Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi

Necan Aydın; Dilek Göze Kaya

doi:10.52642/susbed.1289391

TR EN

Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi

Abstract

Çevre ile ilgili konular gün geçtikçe önem kazanırken, çevre üzerine yapılan akademik çalışmalarda hak ettiği değeri kazanmaya başlamıştır. Bibliyometrik ağ analizi akademik araştırma konularındaki en etkili yazar, dergi, ülke gibi birçok kategori açısından tarayıp filtrelemesi, konuların açıklarının belirlenmesi, çalışmaların etkisinin değerlendirilmesi açısından oldukça faydalıdır. Bu çalışma, STIRPAT (nüfus, refah ve teknoloji üzerine rasgele etkilerle regresyon), EKC (Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi) ve çevre vergileri üzerine odaklanan çalışmaların bibliyometrik ağ analizini konu almaktadır. Çevre üzerine bu üç başlık odağındaki çalışmalar incelendiğinde, literatüründeki en aktif ülkeler sırasıyla Çin, ABD ve Türkiye olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca analizde en etkili yazar, dergi ve atıf ağları da incelenmiştir. En etkili bulunan bazı kaynakların detaylı incelemesi yapılmıştır. Literatürdeki ana araştırma konularını ve kümelerini belirlemek, potansiyel araştırma boşluklarının tespitine olanak sağlayacaktır. Genel olarak çalışma, STIRPAT, EKC ve çevre vergileri konularına kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sunmakta ve çevre konularına ilgi duyan araştırmacılar ve politika yapıcılar için faydalı bir kaynak oluşturmaktadır.

Keywords

Bibliyometrik analiz, STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergileme.

Bibliometric Network Analysis of Studies Focused on STIRPAT, EKC And Environmental Taxation Issues in the Literature

Abstract

As environmental issues become increasingly important, academic research on the environment is starting to gain the value it deserves. Bibliometric network analysis is very useful in terms of scanning and filtering many categories such as the most influential author, journal, and country in academic research topics, identifying gaps in topics, and evaluating the impact of studies. This study focuses on the bibliometric network analysis of studies focused on STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology), EKC (Environmental Kuznets Curve), and environmental taxation. When these three focus areas of studies on the environment are examined, it was found that the most active countries in the literature are China, the USA, and Turkey, respectively. Additionally, the most influential authors, journals, and citation networks are also examined, and a detailed examination is made of some of the most effective sources found. Determining the main research topics and clusters in the literature will allow for the study of potential research gaps. Overall, the study provides a comprehensive overview of STIRPAT, EKC, and environmental taxation and is a valuable resource for researchers and policymakers interested in environmental issues.

Keywords

Bibliometric Network Analysis, STIRPAT, EKC, Environmetal Taxation.

References

Acaravci, A., & Ozturk, I. (2010). On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy, 35(12), 5412–5420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.009
Akbostancı, E., Türüt-Aşık, S., & Tunç, G. İ. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(3), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
Alper, A. E. (2018). Analysis of Carbon Tax on Selected European Countries: Does Carbon Tax Reduce Emissions? Applied Economics and Finance, 5(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v5i1.2843
Apergis, N., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
Arouri, M. E. H., Ben Youssef, A., M’henni, H., & Rault, C. (2012). Energy consumption, economic growth and CO 2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries. Energy Policy, 45, 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018). How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy, 113(October 2017), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050
Barker, T., Junankar, S., Pollitt, H., & Summerton, P. (2007). Carbon leakage from unilateral Environmental Tax Reforms in Europe, 1995-2005. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6281–6292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.021
Bekmez, S., & Nakıpoğlu, F. (2012). Çevre Vergisi-Ekonomik Büyüme İkilemi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 641–658. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jss/issue/24238/256952
Bengochea-Morancho, A., Higón-Tamarit, F., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2001). Economic growth and CO2 emissions in the European Union. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011188401445
Bilgili, F., Koçak, E., & Bulut, Ü. (2016). The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080

Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
Bozkurt, C., & Okumuş, İ. (2015). Türkiye’de Ekonomi̇k Büyüme, Enerji Tüketi̇mi̇, Ti̇cari̇ Serbestleşme ve Nüfus Yoğunluğunun Co2 Emi̇syon Üzeri̇ndeki Etki̇leri̇: Yapısal Kırılmalı Eşbütünleşme Anali̇zi̇. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(32), 23–35.
Bruvoll, A., & Larsen, B. M. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions in Norway: Do carbon taxes work? Energy Policy, 32(4), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00151-4
Bruvoll, A., & Medin, H. (2003). Factors Behind the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Environmental & Resource Economics, 24(1), 27–48. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1022881928158%0Ahttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eih&AN=24826262&site=ehost-live
Cho, C. H., Chu, Y. P., & Yang, H. Y. (2014). An environment kuznets curve for GHG emissions: A panel cointegration analysis. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 9(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567241003773192
Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007
Cole, M. A., & Neumayer, E. (2004). Examining the Impact of Demographic Factors On Air Pollution. Population and Environment, 26(1), 5–21.
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027157
del Pilar Parra O., M., Saucedo A., E., & Díaz P., J. (2017). Estimating Environmental Kuznets Curve: the Impact of Environmental Taxes and Energy Consumption in Co2 Emissions of Oecd Countries. DIEM : Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 3(1), 901–912. https://hrcak.srce.hr/187438
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., & Pal, M. (2000). Air quality and economic growth: An empirical study. Ecological Economics, 34(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00179-8
Doğan, B., Chu, L. K., Ghosh, S., Diep Truong, H. H., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? Renewable Energy, 187, 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.077
Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Dökmen, G. (2012). Environmental Tax and Economic Growth: A Panel Var Analysis. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Haziran-Ar(40), 43–65. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/erciyesiibd/issue/5897/78021
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(March), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fan, Y., Liu, L. C., Wu, G., & Wei, Y. M. (2006). Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(4), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.007
Floros, N., & Vlachou, A. (2005). Energy demand and energy-related CO2 emissions in Greek manufacturing: Assessing the impact of a carbon tax. Energy Economics, 27(3), 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2004.12.006
Ghazouani, A., Jebli, M. Ben, & Shahzad, U. (2021). Impacts of environmental taxes and technologies on greenhouse gas emissions: contextual evidence from leading emitter European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 22758–22767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11911-9
Gökmenoğlu, K., & Taşpınar, N. (2016). The relationship between Co2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 25(5), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876
Gökmenoğlu, M., & Yavuz, İ. S. (2022). Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisine Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 52, 231–252. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.30794/pausbed.1088158
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, 13–56. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012
He, P., Ya, Q., Chengfeng, L., Yuan, Y., & Xiao, C. (2019). Nexus between Environmental Tax, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Evidence from China, Finland, and Malaysia Based on a Panel-ARDL Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1658068
Hill, R. J., & Magnani, E. (2002). An Exploration of the Conceptual and Empirical Basis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Australian Economic Papers, 41(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00162
Hotunluoğlu, H., & Tekeli, R. (2007). Karbon Vergisinin Ekonomik Analizi ve Etkileri: Karbon Vergisinin Emisyon Azaltıcı Etkisi Var Mı? Sosyoekonomi, 2, 107–126.
Hu, G., Wang, L., Ni, R., & Liu, W. (2020). Which h-index? An exploration within the Web of Science. Scientometrics, 123(3), 1225–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03425-5
Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003
Jalil, A., & Mahmud, S. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167–5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044
Kasman, A., & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.10.022
Katırcıoğlu, S., & Katırcıoğlu, S. (2018). Testing the role of urban development in the conventional Environmental Kuznets Curve: evidence from Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 25(11), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1361004
Kaufmann, R. K., Davidsdottir, B., Garnham, S., & Pauly, P. (1998). The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00181-X
Kılınç, E. C., & Altıparmak, H. (2020). Çevre Vergilerinin CO2 Emisyonu Üzerindeki Etkisi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 217–227.
Kotnik, Ž., Klun, M., & Škulj, D. (2014). The effect of taxation on greenhouse gas emissions. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 43, 168–185.
Li, H., Mu, H., Zhang, M., & Li, N. (2011). Analysis on influence factors of China’s CO2 emissions based on Path-STIRPAT model. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6906–6911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.056
Liddle, Brant, & Lung, S. (2010). Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: Revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts. Population and Environment, 31(5), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0101-5
Liddle, Brantley. (2015). What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates. Global Environmental Change, 31, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.016
Lin, B., & Li, X. (2011). The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5137–5146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.050
Lin, S., Zhao, D., & Marinova, D. (2009). Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(6), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.009
Liu, X., Zhang, S., & Bae, J. (2017). The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.086
Mania, E. (2020). Export Diversification and CO2 Emissions: An Augmented Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of International Development, 32(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3441
Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Maruotti, A. (2011). The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009
Mehmet Hanefi TOPAL, H. F. G. (2017). Çevre Vergilerinin Çevre Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Gelişmekte Olan ve Gelişmiş Ekonomilerden Ampirik Bir Kanıt. MALİYE ARAŞTIRMALARI DERGİSİ, 3(1), 63–83.
Metcalf, G. E. (2009). Environmental Taxation : What Have We Learned in This Decade ? Tax Policy Lessons from the 2000s, 7–44.
Morley, B. (2012). Empirical evidence on the effectiveness of environmental taxes. Applied Economics Letters, 19(18), 1817–1820. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.650324
Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
Ozatac, N., Gokmenoglu, K. K., & Taspinar, N. (2017). Testing the EKC hypothesis by considering trade openness, urbanization, and financial development: the case of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(20), 16690–16701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9317-6
Özcan, B. (2013). The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 62, 1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.016
Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.025
Öztürk, İ., & Acaravcı, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 3220–3225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
Pablo-Romero, M. del P., & Sánchez-Braza, A. (2017). Residential energy environmental Kuznets curve in the EU-28. Energy, 125, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.091
Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical Tests and Policy Analysis of Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Development (Issue January).
Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve : turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4, SPECIAL ISSUE: THE 'ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE'), 465–484. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44379189
Pao, H. T., & Tsai, C. M. (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
Polat, O. (2019). Environmental Taxes and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Eu Countries : A Panel Var Approach. Journal of Ebor, 1(1), 20–33.
Poumanyvong, P., & Kaneko, S. (2010a). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029
Poumanyvong, P., & Kaneko, S. (2010b). Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.029
Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of science (Wos) and scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Sadorsky, P. (2014). The effect of urbanization on CO2 emissions in emerging economies. Energy Economics, 41, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.007
Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhya, S. (1992). Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross-Country Evidence. In World Bank Publications (Vol. 904).
Shahbaz, M., Bhattacharya, M., & Ahmed, K. (2017). CO 2 emissions in Australia : economic and non- economic drivers in the long-run. Applied Economics, 49(13), 1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1217306
Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q. M. A., Tiwari, A. K., & Leitão, N. C. (2013). Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Muzaffar, A. T., Ahmed, K., & Ali Jabran, M. (2016). How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? the application of STIRPAT model. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 57, pp. 83–93). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.096
Shao, H., Kim, G., Li, Q., & Newman, G. (2021). Web of science-based green infrastructure: A bibliometric analysis in citespace. Land, 10(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070711
Şimsek, A., & Küçükesmen, E. (2021). Web of Science Veri̇ Tabanında Anali̇ti̇k Hi̇yerarşi̇ Prosesi̇yle İlgi̇li̇ Yayınların Bi̇bli̇yometri̇k Anali̇zi̇. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.47257/busad.1040086
Sinha, A., & Bhattacharya, J. (2017). Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for SO2 emission: A case of Indian cities. Ecological Indicators, 72, 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.018
Solakoglu, E. G. (2007). The effect of property rights on the relationship between economic growth and pollution for transition economies. Eastern European Economics, 45(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8775450104
Soytas, U., Sari, R., & Ewing, B. T. (2007). Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62(3–4), 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.009
Soytaş, U., & Sarı, R. (2009). Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics, 68(6), 1667–1675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.014
Stern, D. I. (2004). The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004
Stern, D. I., Common, M. S., & Barbier, E. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0
Tamazian, A., & Bhaskara Rao, B. (2010). Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Economics, 32(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.004
Tamazian, A., Chousa, J. P., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2009). Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37(1), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
Tekin, A., & Şaşmaz, M. Ü. (2016). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Ekolojik Riskleri Azaltmada Çevresel Vergilerin Etkisi: Avrupa Birliği Örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18657/yecbu.20984
Toprak, D. (2006). Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Çerçevesinde Çevre Politikaları ve Mali Araçlar. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(4), 146–169. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/215639
Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
Ulucak, R., & Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191
Wang, B., Pan, S. Y., Ke, R. Y., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. M. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y
Wang, C., Wang, F., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Su, Y., Ye, Y., & Zhang, H. (2017). Examining the driving factors of energy related carbon emissions using the extended STIRPAT model based on IPAT identity in Xinjiang. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 67, pp. 51–61). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.006
Wang, K. M. (2012). Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions from oil and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1537–1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.001
Wang, P., Wu, W., Zhu, B., & Wei, Y. (2013). Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy, 106, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.036
Yang, L., Xia, H., Zhang, X., & Yuan, S. (2018). What matters for carbon emissions in regional sectors? A China study of extended STIRPAT model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.116
Yavuz, N. Ç. (2014). CO2 Emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 9(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2011.567222
Yılmaz, B., & Şaşmaz, M. Ü. (2016). Karbon Vergisi, Ekonomik Büyüme ve CO2 Emisyonu Arasındaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Danimarka, Finlandiya, Hollanda, İsveç ve Norveç Örneği. International Journal of Applied Economic and Finance Studies, 1(1), 32–41.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5
Zaghdoudi, T., & Maktouf, S. (2017). Threshold effect in the relationship between environmental taxes and CO2 emissions: A PSTR specification. Economics Bulletin, 37(3).
Zaim, O., & Taşkın, F. (2000). A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: An application on OECD countries. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008318605976
Zhang, X. P., & Cheng, X. M. (2009). Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2706–2712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.011.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Theory of Treasury

