Batı Karadeniz’de Tarihi Bir Yerleşimin Mekânsal Dönüşüm Süreci: Çatalzeytin, Kastamonu

Year 2025, Volume: 34 Issue: 2, 509 - 537, 30.12.2025

Burcu Taşcı

https://doi.org/10.29135/std.1716084

Abstract

Çatalzeytin is a sparsely populated coastal settlement in the province of Kastamonu in the Western Black Sea Region of Türkiye. Today, it is a small-scale settlement that contains more than forty villages and has not developed due to geographical conditions. However, during the Ottoman period, it was an important settlement that stood out economically with its forestry and maritime activities. Its built environment once comprised traditional wooden houses, educational buildings, religious structures, and public institutions characteristic of the region. Today, the settlement has largely lost the tangible cultural heritage elements that make up its historical fabric due to a variety of factors. The aim of this study is to examine the historical development of Çatalzeytin by dividing it into periods after its establishment at the beginning of the 18th century, to determine the tangible cultural heritage elements that have survived/not survived to the present day and to make a conservation-oriented assessment based on the spatial transformation process of the settlement. The settlement was examined in four periods based on administrative structure: the period before the establishment, the period with village status from the beginning of the 18th century to 1911, the sub-district (nahiyelik) period from 1911 to 1954, and the district period from 1954 to 2000. A review of the existing literature reveals a lack of comprehensive research regarding both the identification of Çatalzeytin’s tangible cultural heritage and its spatial transformation. The scope of this study is limited to the settlement center of Çatalzeytin district, and rural areas are excluded from the evaluation. The method of the study includes field work, archival research, literature review, and mapping. During this process, historical maps, aerial photographs, official documents, newspaper reports, and photographic archives were examined. Historical photographs of the settlement were obtained from the archives of the local Çatalzeytin Mektubu Newspaper published since 1982 and the Ciye Çatalzeytin Documentary published as a special supplement of the same newspaper. The physical development of Çatalzeytin has been shaped by spatial organizations that have changed in parallel with administrative status changes throughout history. In the pre-establishment period, it is assumed that the settlement exhibited a very small-scale character closely related to the coastline. Upon attaining village status in the early 18th century, a settlement pattern based on rural life and maritime/forestry activities emerged. A sloped coastal settlement developed, with traditional wooden houses and a marketplace centered around a religious building. During the sub-district period (1911–1954), as administrative functions expanded, public structures such as squares, mosques, government offices, and schools were constructed, giving rise to a centralized civic core. Following its designation as a district in 1954, modern public buildings, social facilities, health and education structures, and land reclamation projects along the shoreline appeared. During this period, physical growth accelerated, and parts of the traditional urban fabric were replaced by unqualified constructions. Unregulated construction activity, especially after 1980, weakened Çatalzeytin’s unique historical and environmental identity, particularly its relationship with the coast. Since the 2000s, it has been observed that it has largely lost its unique identity and silhouette with the unqualified multi-storey buildings parallel to the coastline. As a result, it has been observed that the original historical fabric has largely disappeared, except for a small number of wooden houses; these wooden houses have been destroyed since they were not officially registered as cultural assets, and in return, the construction activities of unqualified multi-storey reinforced concrete structures have rapidly increased. The main reasons for this negative process are the absence of conservation regulations, population decline due to outward migration, property ownership disputes, and the inability of historic structures to meet contemporary living standards. All these factors have contributed to the erasure of physical traces that reflect the settlement’s historical continuity, which in turn has negatively impacted the preservation of social memory. Therefore, a comprehensive and holistic conservation approach must be adopted to ensure the sustainability of the settlement’s existing historical fabric. In addition to registration and documentation efforts, initiatives must be developed to engage and raise awareness among the local population. Otherwise, Çatalzeytin’s architectural and cultural memory is at serious risk of irreversible loss.

Keywords

Kültürel miras , yerleşim tarihi , mekânsal dönüşüm , Kastamonu , Çatalzeytin

Spatial Transformation Process of a Historical Settlement in the Western Black Sea Region: Çatalzeytin, Kastamonu

