Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Minimum Inhibition Concentration of an Antimicrobial Agent Containing Methylisothiazolinone Used in Leather Industry Against Reference Strains

Year 2018, Volume: 44 Issue: 2, 149 - 156, 11.10.2018

Abstract

In leather
industry soaking process is applied to salted hides and skins in order to
rehydrate, to soften, to remove the salt, blood, dung, dirt and microorganisms.
The soaking process is a favorable environment for bacterial growth, and during
this process significant damage occurs on the hides and skins.  It is known
that soaked hides/skins contain Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, which
can adversely affect hide/skin quality even though they are treated with
antimicrobial agents. Insufficient and random use of antimicrobial agents is
inadequate in controlling the numbers of these bacteria, and excessive use of
them also leads to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. The
choice of appropriate antimicrobial agent is very important in preventing
damage caused by bacteria found on the hides. Therefore, application of
methylisothiazolinone-containing antimicrobial agent used in the leather
industry against reference bacterial strains and investigation of the minimum
inhibitor concentration will provide important information on the effectiveness
of this antimicrobial agent on bacteria that may be harmful to hides in leather
processing.
In the present study, the eighteen different concentration
of antimicrobial agent containing methylisothiazolinone
were applied against Gram-negative (Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
ATCC27853, Escherichia
coli
ATCC25922) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus
epidermidis
ATCC12228, Staphylococcus
aureus
ATCC29213, Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341,
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212, Bacillus cereus ATCC11778, Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633) reference
strains and their mixed culture. The minimum inhibitor concentrations were
determined using agar dilution method. The minimum inhibitor concentrations of
antimicrobial agent were found as 5000 µg/ml for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213, Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341, mixed culture of test bacteria; 1250
µg/ml for Escherichia coli ATCC25922;
156 µg/ml for Bacillus cereus ATCC11778;
39 µg/ml for Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC12228
and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212;
and 9.76 µg/ml for Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633.
As a result, it was determined that the tested antimicrobial agent inhibited
the growth of eight different reference strains and their mixed culture, and
that spectrum of action was broad.

References

  • Adminis U, Money CA (2003). Short-term preservation of hides and skins. Leather International 26.
  • Akpolat C, Ventosa A, Birbir M, Sánchez-Porro C, Caglayan P (2015). Molecular identification of moderately halophilic bacteria and extremely halophilic archaea isolated from salted sheep skins containing red and yellow discoloratios. J Am Leather Chem As 110: 211–220.
  • Anonymous, EUCAST, European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) (2000). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution, EUCAST Definitive Document E. Def 3.1, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 6: 509–515.
  • Antic D, Blagojevic B, Ducic M, Nastasijevic I, Mitrovic R, Buncic S (2010). Distribution of microflora on cattle hides and its transmission to meat via direct contact. Food Control 21: 1025–1029.
  • Aslan E, Birbir M (2011). Examination of gram-positive bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. J Am Leather Chem As 106: 372–380.
  • Aslan E, Birbir M (2012). Examination of Gram-negative bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. J Am Leather Chem As 107: 106–115.
  • Bailey DG, Birbir M (1993). A study of the extremely halophilic microorganisms found on commercially brine-cured cattle hides. J Am Leather Chem As 88: 285–293.
  • Berber D, Birbir M (2010). Examination of bacterial populations in salt, salted hides, soaked hides and soak liquors. J Am Leather Chem As 105: 320–326.
  • Berber D, Birbir M, Hacıoğlu H (2010). Efficacy assesment of bactericide containing didecyldimethylammonium chloride on bacteria found in soak liquor at different exposure times. J Am Leather Chem As 11: 354–359.
  • Bilgehan H (2004). Clinical microbial identification. Barış Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Bilgi ST, Yapici BM, Yapici AN (2009). Determination of bacterial and fungal numbers in floats of pre-tanning operations. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 1602–1607.
  • Birbir M, Ilgaz A (1996). Isolation and identification of bacteria adversely affecting hide and leather quality. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 80: 147–153.
  • Birbir M, Ventosa A, Caglayan P (2015). Characterization of moderately halophilic bacteria found on the sheep and goat skins. The Scientific Research Project Commission of Marmara University, Project number FEN-C-DRP-040712-0281.
  • Birbir M, Yazıcı E (2016). Isolation and identification of bacterial species belonging to family Enterobacteriaceae on soaked hide and skin samples and determination of their antibiotic susceptibilities to different antibiotics. The Scientific Research Project Commission of Marmara University, Project number FEN-C-YLP-041213-0456.
  • Caglayan P, Birbir M, Ventosa A, Sánchez-Porro C (2015). Characterization of moderately halophilic bacteria from the salt-pack cured hides. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 5: 250–254.
  • Haines MB (1984). Quality rawstock. J Am Leather Chem As 4: 164–173.
  • Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol 86: 985–990.
  • Newton KG, Harrision JCL, Smith KM (1977). Coliforms from hides and meat. J Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 199–200.
  • Orlita A (2004). Microbial biodeterioration of leather and its control: A review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 53: 157–163.
  • Pfleiderer E, Reiner R (1988). Microorganisms in Processing of Leather in Biotechnology.
  • Rangarajan R, Didato TD, Bryant S (2003). Measurement of bacterial populations in typical tannery soak solutions by traditional and new approaches. J Am Leather Chem As 98: 477–485.
  • Ulusoy K, Birbir M (2015). Identification and metabolic activities of bacterial species belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae on salted cattle hides and sheep skins. J Am Leather Chem As 110: 86–199.
  • Veyselova C, Birbir M, Berber D (2013). Minimal bactericidal concentration for a quaternary ammonium compound used in soak liquors. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 4(97): 166–171.
  • Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW (2008). Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3: 163–175.
  • Yapıcı AN, Yapıcı BM (2002). Deri işletmelerinde karşılaşılan mikrobiyal olaylar ve kullanılan mikrobisidler. Teknik Bülten 34.
  • Yapıcı BM, Yapıcı AN, Karaboz İ, Tozan M (2004). Deri sektöründe kullanılan bazı bakterisitlerin etkinliğinin tespiti üzerine bir araştırma. I. Ulusal Deri Sempozyumu, İzmir, 7-8 Ekim.

Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu

Year 2018, Volume: 44 Issue: 2, 149 - 156, 11.10.2018

Abstract

Deri endüstrisinde tuzlanmış deriye kaybettiği suyun geri
kazandırılması, derinin yumuşatılması, derideki tuzun, kanın, gübrenin,
pisliğin ve mikroorganizmaların uzaklaştırılması amacıyla ıslatma işlemi
uygulanmaktadır. Islatma işlemi bakterilerin gelişmesi için oldukça uygun bir
ortam olup, bu süreçte derilerde önemli hasarlar meydana gelmektedir. I
slatılmış deriler antimikrobiyal maddelerle muamele
edilmesine rağmen, bu derilerin kalitesini olumsuz etkileyebilecek gram-pozitif
ve gram-negatif bakterileri içerdikleri bilinmektedir. Antimikrobiyal
maddelerin az ve rastgele kullanılması bu bakterilerin sayılarının kontrol
edilmesinde yetersiz kaldığı gibi, fazla kullanılması da antimikrobiyallere
dirençli bakterilerin ortaya çıkmasına sebep olmaktadır.
Uygun antimikrobiyal madde seçimi derilerde
bakterilerden kaynaklanan zararın önlenmesi açısından oldukça önemlidir.
Bu nedenle, deri endüstrisinde kullanılan bir
antimikrobiyal maddenin referans bakteri suşlarına karşı uygulanması ve minimum
inhibisyon konsantrasyonunun araştırılması, deri işlenti basamaklarında deriye
zarar verebilecek bakterilerin üzerine bu antimikrobiyal maddenin etkinliğinin
belirlenmesi açısından önemli bilgi verecektir. Bu çalışmada gram-negatif ve gram-pozitif
referans suşları ve bunların karışık kültürü üzerine metilizotiazolinon içeren
antimikrobiyal maddenin onsekiz farklı konsantrasyonu uygulanarak
minimum inhibisyon konsantrasyonu agar dilüsyon metodu
ile araştırılmıştır
. Minimum inhibisyon
konsantrasyon değerleri

Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ATCC27853, Staphylococcus
aureus
ATCC29213, Micrococcus luteus ATCC9341,
ve tüm test bakterilerinin karışık kültürü için 5000 µg/ml;
Escherichia coli ATCC25922 için 1250
µg/ml;
Bacillus cereus ATCC11778 için
156 µg/ml;
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC12228
ve
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC29212
için 39 µg/ml; ve
Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633
için ise 9.76 µg/ml olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, test edilen
antimikrobiyal maddenin sekiz farklı referans suşun ve bunların karışık
kültürünün gelişimlerini inhibe ettiği ve etki spektrumunun geniş olduğu
saptanmıştır.

