Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sürdürülebilir Üniversitelerin Yönetişim-Strateji Çalışmaları ve İletişimi İçin Karşılaştırma Bazlı Bir Yaklaşım Önerisi

Year 2021, Issue: 45, 396 - 412, 29.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.929913

Abstract

Sürdürülebilirlik kavramının gittikçe önem kazandığı günümüzde, sürdürülebilirlik çalışmaları üniversitelerde de önem kazanmaya başlamış ve birçok üniversite, sürdürülebilir bir üniversite olma taahhüdünde bulunmak için süreçlerini yeniden organize etmeye başlamıştır. Bu alanda yol gösterici olmak için, üniversiteler için de bu konuda sürdürülebilirlik sıralama sistemleri geliştirilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada sürdürülebilir bir üniversitenin yönetişim, strateji ve iletişim çerçevesinde önceliklendirmesi gereken temel göstergelerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak, THE Impact, UI GreenMetric ve GRI olmak üzere yaygın olarak kullanılan üç küresel sürdürülebilirlik sıralama ve raporlama endeksinin yönetişim ve strateji yönlerine dayalı karşılaştırmalı analiz yapılmıştır. Bu çerçevede; sürdürülebilir bir üniversitenin strateji ve yönetişim çalışmalarının hangi kapsamlarda yapılandırılması gerektiğinin ortaya çıkarılması ve bu kapsamda sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi için gerekli olan araçların incelenmesi yapılmıştır. Yapılan karşılaştırmalı analiz, yönetişim ve strateji alanı altındaki dört ana başlığı kapsamaktadır. Bu başlıklar; ‘Temel Strateji ve Politikalar/Yönetim Yapısı’, ‘Etik’, ‘Sosyal Alanlar’ (Cinsiyet Eşitliği, Eşitlik ve Çeşitlilik, İnsan Hakları) ve son olarak ‘Çevresel Etki Politikaları’ndan oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada ayrıca, ilgili göstergelerin karşılaştırılması ve gelecekteki eylemler ile ilgili daha fazla kavrayışın tartışılması sunulmaktadır.

References

  • Alshuwaikhat, HM., Abubakar, IR., Aina, YA. & Saghir, B. (2017). Networking The Sustainable Campus Awards: Engaging with The Higher Education Institutions in Developing Countries. İçinde Walter Leal Filho, Constantina Skanavis, Arminda do Paco, Judy Rogers, Olga Kuznetsova, Paula Castro (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Switzerland: Springer.
  • GreenMetric (2020). UI Greenmetric | World University Rankings, http://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/. [Erişim Tarihi: 29 Ağustos 2020].
  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2020a). About GRI, https://www.globalreporting.org/Information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx. [Erişim Tarihi: 23 Haziran 2020].
  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2020b). GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database, https://database.globalreporting.org/search/. [Erişim Tarihi: 01 Eylül 2020].
  • Hohnen, P. (2012). The Future of Sustainability Reporting. Chatham House. EEDP Programme Paper: 2012/02,https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/0112pp_hohnen.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 24 Haziran 2020].
  • IFC. (2010). Getting More Value Out of Sustainability Reporting. Connecting IFC’s Sustainability Performance Standards and The GRI Reporting Framework, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/8b163f49-d694-4879-aec0-9dbd10059eb0/WB_IFC_GettingMoreValue.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-8b163f49-d694-4879-aec0-9dbd10059eb0-jkD0-WU. [Erişim Tarihi: 23 Haziran 2020].
  • Lauder, A., Sari, R. F., Suwartha, N., Tjahjono, G. (2015). Critical Review of a Global Campus Sustainability Ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 852–863. Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From Big Government To Big Governance. UK: The Oxford Handbook of Governance.
  • Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., & Hugé, J. (2015). A Review of Commitment and Implementation of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Results from a Worldwide Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1–18.
  • Marginson, S. & Van der Wende, M. (2007). To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in Intarnational Education, 11(3–4):306–329.
  • Nickols, F. (2008). Strategy, Strategic Management, Strategic Planning and Strategic Thinking. Distance Consulting LLC, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242698739_STRATEGY_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT_STRATEGIC_PLANNING_AND_STRATEGIC_THINKING. [Erişim Tarihi: 29 Ağustos 2020].
  • OECD. (2008). Gender and Sustainable Development: Maximising The Economic, Social And Environmental Role of Women, https://www.oecd.org/social/40881538.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 01 Eylül 2020].
  • Ragazzi, M. & Ghidini, F. (2017). Environmental Sustainability of Universities: Critical Analysis of a Green Ranking. Energy Procedia, 119, 111–120.
  • Rioplus. (2006). Strategic Communication for Sustainable Development A Conceptual Overview. Environmental Policy and Promotion of Strategies for Sustainable Development. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (Ed.). Germany. https://www.cbd.int/cepa/toolkit/2008/doc/Strategic%20Communication%20for%20Sustainable%20development.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 24 Ağustos 2020].
  • Suwartha, N. & Sari, R.F. (2013). Evaluating UI GreenMetric As a Tool to Support Green Universities Development: Assessment of the Year 2011 Ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61:46–53.
  • Thakur, M. (2007). The Impact of Ranking Systems on Higher Education and Its Stakeholders. Journal of Institutional Research, 13(1):83–96, https://peopleandplanet.org/university-league. [Erişim Tarihi: 02 Eylül 2020].
  • THE (Times Higher Education). (2020). Impact Ranking, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2020/overall#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/undefined. [Erişim Tarihi: 26 Ekim 2020].
  • UN. (2016). Chief Executives Board for Coordination. CEB/2016/6/Add.1. https://www.unsceb.org/CEBPublicFiles/CEB_2016_6%20_Add.1%20%28inequalities%20framework%29.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 28 Ağustos 2020].
  • UNGC. (2020). Social Sustainability. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/social. [Erişim Tarihi: 12 Ağustos 2020].
  • WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ysa, T., Albareda, A., Colom, J., Ramon, A. Carrion, M. & Segura, L. (2014). Governance of Addictions: European Public Policies. UK: Oxford Press.
  • Zimmerli, W., Richter, K. & Holzinger, M. (2007). Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. NYC: Springer.
Year 2021, Issue: 45, 396 - 412, 29.04.2021
https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.929913

