledge in Top Economic Journals. Macroeconomics: National Income and Product Accounts eJournal. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12815
30. Fox, J., and Tang, W. Y. (2016). Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: Rumination, organizational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New media and society, 19(8), 1290-1307.
31. FRA. (2021). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Erişim Tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2025, https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2021/violence-against-women
32. Fulu, E., and Miedema, S. (2015). Violence Against Women. Violence against Women, 21, 1431 - 1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215596244
33. Gümüş, B. (2023). The Transformation of LGBTQ+ Relationships in Turkey from Digital Dating to Digital Violence. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00663-y
34. Harris, B., and Woodlock, D. (2018). Digital Coercive Control: Insights From Two Landmark Domestic Violence Studies. The British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/BJC/AZY052
35. Heise, L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290.
36. Heldt, A. (2019). Reading between the lines and the numbers: An analysis of the first NetzDG reports. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1413
37. Henry, N., and Flynn, A. (2019). Image-based sexual abuse: Online distribution channels and illicit communities of support. Violence against women, 25(16), 1932-1955.
38. Henry, N., and Powell, A. (2018). Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 19, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
39. Henry, N., Powell, A., and Flynn, A. (2020). Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of non-consensual sharing of intimate images. Violence Against Women, 26(15–16), 1828–1850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801219875821
40. Hill, C., and Johnson, H. (2019). Online interpersonal victimization as a mechanism of social control of women: An empirical examination. Violence against women, 26(12-13), 1681-1700.
41. Ho, M., Gupta, S., Lee, J., Wadhwa, B., and Fu, X. (2024). Detrimental to Our Digital Well-Being: Campus Sexual Misconduct and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence Among University Students in Singapore.. Violence against women, 10778012241283498. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241283498
42. Hyk, V., Vysochan, O., and Vysochan, O. (2022). Integrated Reporting of Mining Enterprises: Bibliometric Analysis. Studies in Business and Economics, 17, 90 - 99. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2022-0048
43. Iqbal, I., Chinnasamy, S., and Faizal, S. B. (2024). Guardians of truth, targets of harassment: The untold stories of workplace harassment among Pakistani female journalists. Journal of Media and Information Warfare, 17(1), 18–27. https://jmiw.uitm.edu.my/images/Journal/Vol17No1/Article_2.pdf
44. İri, R., ve Ünal, E. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis Bibliometric Analysis of Research (1980-2023). Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1446738
45. Jackson, S. J., and Banaszczyk, S. (2016). Digital standpoints: Debating gendered violence and racial exclusions in the feminist counterpublic. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 40(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859916667731
46. Jane, E. A. (2018). Gendered cyberhate as workplace harassment and economic vandalism. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344
47. Kabiri, S., Choi, J., Shadmanfaat, S. M., and Lee, J. (2020). Cyberstalking victimization: An empirical assessment of RAT among female Iranian college students. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(9-10), NP8088-NP8114.
48. Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Tandon, A., Alzeiby, E., and Abohassan, A. (2020). A systematic literature review on cyberstalking. An analysis of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120426
49. Keller, J., Mendes, K., and Ringrose, J. (2018). Speaking ‘unspeakable things’: documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 27, 22 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511
50. Kim, S., Choi, E., and Champion, J. D. (2024). Technology-facilitated sexual violence in South Korea: A content analysis of a website for victims. Violence Against Women, 30(11), 3077–3090.