Abstract

Çatalzeytin is a sparsely populated coastal settlement in the province of Kastamonu in the Western Black Sea Region of Türkiye. Today, it is a small-scale settlement that contains more than forty villages and has not developed due to geographical conditions. However, during the Ottoman period, it was an important settlement that stood out economically with its forestry and maritime activities. Its built environment once comprised traditional wooden houses, educational buildings, religious structures, and public institutions characteristic of the region. Today, the settlement has largely lost the tangible cultural heritage elements that make up its historical fabric due to a variety of factors. The aim of this study is to examine the historical development of Çatalzeytin by dividing it into periods after its establishment at the beginning of the 18th century, to determine the tangible cultural heritage elements that have survived/not survived to the present day and to make a conservation-oriented assessment based on the spatial transformation process of the settlement. The settlement was examined in four periods based on administrative structure: the period before the establishment, the period with village status from the beginning of the 18th century to 1911, the sub-district (nahiyelik) period from 1911 to 1954, and the district period from 1954 to 2000. A review of the existing literature reveals a lack of comprehensive research regarding both the identification of Çatalzeytin’s tangible cultural heritage and its spatial transformation. The scope of this study is limited to the settlement center of Çatalzeytin district, and rural areas are excluded from the evaluation. The method of the study includes field work, archival research, literature review, and mapping. During this process, historical maps, aerial photographs, official documents, newspaper reports, and photographic archives were examined. Historical photographs of the settlement were obtained from the archives of the local Çatalzeytin Mektubu Newspaper published since 1982 and the Ciye Çatalzeytin Documentary published as a special supplement of the same newspaper. The physical development of Çatalzeytin has been shaped by spatial organizations that have changed in parallel with administrative status changes throughout history. In the pre-establishment period, it is assumed that the settlement exhibited a very small-scale character closely related to the coastline. Upon attaining village status in the early 18th century, a settlement pattern based on rural life and maritime/forestry activities emerged. A sloped coastal settlement developed, with traditional wooden houses and a marketplace centered around a religious building. During the sub-district period (1911–1954), as administrative functions expanded, public structures such as squares, mosques, government offices, and schools were constructed, giving rise to a centralized civic core. Following its designation as a district in 1954, modern public buildings, social facilities, health and education structures, and land reclamation projects along the shoreline appeared. During this period, physical growth accelerated, and parts of the traditional urban fabric were replaced by unqualified constructions. Unregulated construction activity, especially after 1980, weakened Çatalzeytin’s unique historical and environmental identity, particularly its relationship with the coast. Since the 2000s, it has been observed that it has largely lost its unique identity and silhouette with the unqualified multi-storey buildings parallel to the coastline. As a result, it has been observed that the original historical fabric has largely disappeared, except for a small number of wooden houses; these wooden houses have been destroyed since they were not officially registered as cultural assets, and in return, the construction activities of unqualified multi-storey reinforced concrete structures have rapidly increased. The main reasons for this negative process are the absence of conservation regulations, population decline due to outward migration, property ownership disputes, and the inability of historic structures to meet contemporary living standards. All these factors have contributed to the erasure of physical traces that reflect the settlement’s historical continuity, which in turn has negatively impacted the preservation of social memory. Therefore, a comprehensive and holistic conservation approach must be adopted to ensure the sustainability of the settlement's existing historical fabric. In addition to registration and documentation efforts, initiatives must be developed to engage and raise awareness among the local population. Otherwise, Çatalzeytin's architectural and cultural memory is at serious risk of irreversible loss.

Keywords

Cultural heritage , settlement history , spatial transformation , Kastamonu , Çatalzeytin

