Selçuk Üniversitesi Alâeddin Keykubat Kampüsü’nde Yayılış Gösteren Bazı Bitkilerin Polen Morfolojileri

Year 2016, Volume: 42 Issue: 1, 42 - 56, 01.06.2016

Burcu Yılmaz Cıtak Hüseyin Dural Burcu Gönen

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Selçuk Üniversitesi Alâeddin Keykubat Kampüsü ve çevresinde yayılış gösteren 13 familyaya ait 26 cinsin (27 takson) polen morfolojilerini ışık mikroskobu ile belirlemektir. Araştırılan taksonların polenleri, 16,54-77,2 µm arasında polar eksene, 16,10-73,9 µm arasında ise ekvatoral eksene sahiptirler. En büyük polenlere Scabiosa argentea, en küçüklerine ise Bupleurum rotundifolium türünde rastlanmıştır. Araştırılan taksonların polen şekilleri genellikle prolat-sferoidal iken, subprolat ve prolat şeklinde polenlere de rastlanmıştır. Fumaria, Diplotaxis ve Echinophora cinslerinde ise sırasıyla sadece suboblat, oblat-sferoidal ve perprolat polen şekli tespit edilmiştir. Apertür tipi olarak çalışılan polenlerde genellikle trikolpat veya trikolporat tip belirlenirken, ekzin de ise genellikle retikulat ekzin skülptürü gözlemlenmiştir. Taksonların ekzin ve intin kalınlıkları sırasıyla 0,7-6,1 µm; 0,4-1,9 µm arasında değişmektedir.

Keywords

Polen, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Konya.

Pollen Morphology of Some Taxa Distributed in Alâeddin Keykubat Campus of Selcuk University

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to investigate pollen morphology of 27 taxa (25 genera) which belong to 13 families distributed in Alâeddin Keykubat Campus of Selçuk University and its surrounding. Pollen of studied taxa have between 16.54-77.2 µm in polar axis and 16.10-73.9 µm in equatorial axis. The biggest pollen was found in Scabiosa argentea and the smallest one was found in Bupleurum rotundifolium. Pollen shapes of studied taxa are generally prolate-spheroidal but also they were found in subprolate and prolate shape. In Fumaria, Diplotaxis and Echinophora genera only suboblate, oblate-spheroidal and perprolate pollen shape were identified. Aperture type was usually tricolpate or tricolporate in studied pollen taxa, it was generally observed reticulate ornamentation in exine sculpturing. Exine thickness and intine thickness were varied between 0.7-6.1 µm, 0.4-1.9 µm, respectively

Keywords

Pollen, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Fabaceae, Konya.