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Necan Aydın ^*
0000-0002-7164-6066
Türkiye

Dilek Göze Kaya
0000-0003-3477-1877
Türkiye

Publication Date

August 31, 2023

Submission Date

April 28, 2023

Acceptance Date

June 23, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Number: 51

DOI

https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1289391

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA67SU85XD

APA

Aydın, N., & Göze Kaya, D. (2023). Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 51, 334-355. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1289391

AMA

1.Aydın N, Göze Kaya D. Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. SUSBED. 2023;(51):334-355. doi:10.52642/susbed.1289391

Chicago

Aydın, Necan, and Dilek Göze Kaya. 2023. “Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, nos. 51: 334-55. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1289391.

EndNote

Aydın N, Göze Kaya D (August 1, 2023) Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 51 334–355.

IEEE

[1]N. Aydın and D. Göze Kaya, “Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi”, SUSBED, no. 51, pp. 334–355, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.52642/susbed.1289391.

ISNAD

Aydın, Necan - Göze Kaya, Dilek. “Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 51 (August 1, 2023): 334-355. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.1289391.

JAMA

1.Aydın N, Göze Kaya D. Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. SUSBED. 2023;:334–355.

MLA

Aydın, Necan, and Dilek Göze Kaya. “Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi”. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, no. 51, Aug. 2023, pp. 334-55, doi:10.52642/susbed.1289391.

Vancouver

1.Necan Aydın, Dilek Göze Kaya. Literatürdeki STIRPAT, EKC, Çevre Vergisi Konularına Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Ağ Analizi. SUSBED. 2023 Aug. 1;(51):334-55. doi:10.52642/susbed.1289391

Cited By

VERGİ KAÇAKÇILIĞI KAVRAMININ ULUSLARARASI AKADEMİK MECRADA İZDÜŞÜMÜ: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1474986

24108 28027

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License