Geoffrey Chaucer’ın Canterbury Hikâyeleri Eserinde Toplumsal Cinsiyetin Sorunlu Temsili

Year 2021, , 236 - 243, 29.04.2021

Emrah Atasoy

https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.899293

Abstract

Geoffrey Chaucer’ın hacıların anlattıkları 24 hikâyeden oluşan Canterbury Hikâyeleri adlı eseri, yazarın yaşadığı toplumun bir panoramasını sunmaktadır. Hacıların birbirlerine anlattıkları bu hikâyeler, kadın ve erkek tasvirleri, saraylı aşkı, şövalyelik, şeref ve dine bağlı yaşam gibi birçok konuyu ele almaktadır. Bu hikâyelerin kökenlerinde fabliau, romans, saraylı usulü aşk geleneği ve aziz efsanesi gibi kaynakları bulmak mümkündür. Toplumsal cinsiyetin tasviri, bu hikayelerde oldukça önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu rollerin tasvir edilmesi, kadınların bu hikâyelerde nasıl bastırıldıklarını da ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu çalışma bu noktalardan yola çıkarak, Chaucer’ın Canterbury Hikâyeleri adlı eserinde yer alan “The Franklin’s Tale,” “The Physician’s Tale” ve “The Man of Law’s Tale” hikâyelerinde toplumsal cinsiyetin ve toplumsal cinsiyet rollerinin sorunlu tasvirini, bu hikâyelerde yer alan üç kadın karakterin kapsamlı incelemesi üzerinden tartışacaktır. Böylesi bir tartışma, bu hikâyelerde bahsi geçen kadın karakterlere ne gibi özellikler verildiğini; tarihsel, toplumsal ve edebî bir bağlam içerisinde hikâyelere ve konu ile ilgili ikincil kaynaklara göndermeler üzerinden ortaya koyacaktır.

Keywords

Geoffrey Chaucer, Canterbury Hikâyeleri, “The Franklin’s Tale”, “The Physician’s Tale”, “The Man of Law’s Tale”, toplumsal cinsiyet

References

• Baker, D. C. (1961). A crux in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale: Dorigen’s complaint. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 60, 56-64.
• Blalock M. and Larson, W. (2003). General introduction. In: Reames S. (Ed.), Middle English legends of women saints (pp. 1-22). Kalamazoo, Michigan: Medieval Institute Publications.
• Bloch, R. H. (1989). Chaucer’s maiden’s head: The Physician Tale and the poetics of virginity. Representations, 28, 113-134.
• Bloomfield, M. W. (1972). The Man of Law’s Tale: A tragedy of victimization and a Christian comedy. PMLA, 87(3), 384-390.
• Butler, J. (1988). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519-531. doi:10.2307/3207893.
• Chaucer, G. (1957). The works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin.
• Chao, M. (2007). Female voice in Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. General Education and Transdisciplinary Research, 1(2), 75-92.
• Fichte, J. O. (1983). Incident - history – exemplum - novella: The transformation of history in Chaucer’s Physician’s Tale. Florilegium, 5, 189-207. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/flor/article/view/19342
• Furnish, S. (2007). Thematic structure and symbolic motif in the middle English Breton lays. Traditio, 62, 83-118. doi:10.1017/S0362152900000544.
• Hallissy, M. (1993). Clean maids, true wives, steadfast widows: Chaucer’s women and medieval codes of conduct. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
• Lennox, S. (1991). Some proposals for feminist literary criticism. Women in German Yearbook, 7, 91-97. doi:10.1353/wgy.1991.0002.
• Mann, L. A. (1966). Gentilesse and the Franklin Tale. Studies in Philology, 63 (1), 10-29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4173516
• Martin, J. H. (1972). Love’s fools: Aucassin, Troilus, Calisto and the parody of the courtly lover. London: Spain.
• Middleton, A. (1973). The Physician’s Tale and Love’s Martyrs: Ensamples Mo Than Ten as a Method in the Canterbury Tales. The Chaucer Review, 8(1), 9-32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25093247
• Misra, J. (2018). Categories, structures, and intersectional theory. In J. W. Messerschmidt, et al. (Eds.), Gender reckonings: New social theory and research (pp. 111-130). New York: NYU Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1pwtb3r.12
• Nash, K. (1994). The feminist production of knowledge: Is deconstruction a practice for women? Feminist Review, 47, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1994.22
• Nowlin, S. (2006). Between precedent and possibility: Liminality, historicity, and narrative in Chaucer’s The Franklin’s Tale. Studies in Philology, 103(1), 47-67. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4174838
• Scheps, W. (1974). Chaucer’s Man of Law and the Tale of Constance. PMLA, 89(2), 285-295. doi:10.2307/461451.
• Schofield, W. H. (1901). Chaucer’s Franklin Tale. PMLA, 16(3), 405-449. doi:10.2307/456483.
• Warden, T. L. (2001). Medieval courtly love: The links between courtly love, Christianity, and the roles of women: Tennyson and Morris (Master’s thesis, East Tennessee State University, Tennessee).
• Yuval-Davis, N. (2009). Intersectionality and feminist politics. In M. T. Berger and K. Guidroz (Eds.), The Intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, and gender (pp. 44-60). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5149/9780807895566_berger.6