Amanos Dağları'nda Chrysopa Leach, 1815 Cinsinin Habitat Karakterizasyonu

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Amanos Dağları’nda Chrysopa Leach 1815 (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae)’nın habitat gereksinim ve karakterizasyonu analiz edilmiştir. Habitat kalite değerlendirmesinde biyolojik indikatör olarak büyük bir potansiyel değeri olan ve bunun yanısıra ekolojide biyolojik ajan olarak hayati önem taşıyan bu cinsin habitat tercih ve karakterizasyonu çok az bilinmektedir. Çalışma alanında, cinsin 102 farklı lokaliteden 344 örneği toplanmıştır. Çalışma, dantela kanatlıların habitat tabanlı interaksiyonlarının aydınlatılması adına öncül bir adım niteliğindedir.Bu çalışma, Chrysopa cinsinin habitat karakterizasyon ve niteliğinin etkisini değerlendirmek için yapılmıştır.

Keywords

• Neuroptera,Tür Çeşitliliği,Habitat Değerlendirmesi,Amanos Dağları,Chrysopa

Habitat Characterisation of Chrysopa Leach, 1815 Genus in the Amanos Mountains

Abstract

We analyzed habitat requirements and characterisation of Chrysopa genus Leach 1815 (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae) in the Amanos Mountains. The genus habitat characterisation and preferring poorly known, although they play a vital role as biological agents in ecology, and have great potential significance as biological indicators for assessing habitat quality. This genus has been found at 102 locations with 344 specimens, standing pine trees, characterized by large diameter, but avoided trees in north locations. This paper represents a first Pioneer step towards elucidating an habitat-based interaction of biological integrity for lacewings interaction assessment. This study was carried out to the impact of habitat quality and characterisation on the Chrysopa genus and abundancy of the different forest and several vegetation systems.

Keywords

• Species diversity,Habitat assesment,Amanos Mountains,Neuroptera,Chrysopa

References

1. Hunter, M.D., Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects., Agricultural and Forest Entomology (2002) 4, 159-166.
2. Chima, U.D., Omokhua G.E. And Iganibo-Beresibo E. Insect Specıes Dıversıty in Fragmented Habitats of the University of Port HARCOURT, NIGERIA ARPN Journal Of Agricultural And Biological Science vol. 8, No. 2, February, 2013., 160-168.
3. Brooks, S.J. 1994. A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Entomology Series 63(2): 137-210.
4. Brooks, S.J. & P.C. Barnard. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History, Entomology Series 59: 117-286.
5. Freitas, S. & N.D. Penny. 2001. The green lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agroecosystems. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 52: 245-395.
6. Semeria, Y. 1977. Discussion de la validité taxonomique du sous-genre Chrysoperla Steinmann. Nouvelle Revue d'Entomologie 7: 235-238.
7. Steinmann, H. 1964. The Chrysopa species (Neuroptera) of Hungary. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationales Hungarici 56: 257-266.
8. Tjeder, B. 1966. Neuroptera - Planipennia 5. Family Chrysopidae. South African Animal Life 12: 228-534.

9. Duelli, P., Johnston, J.B., Waldburger, M., Henry, C.S. A New Look at Adaptive Body Coloration and Color Change in “Common Green Lacewings” of the Genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)., Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 107(2): 382-388 (2014).
10. Avgın, S.S. Notes on the Bembidiina (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Bembidiini) from the Amanos Mountains, Turkey., The Coleopterists Bulletin, 68(1): 131–138. 2014.
11. Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U. and Hölzel, H. 1980. Die Neuropteren Europas. Goecke and Evers, Krefeld, Oesterreich, pp. 1-495, pp. 1-355. Şengonca, Ç. 1980. Türkiye Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) faunası üzerinde sistematik ve taksonomik araştırmalar. Zirai Mücadele ve Zirai Karantina Genel Müdürlüğü Matbaa Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
12. Ari, İsmail, Metin Aktaş, and Suat Kiyak. "Notes on the Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) fauna of Ardahan, Iğdır and Kars provinces of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology 31.3 (2007): 201-208.
13. Güzelmansur, A., Lise, Y., Amanos Dağları’nın Biyoçeşitliliği., MKU Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 (2): 55-68, 2013.
14. Stockdale, E. A., Lampkin, N. H., Hovi, M., Keatinge, R., Lennartsson, E. K. M., Macdonald, D. W., & Watson, C. A. (2001). Agronomic and environmental implications of organic farming systems. Advances in Agronomy, 70, 261-327.
15. Abed, T. and Stephens, N.C. (2002). Tree measurement manual for farm foresters - Practical guidelines for farm foresters undertaking basic inventory in farm forest plantation stands, National Forest Inventory, BRS, Canberra.
16. Gibbons, P., and Freudenberger, D. (2006). An overview of methods to assess vegetation condition at the scale of the site. Ecological Management and Restoration 7, S10-S17.