References

• Abdurrezzak, A. O. (2015). Yaygın Eğitim Bağlamında Sosyo-Kültürel İşlevleri Açısından Köy Odaları: Kastamonu Örneği. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(7), 33-47.
• Ablak, M. T. (2018). Edebiyat, Sanat ve Sosyo-Kültürel Tarih Açısından Kastamonu- Çatalzeytin İlçesi Tarihî Mezar Taşları. Metafor, 1(4).
• Aikaterini Laskaridis Foundation. (2023). Marcianus, Epitome Of Menippus’ Periplus. URL: https://www.laskaridisfoundation.org (Erişim Tarihi: 09.01.2023)
• Aksulu, B. I., & Esen, S. Ö. (2015). Bolu, Seben District, Dedeler Village Cuma Mosque Conservation Problems As a Case of Rural Architecture. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art, Humanities, Design and Planning, 3(4), 69-78.
• Arrianus, L. F. (2005). Arrianus’un Karadeniz Seyahati: Periplus Ponti Euxini (M. Aslan, Çev.). İstanbul: Odin Yayıncılık.
• Arslan Gül, E., & Gül, İ. E. (2020). Kastamonu Vilayet Salnamelerinde İnebolu Kazası (Küre ve Abana Nâhiyeleri) 1869-1903. İstanbul.
• Ballard, R. D., Hiebert, F. T., Coleman, D. F., Ward, C., Smith, J. S., Willis, K., Foley, B., Croff, K., Major, C., & Torre, F. (2001). Deepwater Archaeology of the Black Sea: The 2000 Season At Sinop, Turkey. American Journal of Archaeology, 105(4), 607-623.
• Barkan, Ö. L. (1942). İstila Devirlerinin Kolonizatör Türk Dervişleri ve Zaviyeler. Vakıflar Dergisi, 2. Ankara.
• Bijişkyan, P. M. (1969). Karadeniz Kıyıları Tarih ve Coğrafyası (H. D. Andreasyan, Çev.). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi.
• BOA, C. EV. 99/4934, H-29-12-1141 (M-26-07-1729).
• BOA, DH. İD. 92/1, d 19, H-07-12-1328 (M-10-12-1910).
• BOA, DH. MB. HPS. 31/20, H-30-05-1336 (M-13-03-1918).
• BOA, DH. MB. HPS. M. 33/38, H-07-07-1336 (M-18-04-1918).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 1301/9, H-22-11-1326 (M-16-12-1908).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 1496/44, H-16-03-1305 (M-02-12-1887).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 160/25, H-20-04-1311 (M-31-10-1893).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 1829/19, H-09-09-1308 (M-18-04-1891).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 2026/80, H-11-05-1310 (M-01-12-1892).
• BOA, DH. MKT. 89/36, H-04-01-1311 (M-18-07-1893).
• BOA, FK. DH. İD. 87/2, H-18-12-1332 (M-07-11-1914).
• BOA, İ. RSM. 13/6, H-21-10-1318 (M-11-02-1901).
• BOA, MF. MKT. 233/14, H-15-04-1312 (M-16-10-1894).
• BOA, MKT. MHM. 445/68, H-16-11-1289 (M-15-01-1873).
• BOA, ML. VRD. TMT. d 3738.
• BOA, NFS. d 824, H-29-12-1246 (M-10-06-1831).
• BOA, NFS. d 888.
• Can, Y. (2003). Kastamonu ve Sinop Yöresinde Bulunan Ahşap Camiler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(14–15), 117–134.
• Çay, K. (2023). Temettuat Defterlerine Göre Ginolu Kazasında İktisadi Faaliyetler. Hazine-i Evrak Arşiv ve Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(5), 85-109.
• Çay, K. (2024). Temettuat Defterlerine Göre Ginolu Kazası’nın (Abana, Bozkurt, Çatalzeytin) Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapısı. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Çetinkaya, Ş. (2019). Kastamonu’nun Tarihi İki Kazası: Devrekani ve Ginolu Sahili (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kastamonu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kastamonu.
• De Saint-Martin, M. V. (1852). Description Historique Et Géographique De L’Asie Mineure: Comprenant Les Temps Anciens, Le Moyen Âge Et Les Temps Modernes. Paris.
• Doğan, H. (2023). 1800’lerde Kırım, Ginolu ve Çatalzeytin. Ankara: Favori Yayınları.
• Eğilmez, M., & Oğur, Ö. (2020). Kastamonu Hurufat Defterleri (1690–1840). İstanbul: Hiperlink Yayınları.
• Eser, E. (2004). Kinolis (Ginolu) Kalesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2).
• Gökaşan, E., Tur, H., Ecevitoğlu, B., Görüm, T., Türker, A., Tok, B., & Birkan, H. (2006). İstanbul Boğazı Deniz Tabanı Morfolojisini Denetleyen Etkenler: Son Buzul Dönemi Sonrası Aşınma İzlerinin Kanıtları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yerbilimleri Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, 27(3), 157-158.
• Gökoğlu, A. (1952). Paphlagonia-Paflagonya: Gayrimenkul Eski Eserleri ve Arkeolojisi (Cilt I). Kastamonu.
• Gül, E. A., & Gül, İ. E. (2020). Kastamonu Vilayet Salnamelerinde İnebolu Kazası (Küre ve Abana Nâhiyeleri) 1869-1903. İstanbul.
• Halaç, H. H. & Dağlı, H. (2022). Marla Taşının Yapı Malzemesi Olarak Kullanımı; İnebolu’da Çatı Malzemesi Olarak Kullanım Örneği. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24 (1), 147-166.
• Harita Genel Müdürlüğü (HGM), 1950, 1990 ve 2003 yılı hava fotoğrafları, Ankara.
• Harp Tarihi Vesikaları Dergisi, Haziran 1963, 12, sayı 44.
• İbn Bîbî. (2010). Selçuknâme (M. H. Yinanç, Çev.). İstanbul: Kitabevi.
• Kaplan, E. (1994). Çatalzeytin Göç ve Çatalzeytinli. İstanbul: Gür-Ay Matbaası.
• Karagöz, R. (2003). Canikli Ali Paşa. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları.
