Ecocentric and anthropocentric worldviews: are they incompatible?

Year 2024, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 146 - 158, 30.06.2024

Hélder Spínola

https://doi.org/10.55290/steam.1395926

Abstract

The dialectic between ecocentrism and anthropocentrism has become the central discussion around the growing ecological crisis we live and the purpose of environmental education. This study seeks to clarify the compatibility between these two worldviews and reflect on the extent to which they are in opposing camps on the concern about the ecological crisis. The New Ecological Paradigm Scale was applied to two independent samples of Portuguese students (9th grade and higher education students’) with which subscales for ecocentrism and anthropocentrism worldviews were selected through factor analysis. Our results show that more than 40% of those that agree with ecocentrism does not rejects anthropocentrism, being mostly neutral to that worldview and some even agreeing with it. In face of this, we purpose further studies on the different anthropocentric facets to selected those that may be included in environmental education effort to help, together with ecocentrism, to fight back ecological crisis.

Keywords

New Ecological Paradigm, Environmental attitude, Ecocentrism, Anthropocentrism, Environmental education.

Ethical Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest with this work.

Supporting Institution

This work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (project UIDB/04083/2020, Portuguese Government funds).

References

• Albarracín, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, G. T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and Scope. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–19). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Atav, E., Altunoğlu, B.D., & Sönmez, S. (2015). The determination of the environmental attitudes of secondary education students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1391-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.765
• Bartlett, M.S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296-298.
• Black, I.R., Shaw, D., & Trebeck, K. (2017). A policy agenda for changing our relationship with consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 12-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.182
• Blaikie, N.W.H. (1992). The nature and origins of ecological world views: an Australian study. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 144-165.
• Castro, P., & Lima M.L. (2001). Old and new ideas about the environment and science: an exploratory study. Environmental Behaviour, 33, 400–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973052
• Denis, H.D., & Pereira, L.N. (2014). Measuring the level of endorsement of the new environmental paradigm: a transnational study. Dos Algarves A Multidiscip e-J 23, 4–26.
• Dunlap, R.E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3-18.
• Dunlap, R.E., & Van Liere, K.D. (1978). ‘The New Environmental Paradigm: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results’. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
• Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., & Jones, R.E. (2000). ‘Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale’. Journal of Sociology, 56, 425–442.
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes’. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Earth Overshoot Day. (2022). Past Earth Overshoot Days. https://www.overshootday.org/newsroom/past-earth-overshoot-days/
• Gardner, G.T., & Stern, P.C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Hallfreðsdóttir, S. (2011). Eco Schools – Are They Really Better? Comparison of Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Actions between Students in Environmentally Certified Schools and Traditional Schools in Iceland. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of Lund University International Master’s. Programme in Environmental Studies and Sustainability Science (LUMES). Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, LUND, Sweden.
• Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem. Environmental Values, 6(1), 49–63.
• Igbokwe, A. B. (2012). Environmental literacy assessment: exploring the potential for the assessment of environmental education/programs in ontario schools. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 3 (1), 640-656.
• IPCC (2023). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
• Kaiser, H. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Kilbourne, W.E., Beckmann, S.C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: a multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55 (3), 193-204.
• Kopnina, H. (2015). Revisiting the Lorax complex: Deep ecology and biophilia in cross-cultural perspective. Environmental Sociology, 43(4), 315-324.
• Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & Piccolo, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics, 31, 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1.
• Kortenkamp, K.V., & Moore, C.F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: Moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 1-12.
• Krnel D., & Naglič, S. (2009). Environmental literacy comparison between eco-schools and ordinary schools in Slovenia. Science Education International, 20(1/2), 5-24.
• Kuhlemeier, H., Bergh, H., & Lagerweij, N. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Dutch secondary education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30 (2), 4-14.
• López-Bonilla, L.M., & López-Bonilla, J. M. (2016). From the new environmental paradigm to the brief ecological paradigm: a revised scale in golf tourism. Anatolia, 27(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2015.1100128.
• McBeth, W., & Volk, T.L. (2010). The national environmental literacy project: A baseline study of middle grade students in United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55-67.
• Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2004). The structure of environmental attitudes: a first and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 289–303.
• Milfont, T.L. & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80-94.
• Norton, B.G. (1984). Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics, 6 (2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846233
• Ntanos, S., Kyriakopoulos, G., Skordoulis, M., Chalikias, M. & Arabatzis, G. (2019). An application of the new environmental paradigm (NEP) scale in a Greek context. Energies, 12, 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020239
• Pe'er, S., Goldman, D., & Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 45-59.
• Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. Taylor & Francis.
• Sessions, G.S. (1974). Anthropocentrism and the environmental crisis. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 2(1), 71–81.
• Shoreman-Ouimet, E., & Kopnina, H. (2016). Conservation and culture: Beyond anthropocentrism. Routledge.