Abstract

References

  • Alshuwaikhat, HM., Abubakar, IR., Aina, YA. & Saghir, B. (2017). Networking The Sustainable Campus Awards: Engaging with The Higher Education Institutions in Developing Countries. İçinde Walter Leal Filho, Constantina Skanavis, Arminda do Paco, Judy Rogers, Olga Kuznetsova, Paula Castro (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education. Switzerland: Springer.
  • GreenMetric (2020). UI Greenmetric | World University Rankings, http://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/. [Erişim Tarihi: 29 Ağustos 2020].
  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2020a). About GRI, https://www.globalreporting.org/Information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx. [Erişim Tarihi: 23 Haziran 2020].
  • GRI (Global Reporting Initiative). (2020b). GRI Sustainability Disclosure Database, https://database.globalreporting.org/search/. [Erişim Tarihi: 01 Eylül 2020].
  • Hohnen, P. (2012). The Future of Sustainability Reporting. Chatham House. EEDP Programme Paper: 2012/02,https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Energy,%20Environment%20and%20Development/0112pp_hohnen.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 24 Haziran 2020].
  • IFC. (2010). Getting More Value Out of Sustainability Reporting. Connecting IFC’s Sustainability Performance Standards and The GRI Reporting Framework, https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/8b163f49-d694-4879-aec0-9dbd10059eb0/WB_IFC_GettingMoreValue.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-8b163f49-d694-4879-aec0-9dbd10059eb0-jkD0-WU. [Erişim Tarihi: 23 Haziran 2020].
  • Lauder, A., Sari, R. F., Suwartha, N., Tjahjono, G. (2015). Critical Review of a Global Campus Sustainability Ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 852–863. Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From Big Government To Big Governance. UK: The Oxford Handbook of Governance.
  • Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., & Hugé, J. (2015). A Review of Commitment and Implementation of Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Results from a Worldwide Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1–18.
  • Marginson, S. & Van der Wende, M. (2007). To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in Intarnational Education, 11(3–4):306–329.
  • Nickols, F. (2008). Strategy, Strategic Management, Strategic Planning and Strategic Thinking. Distance Consulting LLC, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242698739_STRATEGY_STRATEGIC_MANAGEMENT_STRATEGIC_PLANNING_AND_STRATEGIC_THINKING. [Erişim Tarihi: 29 Ağustos 2020].
  • OECD. (2008). Gender and Sustainable Development: Maximising The Economic, Social And Environmental Role of Women, https://www.oecd.org/social/40881538.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 01 Eylül 2020].
  • Ragazzi, M. & Ghidini, F. (2017). Environmental Sustainability of Universities: Critical Analysis of a Green Ranking. Energy Procedia, 119, 111–120.
  • Rioplus. (2006). Strategic Communication for Sustainable Development A Conceptual Overview. Environmental Policy and Promotion of Strategies for Sustainable Development. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH (Ed.). Germany. https://www.cbd.int/cepa/toolkit/2008/doc/Strategic%20Communication%20for%20Sustainable%20development.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 24 Ağustos 2020].
  • Suwartha, N. & Sari, R.F. (2013). Evaluating UI GreenMetric As a Tool to Support Green Universities Development: Assessment of the Year 2011 Ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61:46–53.
  • Thakur, M. (2007). The Impact of Ranking Systems on Higher Education and Its Stakeholders. Journal of Institutional Research, 13(1):83–96, https://peopleandplanet.org/university-league. [Erişim Tarihi: 02 Eylül 2020].
  • THE (Times Higher Education). (2020). Impact Ranking, https://www.timeshighereducation.com/rankings/impact/2020/overall#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/undefined. [Erişim Tarihi: 26 Ekim 2020].
  • UN. (2016). Chief Executives Board for Coordination. CEB/2016/6/Add.1. https://www.unsceb.org/CEBPublicFiles/CEB_2016_6%20_Add.1%20%28inequalities%20framework%29.pdf. [Erişim Tarihi: 28 Ağustos 2020].
  • UNGC. (2020). Social Sustainability. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/social. [Erişim Tarihi: 12 Ağustos 2020].
  • WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ysa, T., Albareda, A., Colom, J., Ramon, A. Carrion, M. & Segura, L. (2014). Governance of Addictions: European Public Policies. UK: Oxford Press.
  • Zimmerli, W., Richter, K. & Holzinger, M. (2007). Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. NYC: Springer.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Esra Bayhantopçu This is me 0000-0001-6680-8414

Pınar Gökçin Özuyar This is me 0000-0002-2505-2216

Publication Date April 29, 2021
Submission Date January 5, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 45

Cite

APA Bayhantopçu, E., & Özuyar, P. G. (2021). Sürdürülebilir Üniversitelerin Yönetişim-Strateji Çalışmaları ve İletişimi İçin Karşılaştırma Bazlı Bir Yaklaşım Önerisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(45), 396-412. https://doi.org/10.52642/susbed.929913

24108 28027 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License