ANTRENÖRLERİN MESLEKİ ETİK İLKELERİ NELERDİR? NASIL ÖLÇÜLÜR? ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME: ÖLÇEĞİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİĞİ

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, antrenörlerin mesleki etik ilkelere uyma düzeylerini belirlemede kullanılacak geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı geliştirmek ve antrenörlerin mesleki etik ilkelere uyma düzeyleri arasında cinsiyet ve görev değişkenlerine göre anlamlı fark olup olmadığına da bakmaktır. Çalışma grubu, 44 antrenör ve 160 sporcudan oluşmuştur. Antrenörlerin % 18,2’si kadın, %81,8’i erkek, sporcuların %29,4 kadın, %70,6’sı erkektir. Grubun yaş ortalaması 23’dür. Gereksinim duyulan veriler “Antrenörlerin Mesleki Etik İlkeleri Ölçeği” (AMEİO) ile toplanmıştır. AMEİÖ’nün faktör yapısının belirlenmesi için, Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmış, ölçeğin güvenirliği için Cronbach Alfa katsayısı (.97) ve Spearman Brown korelasyonu (.84) hesaplanmıştır. Cinsiyet ve görev değişkenlerine göre etik ilkelere uyma düzeyleri arasındaki fark ise Mann Whitney U analizi kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Ölçekle ilgili sonuçlar AMEİO’nun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğunu göstermiştir. Erkek antrenörler, kadın antrenörlerle kıyasla etik ilkelere daha yüksek düzeyde uymaktadırlar. Görev değişkenleri incelendiğinde, antrenörler kendilerinin etik ilkelere uyma düzeylerinin sporcuların görüşlerine kıyasla daha yüksek olduğunu belirtmişlerdir

Keywords

• Antrenörlerin etik ilkeleri, ölçek geliştirme

WHAT ARE THE PROFESSIONAL CODES OF COACHES AND HOW ARE THEY MEASURED? DEVELOPMENT OF SCALE: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SCALE

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to develop a valid and reliable scale used to determine compliance levels to professional ethic codes of athletic coaches and examine the athletic coaches’ compliance levels to professional ethic codes in terms of gender and position variables. Participants were 44 coaches (18, 2 % female, 81, 8 % male) and 160 athletes (29, 4 % female, 70, 6 % male) (n=204, total) . To obtain related data, Coaches’ Professional Ethics Code Scale (CPECS) which was five degrees likert type was administered. To determine factor structure of scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were applied. For the reliability of the scale, Cronbach Alfa coefficient (.97) and Spearman Brown split-half correlation coefficient (.84) were calculated. Coaches’ compliance levels to professional ethic codes in terms of gender and position variables were analyzed by Mann Whitney U analysis. The results revealed that CPECS was a valid and reliable scale. Male coaches complied with ethical codes at a higher level in comparison to female. When the position variable was examined, coaches stated that their compliance level of ethical codes at higher than compared with athletes’ thought

Keywords

• Ethical codes of athletic coaches, the development of scale

References

1. William C.; Davis, K.; Post, E.J. Business and society, corporate strategy, publicly, ethics. USA: Mc. Graw Hill Publishing Company. 1988 p.52.
2. Fain, G. “Ethics in health, physical education, recreation and dance”. Eric clearinghouse on teacher education Washington DC.00- 04-1992,. Eric Identifier, ED342775; 1992:1-4.
3. Kretchman, R. T., Morgan, J.M., Meier, K.V. . Philosophic Injury in Sport. S.A. Human Kinetics; 1994. p. 22.
4. Haynes, Ethics in education. (Translation: Semra Kunt Akbaş). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Publishing; 2002. p. 29.
5. Lankard, B. A. “Resolving ethical dilemmas in the workplace a new focus for career development”. ERIC Clearinghouse No, CE 058749, 1991, P, 1-3. Eric Identifier, ED334468. Web,//askeric.org/plweb-cqi/fastweb. 6. Kuçuradi,
6. Pritchard, J. Codes of ethics. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 1: California Academic Pres. 1988; 528.
7. Penney, D.; Chandler, T. (). Physical education, what future(s)? Education and Society. 2000; 5- 1.
8. Grossing, S.. Physical movements and sports. (Translation: Adnan Orhun, Metin Sayın) I. Physical education and sport symposium in education Institutions.19-21 December. Meb Publishing. 1992. p:48.

