BibTex RIS Cite

Beden eğitimi derslerinde motivasyon: tutum ve motivasyonel sratejilerin tahmin edici etkisi

Year 2014, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 139 - 146, 01.08.2014
https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000262

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı lise öğrencilerinde beden eğitimi dersine ilişkin motivasyonel düzenlemelerin, motivasyonel stratejiler ve tutum düzeyi üzerinde tahmin edici bir etkisi olup olmadığını incelemektir. Toplam 335 lise öğrencisi (179 kız, 156 erkek) çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Çalışmada, Öğrenmeye İlişkin Motivasyonel Stratejiler Ölçeği, Beden Eğitimi ve Spora İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği ve Beden Eğitiminde Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, beden eğitimi derslerinde öğrencilerin derse içsel motive olmalarının en büyük tahmin edicisinin özdüzenleme olduğunu; özdeşimle düzenlemenin, dışsal düzenlemenin ve motivasyonsuzluk durumunun en güçlü yordayıcısının derse ilişkin tutum olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte sonuçlar, bilişsel beceriler, beden eğitimi dersine ilişkin motivasyon tipi ve tutum arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymuştur

References

  • Stipek, D. Is child-centered early childhood education really better?,in: S. Reifel (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care: Perspectives practice, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 29– 52, 1993. appropriate
  • Rigby, C.S., Deci, E.L., Patrick, B.C., ve Ryan, R.M. “Beyond the intrinsic – extrinsic dichotomy, self – determination in motivation and learning”. Motivation and Emotion, 16 (3), pp. 165 – 185, 1992.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. 1985.
  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, Psychologist, 55, pp. 68-78, 2000.
  • Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., Leone, D.R. “Faculitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective.” Journal of Personality, 62(1), pp. 119–142, 1994.
  • Frederick, C., M., Ryan, R.M. “Self-determination in sport: A review using cognitive evaluation theory.” International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, pp. 5- 23, 1995.
  • Ingledew, D.K., Markland, D., Sheppard, K.E.. “Personality and self-determination of exercise behaviour.” Personality and Individual Differences, 36, pp. 1921–1932, 2004.
  • Boiché, J., Sarrazin, P. “Motivation autodéterminée, perceptions de conflit et d’instrumentalité et assiduité envers la pratique d’une activité physique: une étude prospective sur six mois.” Psychologie Française, 52, pp. 417- 430, 2007.
  • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Williams, G.C. “Need satisfaction and the self- regulation of learning.” Learning and Individual Differences, 8 (3), pp. 165- 183, 1996.
  • Pelletier, L.G, Fortier, M.S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, D.M., Briere, N.M., Blais, M.R. “Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, pp. 35-53, 1995.
  • Üredi, I., Üredi, L. “İlköğretim 8. Sınıf Öğrencileri- nin Öz-düzenleme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel İnançlarının Matematik Başarısını Yordama Gücü.” Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), pp. 250-260, 2005.
  • Pintrich, R. R. The role of goal orientation in self- regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., ve Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self- regulation, (pp. 451-501), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000.
  • Risemberg, R., Zimmerman, B. J. “Self-Regulated Learning In Gifted Students.” Roeper Review, 15(1), pp. 98-101, 1992.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., Zeidner, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Self- Regulation, s. 13-39. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. 15. Bandura, A. Self-Referent Development of Self Efficacy. In J. Flavell ve L.D. Ross (Eds.), Cognitive Social Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1980. The
  • Rozendaal, J.S., Minnaert, A., Boekaerts M. “Motivation and self-regulated learning in secondary processing type and gender differences.” Learning and Individual Differences, 13, pp. 273-289, 2003.
  • Lin, Y.G., McKeachie, W. J. College Student Intrinsic and/or Extrinsic Motivation and Learning. Annul Conference of the American Psychological Association, 1999.
  • Bergin, S., Reilly, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In P. Romero, J. Good, E. Acosta Chaparro & S. Bryant (Eds). Proc. 293 – 304, 2005.
  • Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • Geri, S. “Kırgızistan’daki üniversite öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi ve spor servis dersine tutumları ile akademik motivasyonlarının incelenmesi.” Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(8), pp. 32-35, 2013.
  • Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., Wild, T. C. “The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale.” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, pp. 231–251, 2006.
  • Pintrich, P. R., De Groot, E. “Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33-40, 1990.
  • Pintrich, P.R. Roeser, R., De Groot, E. “Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning.” Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161, 1994.
  • Chowdhury, M. S., Shahabuddin, A. M. “Self- efficacy, motivation and their relationship to academic performance of Bangladesh College Students.” College Quarterly, 10(1), pp. 1-9. 2007.
  • Shores, M. L., Shannon, D. M. “The Effects of Self- Regulation, Motivation, Anxiety, and Attributions on Mathematics Achievement for Fifth and Sixth Grade Students.” School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), pp. 225–236, 2007.
  • Cihangir Çankaya, Z. “Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz – belirleme kuramı.” Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4 (31), 55, pp. 23-31, 2009.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R.M. A motivational approach to self: symposium Motivation, edited by R. Dienstbier. (sf 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., 1991.
  • Demirhan, G., Altay, F. “Lise birinci sınıf öğrenci- lerinin beden eğitimi ve spor dersine ilişkin tutum- ları ölçeği II.” Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), pp. 9- 20, 2001.
  • Fairchild, A.J., Horst, S.J., Finney, S.J., Baron, K.E. “Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the academic motivation scale.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, pp. 331- 358, 2005.
  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C. M. “On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS).” Motivation and Emotion, 24, pp. 175-213, 2000.
  • İlhan, T. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Benlik Uyum Modeli: yaşam amaçları, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ve öznel iyi oluş. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2009
  • Kazak Çetinkalp, F. Z. “Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği (Situational Motivation Scale SIMS)’nin Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özellikleri (Psy- chometric properties of the Turkish version of The Situational Motivation Scale – SIMS)”. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), pp. 86-94, 2010.
  • Üredi, I. Algılanan anne baba tutumlarının ilköğre- tim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayın- lanmamış Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2005.