51. Kim, S., Kim, Y., and Park, H. (2023). Digital sexual crime legislation and online harassment in South Korea: An evaluation of post-Nth Room measures. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09349-9
52. Korkman, Z. K. (2022). Transnational solidarity? Academia and the politics of knowledge, translation, and (im)mobility. Feminist Formations, 34(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2022.0007
53. Kumar, R. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis: Comprehensive Insights into Tools, Techniques, Applications, and Solutions for Research Excellence. Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences. https://doi.org/10.31181/sems31202535k
54. Kuo, S.-Y., Zhang, L., and Chang, K.-M. (2023). Technology-facilitated abuse in the context of intimate partner violence: A qualitative study of women survivors in Taiwan. Violence Against Women, 29(12–13), 2433–2454. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012231188093
55. Kurasawa, F., Rondinelli, E., and Kılıçaslan, G. (2021). Evidentiary activism in the digital age: on the rise of feminist struggles against gender-based online violence. Information, Communication and Society, 24, 2174 - 2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962945
56. Kuss, D. J., Kristensen, A. M., Williams, A. J., and Lopez-Fernandez, O. (2022). To be or not to be a female gamer: A qualitative exploration of female gamer identity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031169
57. Lazarides, M., Lazaridou, I., and Papanas, N. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis: Bridging Informatics With Science.. The international journal of lower extremity wounds, 15347346231153538. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231153538
58. Lu, S., and Luqiu, L. R. (2025). When will one help? Understanding audience intervention in online harassment of women journalists. Journalism Practice, 17(3), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2201582
59. Lunau, M., and Andreassen, R. (2022). Surveillance practices among migration officers: Online media and LGBTQ+ refugees. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26, 655 - 671. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221140129
60. Maggio, L. A., Larsen, K., Thomas, A., Costello, J., and Artino, A. R. Jr. (2020). Scoping reviews in medical education: A scoping review. Medical Education, 55(6), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14431
61. Mahlknecht, A., and Bork-Hüffer, T. (2023). Deepfake pornography and non-consensual image sharing: Emerging challenges for law and society. Computer Law and Security Review, 49, 105757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105757
62. Maisonobe, M., Grossetti, M., Milard, B., Jégou, L., and Eckert, D. (2017). The global geography of scientific visibility: a deconcentration process (1999–2011). Scientometrics, 113, 479-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2463-2
63. Marcum, C., and Higgins, G. (2021). A Systematic Review of Cyberstalking Victimization and Offending Behaviors. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 882 - 910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-021-09653-6
64. McLean, L., and Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Female gamers’ experience of online harassment and social support in online gaming: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 970–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9962-0
65. Mojahed, A., Alaidarous, N., Shabta, H., Hegewald, J., and Garthus-Niegel, S. (2020). Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in the Arab Countries: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 23, 390 - 407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020953099
66. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: The main steps. Encyclopedia, 4, Makale No: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
67. Paullet, K., and Chawdhry, A. (2020). Cyberstalking: An Analysis of Students' Online Activity. International Journal of Cyber Research and Education (IJCRE), 2(2), 1-8.
68. Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Colquhoun, H., Garritty, C., Hempel, S., Horsley, T., Langlois, E. V., Lillie, E., O’Brien, K. K.,
69. Tunçalp, Ö., Wilson, M. G., Zarin, W., and Tricco, A. C. (2021). Scoping reviews: Reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3
70. Pew Research Center. (2022). The state of online harassment. Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mayıs 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/06/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
71. Plan International. (2020). Free to be online? A report on girls’ and young women's experiences of online harassment. Erişim Tarihi: 12 Mayıs 2025, https://plan-international.org/publications/free-to-be-online/
72. Pokharel, B., Hegadoren, K., and Papathanassoglou, E. (2020). Factors influencing silencing of women who experience intimate partner violence: An integrative review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 52, 101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101422
73. Polyzoidou, V. (2024). Digital Violence Against Women: Is There a Real Need for Special Criminalization?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10179-3
74. Posetti, J., Aboulez, E., Bontcheva, K., Harrison, J., and Waisbord, S. (2021). The chilling: Global trends in online violence against women journalists. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377223
75. Powell, A., and Henry, N. (2019). Social media and justice for sexual violence: A critical and comparative analysis. Social Media + Society, 5(4).https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119861950
76. Rodríguez, D., Díaz-Ramírez, A., Miranda-Vega, J., Trujillo, L., and Mejía-Alvarez, P. (2021). A systematic review of computer science solutions for addressing violence against women and children. IEEE Access, 9, 114622–114639. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103459
77. Rungta, M., Singh, J., Mohammad, S., and Yang, D. (2022). Geographic citation gaps in NLP research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14424. Erişim Tarihi: 20 Mayıs 2025, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.14424
78. Sabiston, C. M., Vani, M. V., De Jonge, M., and Nesbitt, A. (2022). Scoping reviews and rapid reviews. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(1, Special Issue: Research Review Methodologies in Sport and Exercise Psychology, Editors: Pete Coffee and David Tod), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1964095
79. Salerno-Ferraro, A. C., Erentzen, C., and Schuller, R. A. (2022). Young women’s experiences with technology-facilitated sexual violence from male strangers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(19–20), NP18143–NP18167. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211030018
80. Samuel, A. (2023). Scoping reviews: Expanding methodological approaches to literature reviews in adult education. Adult Learning, 35(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231201346
81. Sarkar, S., and Rajan, B. (2021). Materiality and discursivity of cyber violence against women in India. Journal of Creative Communications, 18(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258621992273
82. Sharma, P., and Goyal, N. (2023). How to write a scoping review? International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research, 10(1), 53–56.
