15-16. Yüzyıl Kantaşı ve Kabuk Kameolarda Dini Tasvirlerden Örnekler

Abstract

Bu çalışmamız kapsamında taş oyma eserlerin önemli bir kısmını oluşturan kameolar ve onların üzerinde işlenmiş olan dini tasvirlerden örnekler incelenmiştir. Kameo kelimesinin kökeni net olarak bilinmemekle birlikte, tılsım, muska anlamlarına gelen Arapça khamea kelimesinden türediği düşünülmektedir. Bir diğer görüş ise, mücevherler için kullanılan Yunanca, camabeu ya da camaieul kelimeleri ile ilişkili olduğudur. Ayrıca Süryanice tılsım anlamına gelen chemeia ya da deve hörgücü anlamına gelen camaut kelimesinden türediği de düşünülmektedir. Kameolar farklı çeşitlerde üretilmektedir. Bunlar değerli ve yarı değerli taşlar ile üretilen kameolar ve ayrıca kabuklu deniz hayvanlarının kabukları ile üretilen kabuk kameolardır. Kabuk kameolar, sert materyaller ile yapılan kameolara göre daha dayanıksız olduklarından ve deniz kabuklarından üretildiklerinden günümüze ulaşabilen kabuk kameo sayısı, dayanıklı taşlarla yapılanlara göre daha azdır. Ayrıca pek çok farklı yumuşakçanın kabuğundan üretilen bu kameolar, canlı türüne bağlı olarak farklı renk seçeneklerinin oluşmasına da imkan vermişlerdir. Çalışmamız kapsamında ele aldığımız bir diğer grup kameo, kantaşı ile yapılan kameolardır. Bu taş, özellikle üzerinde doğal olarak barındırdığı kırmızı damlalardan dolayı dini tasvirlerde çoğunlukla tercih edilmiş ve İsa’nın yaralarından akan kanları tasvir etmek için sanatçılara çok elverişli bir zemin hazırlamıştır. Özellikle 16.yy’da İtalya ve Almanya’da çok tercih edilen bir taş haline gelmiştir. Aynı şekilde kabuk kameolar da 16.yy’da son derece popüler bir hale gelmiş, daha sonraki dönemlerde daha az tercih edilir olsa bile özellikle 20.yy’da İtalya’da yeniden yaygın bir kullanıma kavuşmuştur. Çalışmamız dahilinde hem kabuk kameolar hem de kantaşı kameolardan farklı örnekler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

• Kameo
• kabuk kameo
• kantaşı
• Rönesans
• Precious stone
• cameo
• shell cameo
• heliotrope
• Renaissance period

Examples of Religious Descriptions in 15th and 16th Centuries Heliotrope and Shell Cameos

Abstract

Stones shaped with glyptography are the pieces of art that have reached today from the Middle Age and Renaissance periods with minimum change in time. They have been used in the post-classical period by collectors as they are valuable materials they are durable, economic, and have an aesthetic quality. Examples of shell cameos and religious depictions carved on them are analyzed in the scope of this study. Cameos are originally based on the use of hard stones; however, artists have started to use shells, lava, and other materials in time. Cameos have been produced in different ways. These are cameos that are produced from valuable and semi-valuable stones and shell cameos that are produced from shellfish. Seashells and pearl cameos were used during the 15th and 16th century Renaissance. Stonemasons especially in Florence and Torre del Greco were very successful in seashell cameo embroidery. As shell cameos are less durable than cameos produced from hard materials, the number of shell cameos that could reach today is fewer compared to the other types of cameos. Shell cameos weren’t directly carved like hard stones; they were rather shaped with hand tools. Artists usually preferred burin, knife, or needles when necessary. Shells are separated into pieces with a soft hacksaw, the target shape is achieved, edges are gently thinned and the middle part is left thick. These cameos which had been produced in the 1500s in France and Italy became popular at the beginning of the 19th century in England and in its neighbourhood in the art of jewelry-making. Besides shell cameos, one of the materials on which religious depictions are made is a special stone called heliotrope. This stone, used as a stamp, was used as a talisman as it was believed that it stopped bleeding. As there are red drops on some of these stones, they were used in most Jesus depictions created in 16th century Italy. The belief that stones like carnelian and bloodstone stopped bleeding wasn’t merely common in ancient history; people in the 16th century also believed in this idea. Shell cameos, whose production period is easier than hard cameos, used to be very popular and commonly preferred during the Renaissance period. Bloodstone, which was easy to work on, was one of the indispensable materials as they also had red veins on them. However, as they are less durable, the pieces that could survive are limited. Cameo craftsmanship which had been especially popular in Italy and Germany during the Renaissance period started to decrease at the end of the 17th century and was replaced by other ornament techniques; this period had continued until the 19th century when it started to be regarded as a branch of art in Italy. At the end of this century, Rome and Genova were the most successful regions in terms of cameo craftsmanship. During this period, there were 80 shell cameo artists in Rome while there were 30 shell cameo artists in Genova. Different examples of shell cameos and heliotrope cameos are presented in our study.