MOTIVATION IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION: THE PREDICTIVE EFFECT OF ATTITUDE AND MOTIVATIONAL STRATEGIES

Year 2014, Volume: 12 Issue: 2, 139 - 146, 01.08.2014
https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000262

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the predictive effect of motivational regulations in physical education on motivational strategies and attitude level. Totally 335 high school students (179 girls, 156 boys) attended voluntarily to the study. Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire, Attitudes toward Physical Education and Sport, and Situational Motivation Scale were used. The results showed that self-regulation was the strongest predictor of intrinsic motivation for physical education and attitudes toward physical education was the strongest predictor for identified regulation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Besides, results confirmed the relationship between cognitive strategies, motivational regulation for physical education, and attitudes

References

  • Stipek, D. Is child-centered early childhood education really better?,in: S. Reifel (Ed.), Advances in early education and day care: Perspectives practice, Vol. 5, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 29– 52, 1993. appropriate
  • Rigby, C.S., Deci, E.L., Patrick, B.C., ve Ryan, R.M. “Beyond the intrinsic – extrinsic dichotomy, self – determination in motivation and learning”. Motivation and Emotion, 16 (3), pp. 165 – 185, 1992.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. 1985.
  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, Psychologist, 55, pp. 68-78, 2000.
  • Deci, E.L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B.C., Leone, D.R. “Faculitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective.” Journal of Personality, 62(1), pp. 119–142, 1994.
  • Frederick, C., M., Ryan, R.M. “Self-determination in sport: A review using cognitive evaluation theory.” International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, pp. 5- 23, 1995.
  • Ingledew, D.K., Markland, D., Sheppard, K.E.. “Personality and self-determination of exercise behaviour.” Personality and Individual Differences, 36, pp. 1921–1932, 2004.
  • Boiché, J., Sarrazin, P. “Motivation autodéterminée, perceptions de conflit et d’instrumentalité et assiduité envers la pratique d’une activité physique: une étude prospective sur six mois.” Psychologie Française, 52, pp. 417- 430, 2007.
  • Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M., Williams, G.C. “Need satisfaction and the self- regulation of learning.” Learning and Individual Differences, 8 (3), pp. 165- 183, 1996.
  • Pelletier, L.G, Fortier, M.S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, D.M., Briere, N.M., Blais, M.R. “Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, pp. 35-53, 1995.
  • Üredi, I., Üredi, L. “İlköğretim 8. Sınıf Öğrencileri- nin Öz-düzenleme Stratejileri ve Motivasyonel İnançlarının Matematik Başarısını Yordama Gücü.” Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), pp. 250-260, 2005.
  • Pintrich, R. R. The role of goal orientation in self- regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., ve Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self- regulation, (pp. 451-501), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2000.
  • Risemberg, R., Zimmerman, B. J. “Self-Regulated Learning In Gifted Students.” Roeper Review, 15(1), pp. 98-101, 1992.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., Zeidner, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Self- Regulation, s. 13-39. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000. 15. Bandura, A. Self-Referent Development of Self Efficacy. In J. Flavell ve L.D. Ross (Eds.), Cognitive Social Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1980. The
  • Rozendaal, J.S., Minnaert, A., Boekaerts M. “Motivation and self-regulated learning in secondary processing type and gender differences.” Learning and Individual Differences, 13, pp. 273-289, 2003.