9. Whithead, M “Sport ethics and education”. Sport Education and Society. .1998; 3, 2-:239-241.
10. Bucher, C. A.; Wuest, D. A. . Foundation of physical education and sport. Santa Clara: Times Mirrow Mosby College Publishing. 1987.p. 19.
11. Johnson, C. Assistant club coach. Coaching theory manuel. British amateur athletic board, London: BAAB Publishing; 1984. p. 3.
12. Bucher, A. C.; West A. D. Foundations of physical education exercise and sport. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.1999. p.22.
13. Robert, F. Priest, J.V. Krause, J. Besch ” Four year changes in college athletes ethical value choices in sports situations”. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1999; 70, 2.-170-178.
14. Carry, D. What moral educational significance has physical education? A question in need of disambiguation, In M.J.McName and S.J. Parry, eds. Ethics and Sport. London. E. And FNSPON. 1998 p.119-133.
15. Singleton, E.C. ” Rules? Relationships? a feminist analysis of competition and fair play in physical education”. Official Journal of the National Association for Kinesiology and Physical Education in Higher Education. QUEST 2003; 55. -495-209.
16. Spencer, F.A. . “Ethics in physical education and sport education”. Journal of Physical Education Recreation and Dance, 1996; 67- 37-39
17. Bergmann, D.S. “The logical connection between moral education and physical education”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2000; 32, 4, 561-573.
18. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct .December. 1992; 47 , 12.
19. Kline, P. An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge 2000.
20. Stevens, J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social science (3rd edition). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. .1996.
21. Tabachnick, B. G.; Fidell, L.S. Using multivariate statistics (Fourth edition). Boston: Ally and Bacon. 2001.
22. Sümer, N. Structural equality model: basic concept and application. Turkish Psychology Report, 2000; 3 ; 6: 49-74.
23. Cole, D. A. . Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1987; 55, 1019-1031.
24. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. . Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin,1998; 103, 391-410.
25. Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing D.W. The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1984; 49, 155-173.
26. Aydın, İ.P. Professional and organizational ethics. Pegem Publishing.p.28. Ankara,2002
27. Balcı, A. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Teknikleri. Pegem Yayınmcılık. Ankara. 2001.
28. Tezbaşaran, A. Liker Tipi Ölçek Geliştirme Klavuzu. Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.s.9 Ankara. 1997.
29. Çakır, R. İlköğretim okul müdürlerinin etik davranışlarının incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum. 1999.
30. Özbek, Ö. Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin mesleki etik ilkeleri ve bu ilkelere uyma düzeyleri. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.2003.
31. American National Youth Sports Coaches Association. (2003). Coaches’ Code of Ethics. Retrieved March, 22, 2004. web ,(http,//www.nays.org.)
32. British Institute of Sports Coaches (2001, September) Code of Ethics for Atletics and Conduct for Sport Coaches Retrieved April 26, 2002, web, (http,//www. Brainmac.demon.co.uk/ukethics.htm)
33. Canadian Professional Coaches Association (2003) Coaching Code of Ethics Principles and Ethical Standart Retrieved January 20, 2004.(http://www.coach.ca/member/ethicse.htm).
34. International Coaches Federation (May ,2003) ICF Standart of Ethical Conduct. Retrieved October 25 2003. Web, (http://www.ı[e-mail]).
35. United Kingdom Coaching Strategy Association (2002, April).Sport Coach, Coaching. Retrieved April 26, 2002, web,http,//www.brainmac.demon.co.uk/coaching.htm