KAMU VE ÖZEL SEKTÖR MATBAA İŞLETMELERİNDE ÇALIŞANLARIN İÇSEL MOTİVASYON DÜZEYLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2006, Issue: 16, 619 - 632, 01.08.2006

Muharrem Tuna Mehmet Sezai Türk

Abstract

Bu çalışma; kamu ve özel sektör işletmelerinde çalışanların içsel motivasyon düzeylerini araştırmak ve karşılaştırmak amacıyla hazırlanmıştır. Araştırmada motivasyon özelliklerinin belirlenmesi için bu alanla ilgili olan normların neler olduğunu literatür taramasıve uzman görüşleri alınarak belirlenmiştir. İşgörenlerin, içsel motivasyon düzeylerine ilişkin verilerin toplanmasında anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Anket formu, çalışanların demografik özellikleri ve içsel motivasyonlarıolmak üzere iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler, SPSS.11 istatistik paket programıile analiz edilmiştir. Veriler tanımlayıcıve çıkarımsal istatistik açısından ele alınmıştır. Bu nedenle, demografik soruların cevaplarıfrekans dağılım tablolarıyardımıyla değerlendirilmiştir. İşletmelerin motivasyon değişkeni açısından karşılaştırılmasında ise, tek yönlü Anova’dan yararlanılmıştır. Yapılan araştırmada, kamu sektöründe faaliyet gösteren matbaa işletmesi işgören motivasyonunun, özel sektörde faaliyet gösteren matbaa işletmesi işgören motivasyonundan daha yüksek olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

Matbaa, motivasyon, içsel motivasyon, örgüt, yönetim.

References

• Adams, S. J. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. New York: Academic Press.
• Alderfer, C. (1972). Existence, relatedness, & growth. New York: Free Press.
• Baldwin, J. N. (1987). Public versus private: Not that different, not that consequential. Public Personnel Management, 16(2), 181-193.
• Baldwin, J. N.,&Farley, Q. A. (2001). Comparing the public and private sectors in the United States:Areviewof the empirical research. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and developmental public administration (2nd ed., pp. 119-130). New York: Marcel Dekker.
• Carr, A. E. & Li-Ping Tang, T. (2005). Sabbaticals and Employee Motivation: Benefits, Concerns, and Implications. Journal of Education for Business, January/February, 160-164.
• Clinton, B. D. & Kohlmeyer, J. (2005). The effects of group quizzes on performance and motivation to learn: Two experiments in cooperative learning. Journal of Accounting Education, 23, 96–116.
• Deci, E., Betely, G., Kahle J., Abrahams, L. & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79-85.
• Delfgaauw, J. & Dur, R. Incentives and Workers’ Motivation in the Public Sector. Working Paper, Erasmus University, Tinbergen Institute, No: 04-060/1 June 1, 2004.
• Erdoğanaras, F. (2004). Basım ve Yayın Sektöründe Yeni Teknolojilere Dayalı Yeniden Yapılanma Süreci: İstanbul Örneği. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:19, No:1, 29-36.
• Eren, E. (2004). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. Kırklareli: Beta Basım.
• Franco, L. M.; Bennett, S. & Kanfer, R. (2002). Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: a conceptual framework. Social Science Medicine, 54, 1255–1266.
• Frank, S. A. & Lewis, G. B. (2004). Government Employees Working Hard or Hardly Working? American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 34 No. 1, March, 36-51.
• Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
• Herselmann, S. (2001). Performance Motivation Among Employees of a Wholesale Companies. South Africa Journal, 24, 1, 1-10.
• Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland: World.
• Hull, C. L. (1951). Essentials of behavior. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
• Humphrey, C. & Russell, J. (2004). Motivation and values of hospital consultants in south-east England who work in the national health service and do private practice. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1241–1250
• Jost, G., Dawson, M. & Shaw, D. (2005). Private Sector Consortia Working for a Public Sector Client– Factors that Build Successful Relationships: Lessons from the UK. European Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, 336–350.
• Jurkiewicz, C. L., Massey, T. K, Jr.,&Brown, R. G. (1998). Motivation in public and private organizations: A comparative study. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21(3), 230-250.
• Koçel, T. (1998). İşletme Yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
• Locke, E.A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 3(1), 152-189.
• Locke, E. A. (1976) Legislating the quality of work life: Locke's reply to Lawler's rebuttal. The Industrial. Organizational Psychologist, (Nov.), 14- 24.
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
• McClelland, D.C. (1961).The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
• Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. & Dubin, R. (1974). Unit Performance, Situational Factors and Employee Attitudes in Spatially Seperated Work Units. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 231.
• Nowlin, W. A. (1982). Factors that motivate public and private sector managers: A comparison. Public Personnel Management Journal, 11(3), 224-227.
• Orpen, C. (1995). The Multifactoral Achivement Scale as a Predictor of Salary Growth and Motivation Among Middle Managers. Social Behavior and Personality, 23 (2), 159-162.
• Öztürk, Z. & Dündar, H. (2003). Örgütsel Motivasyon ve Kamu Çalışanlarını Motive Eden Faktörler. C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı:2, 57-67.
• Parsons, E. & Broadbridge, A. (2006). Job motivation and satisfaction: Unpacking the key factors for charity shop managers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 121–131.
• Porter, L.W. & Lawler, E.E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
• Porter, L.W. (1975). Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Rainey, H., Backoff, R.W.,&Levine, C. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233-244.
• Reiger, R. C. & Stang, J. (1999). Management and Motivation: An Analysis of Productivity in Education and the Workplace. Management and Motivation Education, Vol:121, No:1, 62-64.
• Rutte, C. G. (1998). Influence of motivation and task difficulty on gender discrimination judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 275-280.
• Shang, R.; Chen, Y. & Shen, L. (2005). Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line. Information & Management, 42, 401–413.
• Stenmark, D. (2000). The role of intrinsic motivation when managing creative work. In Proceeding of ICMIT , Singapore, November 12-15.
• Usugami, J. & Park, K. (2006). Similarities and differences in employee motivation viewed by Korean and Japanese executives: empirical study on employee motivation management of Japanese affiliated companies in Korea. International Journal of Human Resource Management, February, 280–294.
• Vallerand, R.J.(1983). The effects of differential amounts of positive verbal feedback on intrinsic motivation of male hockey players. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 100-107.
• Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley Publishing.
• Weinberg, R. & Ragan, J. (1979). Effects of competition, success failure and sex on intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly, 50, 505-510.
• Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity and Management Review, 14(4), 369-383.