  • Lin, Y.G., McKeachie, W. J. College Student Intrinsic and/or Extrinsic Motivation and Learning. Annul Conference of the American Psychological Association, 1999.
  • Bergin, S., Reilly, R. The influence of motivation and comfort-level on learning to program. In P. Romero, J. Good, E. Acosta Chaparro & S. Bryant (Eds). Proc. 293 – 304, 2005.
  • Nunnally, J.C., Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • Geri, S. “Kırgızistan’daki üniversite öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi ve spor servis dersine tutumları ile akademik motivasyonlarının incelenmesi.” Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(8), pp. 32-35, 2013.
  • Wilson, P. M., Rogers, W. T., Rodgers, W. M., Wild, T. C. “The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale.” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, pp. 231–251, 2006.
  • Pintrich, P. R., De Groot, E. “Motivational and self regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), pp. 33-40, 1990.
  • Pintrich, P.R. Roeser, R., De Groot, E. “Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning.” Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161, 1994.
  • Chowdhury, M. S., Shahabuddin, A. M. “Self- efficacy, motivation and their relationship to academic performance of Bangladesh College Students.” College Quarterly, 10(1), pp. 1-9. 2007.
  • Shores, M. L., Shannon, D. M. “The Effects of Self- Regulation, Motivation, Anxiety, and Attributions on Mathematics Achievement for Fifth and Sixth Grade Students.” School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), pp. 225–236, 2007.
  • Cihangir Çankaya, Z. “Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz – belirleme kuramı.” Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4 (31), 55, pp. 23-31, 2009.
  • Deci, E. L., Ryan, R.M. A motivational approach to self: symposium Motivation, edited by R. Dienstbier. (sf 237-288). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press., 1991.
  • Demirhan, G., Altay, F. “Lise birinci sınıf öğrenci- lerinin beden eğitimi ve spor dersine ilişkin tutum- ları ölçeği II.” Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), pp. 9- 20, 2001.
  • Fairchild, A.J., Horst, S.J., Finney, S.J., Baron, K.E. “Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the academic motivation scale.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, pp. 331- 358, 2005.
  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C. M. “On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS).” Motivation and Emotion, 24, pp. 175-213, 2000.
  • İlhan, T. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Benlik Uyum Modeli: yaşam amaçları, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar ve öznel iyi oluş. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2009
  • Kazak Çetinkalp, F. Z. “Durumsal Güdülenme Ölçeği (Situational Motivation Scale SIMS)’nin Türkçe versiyonunun psikometrik özellikleri (Psy- chometric properties of the Turkish version of The Situational Motivation Scale – SIMS)”. Türkiye Klinikleri Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (2), pp. 86-94, 2010.
  • Üredi, I. Algılanan anne baba tutumlarının ilköğre- tim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançları üzerindeki etkisi. Yayın- lanmamış Doktora Tezi. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2005.
There are 32 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA34PP86MF
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Eren Yetim This is me

Yusuf Demir This is me

İlker Gökçe Erturan This is me

Publication Date August 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 12 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Yetim, E., Demir, Y., & Erturan, İ. G. (2014). Beden eğitimi derslerinde motivasyon: tutum ve motivasyonel sratejilerin tahmin edici etkisi. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000262

Flag Counter