• Kırımlı, H. (2008). Emigrations from the Crimea to the Ottoman Empire during the Crimean War. Middle Eastern Studies, 44(5), 751-773.
• Kocabaş, A., & Altıner, D. (2015). Çatalzeytin Stratejik Gelişme Çerçevesi Önerisi (PLK 503 Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileme Yüksek Lisans Atölye Dersi Raporu). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü.
• Kocabaş, A., & Altıner, D. (2016). Çatalzeytin Bireysel Eylem Planı Önerileri (PLK 502 Kentsel Koruma ve Yenileme Yüksek Lisans Atölye Dersi Raporu). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü.
• Lucius Flavius Arrianus. (2005). Arrianus’un Karadeniz Seyahati, Periplus Ponti Euxini (M. Aslan, Çev.). Murat Aslan, İstanbul: Odin Yayıncılık.
• Mayo, R. (1813). A View of Ancient Geography and Ancient History. Philadelphia: John F. Watson.
• Nefes, E. (2004). Kastamonu-Çatalzeytin İlçesi Çağlar Köyü Merkez Camii Haziresi’nde Bulunan Balık Figürlü Bir Mezar Taşı. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(16), 205-213.
• Öztürk, E. T., & Ünlü, H. (Ed.). (2008). CİYE Çatalzeytin Belgeseli. Ankara: Ankamat Matbaacılık.
• Öztürk, S., & Kalaycı Kadak, M. (2018). Kastamonu-Çatalzeytin ve Çevresinin İklim Konforu Şartlarının Ekoturizm Aktiviteleri Yönünden İncelenmesi. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 12-21.
• Pascal, F. (1806). Carte D’Une Partie Du Pont Galatique De La Paphlagonie Par M. Fourcade Aîné, Commissaire Général Des Relations Commerciales De France Et Consul Général De S. M. Impériale Napoléon À Sinope. National Library of France. URL: https://www.europeana.eu/item/9200517/ark12148_btv1b8494359f (Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2023)
• Pliny. (1942). Natural History (Vol. II–VI/5–6) (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Ramsay, W. M. (1962). The Historical Geography of Asia Minor. Amsterdam: A. M. Hakkert.
• Romer, F. E. (1998). Pomponius Mela’s Description of the World. Michigan, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
• Skylax. (tarihsiz). The Periplous of Pseudo-Skylax (G. Shipley, Çev.). http://www.le.ac.uk/ar/gjs/skylax_for_www_02214.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ağustos 2002)
• Strabon. (1991). Coğrafya: Anadolu (Kitap XII, XIII, XIV) (A. Pekman, Çev.). İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
• Sümer, F. (1972). Oğuzlar (Türkmenler) Tarihleri, Boy Teşkilatları, Destanları (2. Baskı, No. 170). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları.
• Tosun, H. E. (2019). Eko Restorasyon Yaklaşımı: Kastamonu Çatalzeytin Örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Türk Patent ve Marka Kurumu. (2021). Çatalzeytin Fındık Şekeri Coğrafi İşaret Sicil Belgesi (Tescil No. 734, 24.04.2021). Ankara: Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı.
• Türkan, O., & Tepealtı, F. (2024). Kent Nüfusu Tespitinde Belediye Kanunu Sorunu: Kastamonu İli Örneği. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 17(6), 2115–2141.
• Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) (2024). Çatalzeytin 2023 yılı nüfus verileri.
• Umar, B. (1993). Türkiye’deki Tarihsel Adlar. İstanbul: İnkılap Kitabevi.
• Yağcılar, A. (2019). Yaşam Kalitesi Değerlendirmesi: Kastamonu Çatalzeytin Örneği (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Yakupoğlu, C. (2014). Kastamonu Adının Ortaya Çıkışını Anlatan En Eski Kaynak: Saltuknâme. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(16), 200-220.
• Yakupoğlu, C. ve Musalı, N. (2018). Çobanoğulları Uc Beyliği dönemine ait Gideros Fetihnâmesi (683 / 1284): çeviri ve değerlendirme. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37(63), 77-134. 
• Yanıkkaya, M. (1985). Çatalzeytin İlçesinin İlk Yılı. Çatalzeytin Dergisi, 1, 4.
• Yeni, Ö. (2017). Kastamonu-Çatalzeytin İlçesi Çağlar Köyü Merkez Camii Haziresi’nde Bulunan Balık Remizli Yeniçeri Mezar Taşı. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 60.
• Yılmaz, C. (2014). Sinop-Kastamonu Yöresinde Geçici Bir Mesken Tipi: “Gelik”. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 11 (1), 92-102.
• Yılmaz, M. E. (2023). Kastamonu Çatalzeytin’de Türbe Camii Haziresindeki Mezar Taşları (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Samsun.
• Yiğit, İ. (1994). Divan. Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslam Ansiklopedisi (DİA), 9, 333.
• Abana Gazetesi, 15 Nisan 1978.
• Resmî Gazete, 10 Mart 1954, karar no: 8654.
• Cumhuriyet Gazetesi, 20 Ocak 1944, sayı 4.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 1987, sayı 60.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 1999, sayı 201
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 2011, sayı 324.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 2013, sayı 350.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 2014, sayı 358.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 2018, sayı 404.
• Çatalzeytin Mektubu Gazetesi, 2025, sayı 484.