Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Energy Efficient Construction Materials for Arctic Homes

Year 2017, Volume: 43 Issue: 2, 103 - 112, 31.10.2017

Abstract

Residential sector of Alaska accounts for about 8%
of the total national energy consumption. Space heating accounts for 72% of the
total residential energy consumption. Many studies are conducted to model
building energy consumption in different climates. However, there are very few
studies about the most efficient building constructions for Alaska climate. In
this study, heating energy consumption of a single detached dwelling in
Anchorage and Fairbanks Alaska is modelled by means of eQUEST software. The
results show that most energy efficient roof, wall and door construction
materials are wood. House with dark colored roof and wall are estimated to
consume 2% less energy for heating compared to light colored ones. Most energy
efficient window glazing is concluded to be 12 mm argon filled triple glazing.
In addition, the effect on the energy consumption of direction of doors and
windows is also investigated. 

References

  • AEDG (2016). Community Data Summary: Anchorage. Alaska Energy Data Gateway: https://akenergygateway.alaska.edu/community-data-summary/1398242/
  • Andersen PD, Jiménez MJ, Madsen H, Rode C (2014). Characterization of heat dynamics of an arctic low-energy house with floor heating. Building Simulation 595–614.
  • Barrett J (2014). Towards Net Zero: An Analysis of Building Orientation in the Reduction of Energy Load Requirements in High Latitudes. Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph - School of Environmental Design and Rural Development.
  • Bjarløv SP, Vladykova P (2011). The potential and need for energy saving in standard family detached. Building and Enviroment (46): 1525–1536.
  • ClimaTemps (2016). Average Temperatures in Anchorage, Alaska, Usa. http://www.anchorage.climatemps.com/temperatures.php
  • Cornick S, Rousseau M, Parekh A (2009). An energy simulation study of wall systems for Canadian Arctic Homes. Fourth International Building Physics Conference: Energy Efficiency and New Approaches, İstanbul.
  • EIA-AK (2016). Rankings: Total Energy Consumed per Capita, 2013. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=AK
  • EIA-CO2 Emissions (2016). State Carbon Dioxide Emissions. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/state/
  • EIA-Electricity Price (2016). Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector. U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a
  • EIA-Energy Consumption (2016). Energy Consumption Estimates per Capita by End-Use Sector, Ranked by State, 2013. U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/data.cfm?incfile=/state/seds/sep_sum/html/rank_use_capita.html&sid=US
  • EIA-NG Price (2016). Rankings: Natural Gas Residential Prices, November 2015. http://www.eia.gov/state/rankings/?sid=AK#/series/28
  • EIA-RECS (2016). Residential Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/
  • eQUEST (2016). the QUick Energy Simulation Tool. DOE2: http://www.doe2.com/equest/
  • Pride DJ (2017). Valuing Residential Energy Efficiency in Two Alaska Real Estate Markets: A Hedonic Approach. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Fairbanks.
  • Schiavon S, Melikov AK (2008). Energy-saving strategies with personalized ventilation in cold climates. Energy and Buildings (41): 543–550.
  • Vladykova P (2011). An energy efficient building for the Arctic climate. Kongens Lyngby: DTU Civil Engineering Report R-243.

Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri

Year 2017, Volume: 43 Issue: 2, 103 - 112, 31.10.2017

Abstract

Alaska’da konut sektörü, toplam ulusal enerji tüketiminin yaklaşık % 8’ini
oluşturmaktadır. Toplam konut enerji tüketiminin % 72’sini alan ısıtması oluşturmaktadır.
Farklı iklimlerde bina enerji tüketimini modellemek için birçok çalışma
yapılmıştır. Bununla birlikte, Alaska iklimi için en verimli bina yapıları
hakkında az sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Alaska Anchorage ve
Fairbanks’daki bir müstakil
konutun ısıtma enerji tüketimi, eQUEST yazılımı vasıtasıyla modellenmiştir.
Sonuçlar, enerji tasarruflu en fazla çatı, duvar ve kapı inşaat malzemelerinin
ahşap olduğunu göstermektedir. Koyu renkli çatı ve duvarları olan konutların
açık renkli olanlara kıyasla ısıtma için % 2 daha az enerji tükettiği tahmin
edilmiştir. Enerji tasarrufu en yüksek pencere camının, 12 mm argon boşluklu
üçlü cam olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Buna ek olarak, kapı ve pencerelerin
yönünün enerji tüketimi üzerindeki etkisi de araştırılmıştır.

