Research Article

COLOURED STONE DECORATIONS IN ANITKABİR -An Iconographic Approach-

Volume: 26 Number: 1 April 28, 2017
EN TR

COLOURED STONE DECORATIONS IN ANITKABİR -An Iconographic Approach-

Abstract

It is certain that Anıtkabir has a very important place among the works of the Turkish Architecture in the Republican Era. This structure, which carries the characteristics of the Second National Architecture trend, has been defined more often with the information in the articles and books of the architecture originated researchers, while it has not been dealt with by the art historians who are more interested in the Turkish works of the Seljuki and Ottoman periods based on the worry that the assessment value might be early. In this paper, an attempt has been made to summarize what is already known about the structure and focus has been given on the coloured stone decorations used in Anıtkabir and on their meanings.

The colored stone decorations took place in various buildings of Seljuks, Beyliks and Ottoman Periods in Anatolian Turkish Architecture and continued to exist in buildings belonging to the Second National Architecture Movement during the Republican Period. The colored stone decorations of Anıtkabir, especially the Hall of Honor, the Ceremony Hall and Atatürk’s Grave Room, which are the most important works of this movement, are the motifs of Turkish Art originating from Central Asia. These motifs have traces of Turkish Mythology as well as their decoration and meaning.

Keywords

References

  1. Alpagut Karslı, Leyla (1999), Mimar Clemens Holzmeister ve III. T.B.M.M. Binası, Hacettepe Üniv., Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
  2. Arda, Orhan (1961-62), Anıt Kabir, Mimarlık ve Sanat, C.1, S. 4-5.
  3. Aslanapa, Oktay (1996), Türk Cumhuriyetleri Mimarlık Abideleri, Ankara.
  4. Aslanoğlu, İnci (1994), Ankara’da Yirmi Yılın Mimarlık Değerlendirmesi: 1940-1960. Enis Batur (Ed.), Ankara Ankara, 227-242, İstanbul: YKY.
  5. Aslanoğlu, İnci (2000), 1928-1946 Döneminde Ankara’da Yapılan Resmi Yapıların Mimarisinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ayşıl Tükel Yavuz (Derleyen), Tarih İçinde Ankara, 271-286, Ankara: ODTÜ - Ankaralılar Vakfı.
  6. Ateş, Mehmet (1996), Mitolojiler Semboller ve Halılar, İstanbul.
  7. Azak, Gürbüz (1993), 3000 Türk Motifi ,İstanbul.
  8. Batur, Afife (2001), Anıtkabir, Büyük Ölümün Patetik Yontusu, Ozan Sağdıç, Anıtkabir,Anıtkabir, Ankara

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Alev Çakmakoğlu Kuru
GAZI UNIV
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 28, 2017

Submission Date

February 8, 2017

Acceptance Date

April 17, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 26 Number: 1

APA
Çakmakoğlu Kuru, A. (2017). ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, 26(1), 69-93. https://doi.org/10.29135/std.290790
AMA
1.Çakmakoğlu Kuru A. ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-. STD. 2017;26(1):69-93. doi:10.29135/std.290790
Chicago
Çakmakoğlu Kuru, Alev. 2017. “ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-”. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 26 (1): 69-93. https://doi.org/10.29135/std.290790.
EndNote
Çakmakoğlu Kuru A (April 1, 2017) ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 26 1 69–93.
IEEE
[1]A. Çakmakoğlu Kuru, “ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-”, STD, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 69–93, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.29135/std.290790.
ISNAD
Çakmakoğlu Kuru, Alev. “ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-”. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi 26/1 (April 1, 2017): 69-93. https://doi.org/10.29135/std.290790.
JAMA
1.Çakmakoğlu Kuru A. ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-. STD. 2017;26:69–93.
MLA
Çakmakoğlu Kuru, Alev. “ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-”. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, vol. 26, no. 1, Apr. 2017, pp. 69-93, doi:10.29135/std.290790.
Vancouver
1.Alev Çakmakoğlu Kuru. ANITKABİR’DEKİ RENKLİ TAŞ SÜSLEMELER -İkonografik Bir Yaklaşım-. STD. 2017 Apr. 1;26(1):69-93. doi:10.29135/std.290790

Cited By