References

• Argue CL (1986). Pollen morphology of Amphianthus, Arianema, Curanga, Glossstigma, and Peplidium (Scrophulariaceae Gratioleae), American Journal of Botany 73, 1570–1576.
• Avcı S, Sancak C, Can A, Acar A, Pınar NM (2013). Pollen morphology of the genus Onobrychis (Fabaceae) in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Botany 37, 669–681.
• Azizi H, Sheidai M, Nouroozi M (2013). Palynological study of the genus Carduus L. (Asteraceae) in Iran, Iranian Journal of Botany 19, 211–220.
• Bazarragchaa B, Myoung LS, Yuon LH (2012). Pollen Morphology of the Family Lamiaceae in Mongolia, Journal of Korean Nature 5, 169–179.
• Chaturvedi M, Yunus D, Datta K (1995). Pollen morphology of Cicer L. wild and cultivated annual species, Feddes Repertorium 106, 29–37.
• Davis PH (1965–1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol. 1-10, Edinburgh University Press.
• De Leonardis W, De Santis C, Ferrauto G, Fichera G (2009). Pollen morphology of six species of Bupleurum L. (Apiaceae) present in Sicily and taxonomic implications, Plant Biosystems 143, 293–300.
• Erdtman G (1952). Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy: Angiosperms, Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Massachusettes.
• Erkara İP, Köse YB, Osoydan K, Yücel E (2015). Pollen morphology of some endemic Turkish Centaurea L. (Asteraceae, section Phaloletis) and their taxonomic value, Plant Systematics and Evolution 298, 1111–1117.
• Ghanavati F, Amirabadizadeh H (2012). Pollen grain morphology in Iranian Hedysareae (Fabaceae), Crop Breeding Journal 2, 25–33.
• Güler Ü, Pehlivan S (2006). Pollen morphology of some species belonging to Codonoprasum and Allium sections of Allium (Liliaceae-Alliaceae) genus, Biologia 61, 449–455.
• Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (2012). Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler), Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını, İstanbul.
• Hasani R, Mazooji A, Sharifnia F (2011). Biosystematics study of Consolida persica (Boiss.) Schrod. & Consolida rugulosa (Boiss.) Schrod. (Ranunculaceae) in Iran, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5, 1160–1166.
• İnceoğlu Ö (1982). PolIen grains in some Turkish Rhinantheae (Scrophulariaceae), Grana Palynology 21, 83–96.
• Jafari E, Ghanbarian G (2007). Pollen morphological studies on selected taxa of Asteraceae, Journal of Plant Sciences 2, 195–201.
• Kahraman A, Çıldır H, Doğan M, Güneş F, Celep F (2012). Pollen morphology of the genus Lathyrus L. (Fabaceae) with emphasis on its systematic implications, Austrilian Journal of Crop Science 6, 559–566.
• Karavelioğulları FA, Çelik S, Başer B (2005). Morphological and autecological study Verbascum suworowianum (C.Koch) O. Kuntze. var. suworowianum and var. papillosum (Murb.) Hub.-Mor. (Scrophulariaceae) in the Northeast Anatolia, International Journal of Botany 1, 79–84.
• Kargıoğlu M, Tatlı A (1994). S.Ü. Alâeddin Keykubat Kampüsü (Konya) alanı ve çevresinin florasına katkılar, Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 12, 53–68.
• Karim FM, El-Oqlah AA (1989). Palynological studies in the family Scrophulariaceae from Jordan and Iraq, Polen et Spore 31, 203–214.
• Kaya Z, Orcan N, Binzet R (2010). Morphological, anatomical and palynological study of Centaurea calcitrapa ssp. cilicica (Boiss. & Bal.) Wagenitz and Centaurea solstitialis ssp. carneola (boiss.) Wagenitz endemic for Turkey, Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 59–69.
• Keshavarzi M, Ebrahimzade Araii F, Habibi Tirtash F, Sheidaii M (2011). Pollen morphology of the genus Fumaria L. (Papaveraceae) in Iran, Iranian Journal of Botany 17, 98–104.
• Khalik KA, Van Den Berg RG, Van Der Maesen LJG, El Hadidi MN (2002). Pollen morphology of some tribes of Brassicaceae from Egypt and its systematic implications, Feddes Repertorium 113, 211–223.
• Kheiri S, Khayami M (2006). Pollen morphology of some species of Verbascum (Scrophulariaceae) in Urmia, Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 434–436.
• Lashin GMA (2006). Comparative morphology of pollen grains of some taxa of tribe Trifolieae (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) from Egypt, International Journal of Botany 2, 270–277.
• Minareci E, Altan Y, Aktan T (2011). A new record from Turkey: Consolida samia P.H. Davis (Ranunculaceae), The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 21, 552–555.
• Minki JP, Eshbaugh WH (1989). PolIen morphology of the Orobanchaceae and rhinanthoid Scrophulariaceae, Grana 28, 1–18.
• Moore PD, Webb JA (1978). An illustrated guide to pollen analysis, Hodder and Stoughton, London.
• Mutlu B, Erik S (2012). Pollen morphology and its taxonomic significance of the genus Arabis (Brassicaceae) in Turkey, Plant Systematics and Evolution 298, 1931– 1946.
• Orcan N, Binzet R (2003). The anatomical and palynological properties of Alyssum obtusifolium Steven ex DC. (Brassicaceae), Turkish Journal of Botany 27, 63–68.
• Özbek F, Özbek MU, Ekici M (2014). Morphological, anatomical, pollen and seed morphological properties of Melilotus bicolor Boiss. & Balansa (Fabaceae) endemic to Turkey, Austrilian Journal of Crop Science 8, 543–549.
• Pehlivan S (1995). Pollen morphology of some Turkish endemic Centaurea, Grana 34, 29– 38.
• Pehlivan S, Başer B, Karavelioğulları F (2008). Pollen morphology of the genus Verbascum L. (Group A) in Turkey, Biological Diversity and Conservation 1, 1–24.
• Perveen A, Qaiser M (1998). Pollen flora of Pakistan–VIII Leguminosae (Subfamily: Papilionoideae), Turkish Journal of Botany 22, 73–91.
• Perveen A, Qaiser M (2003). Pollen morphology of the family Labiatae From Pakistan, Pakistan Journal of Botany 35, 671–693.
• Perveen A, Qaiser M, Khan R (2004). Pollen flora of Pakistan-XLVII. Brassicaceae, Pakistan Journal of Botany 36, 683–700.
• Perveen A, Qaiser M (2011). Pollen flora of Pakistan-LXVIII. Dipsacaceae, Pakistan Journal of Botany 43, 2825–2827.
• Perveen A, Qaiser M (2012). Pollen flora of Pakistan -LXIX. Poaceae, Pakistan Journal of Botany 44, 747–756.
• Pınar NM, Adıgüzel N, Geven F (2007). Seed coat macrosculpturing in some Turkish Aethionema R. Br. (Brassicaceae), Pakistan Journal of Botany 39, 1025–1036.
• Pınar NM, Ekici M, Aytaç Z, Akan H, Çeter T, Alan Ş (2009). Pollen morphology of Astragalus L. sect. Onobrychoidei DC. (Fabaceae) in Turkey, Turkish Journal of Botany 33, 291–303.
• Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A (2007). Glossary of pollen and spore terminology, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143, 1–81.
• Qureshi SJ, Khan MA, Subhan K (2008). Comparative morphology, palynology and anatomy of two Asteraceae species, Trakia Journal of Sciences 6, 52–61.
• Salmaki Y, Jamzad Z, Zarre S, Bräuchler C (2008). Pollen morphology of Stachys (Lamiaceae) in Iran and its systematic implication, Flora 203, 627–639.
• Scheel R, Ybert JP, Barth OM (1996). Pollen morphology of the Boraginaceae from Santa Catarina State (southern Brazil), with comments on the taxonomy of the family, Grana 35, 138–153.
• Shabestari ESB, Attar F, Riahi H, Sheidai M (2013). Pollen morphology of Centaurea L. (Asteraceae) in Iran, Acta Botanica Brasilica 27, 669–679.
• Stix E (1960). Pollenmorphologische untersuchungen an Compositen, Grana Palynologica 2, 41–104.
• Wodehouse RP (1935). Pollen Grains, Mc Grew Hill, New York.
• Xavier KS, Mildner RA, Rogers CM (1980). Pollen morphology of Linmti, sect. Linastrum (Linaceae), Grana 19, 183–188.
• Varghese TM (1986). Studies in the family Scrophulariaceae, II. Pollen morphology. Palynology 4, 91–97.