References

  • Adminis U, Money CA (2003). Short-term preservation of hides and skins. Leather International 26.
  • Akpolat C, Ventosa A, Birbir M, Sánchez-Porro C, Caglayan P (2015). Molecular identification of moderately halophilic bacteria and extremely halophilic archaea isolated from salted sheep skins containing red and yellow discoloratios. J Am Leather Chem As 110: 211–220.
  • Anonymous, EUCAST, European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) (2000). Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution, EUCAST Definitive Document E. Def 3.1, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 6: 509–515.
  • Antic D, Blagojevic B, Ducic M, Nastasijevic I, Mitrovic R, Buncic S (2010). Distribution of microflora on cattle hides and its transmission to meat via direct contact. Food Control 21: 1025–1029.
  • Aslan E, Birbir M (2011). Examination of gram-positive bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. J Am Leather Chem As 106: 372–380.
  • Aslan E, Birbir M (2012). Examination of Gram-negative bacteria on salt-pack cured hides. J Am Leather Chem As 107: 106–115.
  • Bailey DG, Birbir M (1993). A study of the extremely halophilic microorganisms found on commercially brine-cured cattle hides. J Am Leather Chem As 88: 285–293.
  • Berber D, Birbir M (2010). Examination of bacterial populations in salt, salted hides, soaked hides and soak liquors. J Am Leather Chem As 105: 320–326.
  • Berber D, Birbir M, Hacıoğlu H (2010). Efficacy assesment of bactericide containing didecyldimethylammonium chloride on bacteria found in soak liquor at different exposure times. J Am Leather Chem As 11: 354–359.
  • Bilgehan H (2004). Clinical microbial identification. Barış Yayınları, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Bilgi ST, Yapici BM, Yapici AN (2009). Determination of bacterial and fungal numbers in floats of pre-tanning operations. Afr J Biotechnol 8: 1602–1607.
  • Birbir M, Ilgaz A (1996). Isolation and identification of bacteria adversely affecting hide and leather quality. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 80: 147–153.
  • Birbir M, Ventosa A, Caglayan P (2015). Characterization of moderately halophilic bacteria found on the sheep and goat skins. The Scientific Research Project Commission of Marmara University, Project number FEN-C-DRP-040712-0281.
  • Birbir M, Yazıcı E (2016). Isolation and identification of bacterial species belonging to family Enterobacteriaceae on soaked hide and skin samples and determination of their antibiotic susceptibilities to different antibiotics. The Scientific Research Project Commission of Marmara University, Project number FEN-C-YLP-041213-0456.
  • Caglayan P, Birbir M, Ventosa A, Sánchez-Porro C (2015). Characterization of moderately halophilic bacteria from the salt-pack cured hides. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 5: 250–254.
  • Haines MB (1984). Quality rawstock. J Am Leather Chem As 4: 164–173.
  • Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other plant extracts. J Appl Microbiol 86: 985–990.
  • Newton KG, Harrision JCL, Smith KM (1977). Coliforms from hides and meat. J Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 199–200.
  • Orlita A (2004). Microbial biodeterioration of leather and its control: A review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 53: 157–163.
  • Pfleiderer E, Reiner R (1988). Microorganisms in Processing of Leather in Biotechnology.
  • Rangarajan R, Didato TD, Bryant S (2003). Measurement of bacterial populations in typical tannery soak solutions by traditional and new approaches. J Am Leather Chem As 98: 477–485.
  • Ulusoy K, Birbir M (2015). Identification and metabolic activities of bacterial species belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae on salted cattle hides and sheep skins. J Am Leather Chem As 110: 86–199.
  • Veyselova C, Birbir M, Berber D (2013). Minimal bactericidal concentration for a quaternary ammonium compound used in soak liquors. J Soc Leath Tech Ch 4(97): 166–171.
  • Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW (2008). Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat Protoc 3: 163–175.
  • Yapıcı AN, Yapıcı BM (2002). Deri işletmelerinde karşılaşılan mikrobiyal olaylar ve kullanılan mikrobisidler. Teknik Bülten 34.
  • Yapıcı BM, Yapıcı AN, Karaboz İ, Tozan M (2004). Deri sektöründe kullanılan bazı bakterisitlerin etkinliğinin tespiti üzerine bir araştırma. I. Ulusal Deri Sempozyumu, İzmir, 7-8 Ekim.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Structural Biology
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Pınar Çağlayan 0000-0002-0238-1754

Publication Date October 11, 2018
Submission Date June 5, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 44 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çağlayan, P. (2018). Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, 44(2), 149-156.
AMA Çağlayan P. Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu. sufefd. October 2018;44(2):149-156.
Chicago Çağlayan, Pınar. “Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 44, no. 2 (October 2018): 149-56.
EndNote Çağlayan P (October 1, 2018) Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 44 2 149–156.
IEEE P. Çağlayan, “Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu”, sufefd, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2018.
ISNAD Çağlayan, Pınar. “Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi 44/2 (October 2018), 149-156.
JAMA Çağlayan P. Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu. sufefd. 2018;44:149–156.
MLA Çağlayan, Pınar. “Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Fen Dergisi, vol. 44, no. 2, 2018, pp. 149-56.
Vancouver Çağlayan P. Deri Endüstrisinde Kullanılan Metilizotiazolinon İçeren Antimikrobiyal Maddenin Referans Suşlar Üzerine Minimum İnhibisyon Konsantrasyonu. sufefd. 2018;44(2):149-56.

Journal Owner: On behalf of Selçuk University Faculty of Science, Rector Prof. Dr. Hüseyin YILMAZ
Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty accepts articles in Turkish and English with original results in basic sciences and other applied sciences. The journal may also include compilations containing current innovations.

It was first published in 1981 as "S.Ü. Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi" and was published under this name until 1984 (Number 1-4).
In 1984, its name was changed to "S.Ü. Fen-Edeb. Fak. Fen Dergisi" and it was published under this name as of the 5th issue.
When the Faculty of Letters and Sciences was separated into the Faculty of Science and the Faculty of Letters with the decision of the Council of Ministers numbered 2008/4344 published in the Official Gazette dated 3 December 2008 and numbered 27073, it has been published as "Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty" since 2009.
It has been scanned in DergiPark since 2016.

88x31.png

Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.