References

  • AEDG (2016). Community Data Summary: Anchorage. Alaska Energy Data Gateway: https://akenergygateway.alaska.edu/community-data-summary/1398242/
  • Andersen PD, Jiménez MJ, Madsen H, Rode C (2014). Characterization of heat dynamics of an arctic low-energy house with floor heating. Building Simulation 595–614.
  • Barrett J (2014). Towards Net Zero: An Analysis of Building Orientation in the Reduction of Energy Load Requirements in High Latitudes. Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph - School of Environmental Design and Rural Development.
  • Bjarløv SP, Vladykova P (2011). The potential and need for energy saving in standard family detached. Building and Enviroment (46): 1525–1536.
  • ClimaTemps (2016). Average Temperatures in Anchorage, Alaska, Usa. http://www.anchorage.climatemps.com/temperatures.php
  • Cornick S, Rousseau M, Parekh A (2009). An energy simulation study of wall systems for Canadian Arctic Homes. Fourth International Building Physics Conference: Energy Efficiency and New Approaches, İstanbul.
  • EIA-AK (2016). Rankings: Total Energy Consumed per Capita, 2013. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=AK
  • EIA-CO2 Emissions (2016). State Carbon Dioxide Emissions. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/state/
  • EIA-Electricity Price (2016). Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector. U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a
  • EIA-Energy Consumption (2016). Energy Consumption Estimates per Capita by End-Use Sector, Ranked by State, 2013. U.S. Energy Information Administration: https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/data.cfm?incfile=/state/seds/sep_sum/html/rank_use_capita.html&sid=US
  • EIA-NG Price (2016). Rankings: Natural Gas Residential Prices, November 2015. http://www.eia.gov/state/rankings/?sid=AK#/series/28
  • EIA-RECS (2016). Residential Energy Consumption Survey. U.S. Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/
  • eQUEST (2016). the QUick Energy Simulation Tool. DOE2: http://www.doe2.com/equest/
  • Pride DJ (2017). Valuing Residential Energy Efficiency in Two Alaska Real Estate Markets: A Hedonic Approach. Fairbanks: University of Alaska Fairbanks.
  • Schiavon S, Melikov AK (2008). Energy-saving strategies with personalized ventilation in cold climates. Energy and Buildings (41): 543–550.
  • Vladykova P (2011). An energy efficient building for the Arctic climate. Kongens Lyngby: DTU Civil Engineering Report R-243.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Environmental Sciences
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gül Nihal Güğül

Publication Date October 31, 2017
Submission Date October 31, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 43 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Güğül, G. N. (2017). Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 43(2), 103-112.
AMA Güğül GN. Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri. sufefd. October 2017;43(2):103-112.
Chicago Güğül, Gül Nihal. “Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 43, no. 2 (October 2017): 103-12.
EndNote Güğül GN (October 1, 2017) Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 43 2 103–112.
IEEE G. N. Güğül, “Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri”, sufefd, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 103–112, 2017.
ISNAD Güğül, Gül Nihal. “Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 43/2 (October 2017), 103-112.
JAMA Güğül GN. Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri. sufefd. 2017;43:103–112.
MLA Güğül, Gül Nihal. “Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, vol. 43, no. 2, 2017, pp. 103-12.
Vancouver Güğül GN. Arktik Evleri için Enerji Verimli Yapı Malzemeleri. sufefd. 2017;43(2):103-12.

Journal Owner: On behalf of Selçuk University Faculty of Science, Rector Prof. Dr. Hüseyin YILMAZ
Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty accepts articles in Turkish and English with original results in basic sciences and other applied sciences. The journal may also include compilations containing current innovations.

It was first published in 1981 as "S.Ü. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi" and was published under this name until 1984 (Number 1-4).
In 1984, its name was changed to "S.Ü. Fen-Edeb. Fak. Fen Dergisi" and it was published under this name as of the 5th issue.
When the Faculty of Letters and Sciences was separated into the Faculty of Science and the Faculty of Letters with the decision of the Council of Ministers numbered 2008/4344 published in the Official Gazette dated 3 December 2008 and numbered 27073, it has been published as "Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty" since 2009.
It has been scanned in DergiPark since 2016.

88x31.png

Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.