Keywords

• Precious stone
• cameo
• shell cameo
• heliotrope
• Renaissance period

References

1. Anonim, (1875), Cameos, The Art Journal, C.1, 343-345.
2. Anonim, (1880), Cameo Shells and Cameo Cutting, Scientific American, 42 (5), 69.
3. Anonim, (1904), Cameos and Their History, Scientific American, 90 (26), 491.
4. Cömert, B, (1999), Mitoloji ve İkonografi, Ayraç Yayınevi: Ankara.
5. Dalton, O.M. (1913), Medieval and Later Engraved Gems in the British Museum-I, The Burlington Magazine, 23(123), 128-136.
6. Davenport, C ve Gill F. (1901), Cameos, The Journal of The Society of Arts, 49 (2514), 141-252.
7. Draper, J. D. (2008), Cameo Appearances, The Metropolitan Museum of Art: New York.
8. Gray, Fred L. (1983), Engraved Gems: A Historical Perspective, Gems and Gemology, Winter, 191-201.

9. Hackenbroch, Y. (1989), A Paternoster Pendant in the Robert Lehman Collection, Metropolitan Museum Journal, 24, s. 127-133.
10. Kabaağaç S ve Akova E. (1995) Latince Türkçe Sözlük, Sosyal Yayınlar:İstanbul.
11. McCrory, M. (1988), Renaissance Shell Cameos from the Carrand Collection of the Muzeo Nazionale del Bargello, The Burlington Magazine, 130 (1023), 412-426.
12. McCrory, M. (1997), The Symbolism of Stones: Engraved Gems at the Medici Grand-Ducal Court (1537-1609), Studies in the History of Art, 54, Symposium Paper: XXXII: Engraved Gems: Survivals and Revivals, s. 160.
13. Miller, Anna ve Jarret D. (2009), Cameos Old&New, GemStone Press: Canada.
14. Newman, H. 2000, An Illustrated Dictionary of Jewelry, Thames and Hudson: London.
15. Remington, P. (1940), The Milton Weil Collection of Cameos and Intaglios, The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, 35 (4), April, s.76-80.
16. S.C., (1847), The Art of Cameo Engraving, Scientific American, 3 (7), 56.
17. Tait, H. (Ed). (1986), Seven Thousand Years of Jewely, British Museum Publications:London.
18. Thomas, C. (1912), Gem Engraving, Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 60(3091), s.359-371.
19. Weber, Ingrid, (1997), Giant Cameos of the Late Eighteenth Century in Precious Tablets with Cameos and Jewelry, Studies in the History of Art, Vol:54, Symposium Paper: XXXII: Engraved Gems: Survivals and Revivals, 248-261.
20. Yalçınkaya, M, (2013), Kameo Örneğinde Süstaşı İşlemeciliği, (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü, İzmir.
21. Yuen T., (1997), Glyptic Sources of Renaissance Art, Studies in the History of Art, Vol:54, Symposium Paper: XXXII: Engraved Gems: Survivals and Revivals, 136-157.