83. Sheikh, M., and Rogers, M. (2023). Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence and Abuse in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 25, 1614 - 1629. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231191189
84. Sobieraj, S. (2018). Bitch, slut, skank, cunt: Patterned resistance to women’s visibility in digital publics. Information, Communication and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348535
85. Soto, C., Sánchez, K., Monsalve, C., and Ortiz, B. (2023). Digital gender-based violence in Chile: A survey during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro). https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-6487.sess.2023.39.e22306.a.en
86. Tandoc, E. C., Sagun, K. K., and Alvarez, K. P. (2023). The digitization of harassment: Women journalists’ experiences with online harassment in the Philippines. Journalism Practice, 16(6), 1198–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1981774
87. Tarzia, L. (2020). Toward an ecological understanding of intimate partner sexual violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 11704–11727. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519900298
88. TBMM. (2022). 7418 sayılı Basın Kanunu ile Bazı Kanunlarda Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun (Resmî Gazete yayım tarihi: 18 Ekim 2022). Erişim Tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2025, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/10/20221018-1.htm
89. Thompson, D. F., and Walker, C. K. (2015). A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 35(6), 551–559.
90. Topidi, K. (2024). Attacking Muslim minority women online: An intersectional and multiactor framework on digital hate speech in the UK. Journal of Religion in Europe, 17(4), 434–472.
91. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... and Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
92. UN Women. (2021). Measuring the shadow pandemic: Violence against women during COVID-19. Erişim Tarihi: 28 Mayıs 2025, https://data.unwomen.org/publications/measuring-shadow-pandemic-violence-against-women-during-covid-19
93. Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., and Gosse, C. (2018). Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media and Society, 20(12), 4689–4708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818781324
94. Wang, J., and Zhang, L. (2018). Proximal advantage in knowledge diffusion: The time dimension. J. Informetrics, 12, 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.006
95. Watson, S. (2022). Investigating the role of social media abuse in gender-based violence: The experiences of women police officers. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 23(5), 829-844.
96. Whiley, L. A., Walasek, L., and Juanchich, M. (2023). Contributions to reducing online gender harassment: Social re-norming and appealing to empathy as tried-and-failed techniques. Sexualities, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535221104874
97. Zhang, W., Huang, S., Lam, L., Evans, R., and Zhu, C. (2022). Cyberbullying definitions and measurements in children and adolescents: Summarizing 20 years of global efforts. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1000504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1000504
98. Zhong, J. (2024). Remedies of online gendered violence against women in the digital context. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.61173/jjqm1j62
99. Zhou, Y., and Peterson, Z. D. (2024). Women’s experiences of sexual harassment in online gaming. Violence Against Women, 31(8), 1660–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241252021
100. Zviyita, I., and Mare, A. (2024). Same threats, different platforms? Female journalists’ experiences of online gender-based violence in selected newsrooms in Namibia. Journalism, 25(4), 779–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231183815