BibTex RIS Cite

Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi Farklı Bölüm Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Dersine Olan Öz-Yeterlilik Durumlarının Karşılaştırılması

Year 2009, Issue: 21, 339 - 345, 01.02.2009

Abstract

Betimleyici türdeki çalışma Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi 2008–2009 Eğitim-Öğretim yılıgüz döneminde yapılmıştır. Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesinde Sağlık Yüksekokulu Hemşirelik bölümü ve BESYO Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği bölümlerinin 2, 3 ve 4. sınıflarında öğrenim gören ve anatomi dersi almışolan 264 üniversite öğrencinin tamamıaraştırmanın evrenini oluşturmuştur. Araştırmaya 106 Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği öğrencisi ile 158 hemşirelik öğrencisi olmak üzere toplam 264 öğrenci katılmıştır. Öğrencilerin %58.8’i Hemşirelik bölümünde eğitim görmekte , % 41.2’si ise Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği bölümünde eğitim görmektedir. Hemşirelik bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin anatomi dersine olan öz-yeterlilikleri Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenliği bölümünde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin anatomi dersine olan öz-yeterliliklerinden daha yüksek bulunmuştur.

References

  • Aksayan, S. ve Gözüm, S. (1998). Olumlu Sağlık Davranışlarının Başlatılması ve Sürdürülmesinde Öz etkililik Algısının Önemi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi HYO Dergisi, 2: 35-42.
  • Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S. ve Koray, Ö. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inanç düzeyleri Ve problem çözme becerileri üzerine bir Araştırma (Kastamonu ili örneği) Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:13 No:1, 93-102.
  • Anderson, MA., Dragsted, S., Evans, RH., and Sİrensen, H. (2004). The Relationship Between Changes in Teachers’ Selfefficacy Beliefs and the Science Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education.Volume 15, Number 1 , February.
  • Aşkar, P., Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayarla İlgili Özyeterlik Algısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21:1-8.
  • Bahçeci, D. (2006). Anatomi Dersinde Portfolyo Kullanmanın Öğrencilerin Bilişsel ve Duyuşsal Özellikleri Üzerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency”, American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122-147.
  • Bjorklund, DF. (1995). Children’s Thinking: Developmental Function and İndividual Differences, Brooks/Cole Pub.
  • Chan, D.W. (2003). Multiple intelligences and perceived self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong, Educational Psychology, 23(5), 521-533
  • Dorman, JP. (2001). Associations Between Classroom Environment And Academic Efficacy, Learning Environments Research 4, 243–257.
  • Johnson, J. L.; Ratner, Pamela A.; Bottorff, Joan L.; Hayduk, Leslıe A. (1993). An exploration of Pender’s Health Promotion Model using Lisrel, Nursing Research,42 (3), 132-37.
  • Koray, Ö. (2003). Yaratıcı Düşünceye Dayalı Fen Öğretiminin Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz Yeterlik, Yaratıcılık ve Problem Çözme Düzeylerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Kushner, SN. (1993). Teacher Efficacy And Pre-Service Teachers: A Construct Validation, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association in Clearwater, February 17-22, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA.
  • Lorsbach, AW., Jinks, JL. (1999). Self-Efficacy Theory And Learning Environment Research, Learning Environments Research, 2, 157–167.
  • Palank, CL. (1991). Determinants of health promotive behavior , Nurs Clin North Am,26(4), 815-31.
  • Pender, NJ. (1987). Health Promotion in Nursing Practice, 2nd edition, Appleton&Lange, USA.
  • Ritter, J., Boone, W., Rubba, P. (2001). Development of An Instrument To Assess Prospective Elementary Teacher Self- Efficacy Beliefs About Equitable Science Teaching And Learning (SEBEST), Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 175-198.
  • Santiago, AM., Einerson, MK. (1998). Background Characteristics As Predictors Of Academic Self-Confidence And Academic Self-Efficacy Among Graduate Science And Engineering Students, Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 163-198.
  • Schriver, M., Czerniak, CM. (1999). A Comparison of Middle And Junior High Science Teachers Levels of Efficacy And Knowledge of Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum And Instruction, Journal of ScienceTeacher Education, 10(1), 21-42.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim – Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Sherer, M., Maddux, JE., Mercandante, S., Prentıcedunn, B., Jacobs, B. and Rogers, RW. (1982). “The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation”, Psychol Reports., 51: 663-671.
  • Wenner, G. (2001). Science and mathematics efficacy beliefs held by practicing and prospective teachers: a 5-year perspective, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 181-187.
  • Yaman, S. (2003). Fen Bilgisi Eğitiminde Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmenin Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.

Comparing The Karamanoglu Mehmet University Students’ Self - Ability For Anatomy Lesson In Diffrent Branches

Year 2009, Issue: 21, 339 - 345, 01.02.2009

Abstract

Self-effectiveness-ability which is one of the basic concepts that Bandura thinks it has effect on behavior is one of the components of social-learning concept. Healthy developing programme which has been argued in our country recently was developed by Pender as based on Bandura’s social learning concept. This model defines the elements which develope the health and predicted casual mechanism by explaining Jhonson et al., 1993; Pender, 1987 . Self –effectiveness-ability is a concept as spacial faith for condition and sensation. However one’s Self–effectiveness-ability sensation helps the speacial expectation for condition Sherer et al., 1982 . Individual mat transfer his or her self–effectiveness-ability sensation to another person. For instance; in a searchment Chan, 2003 the diabetic children of mothers who have high self–effectiveness-ability sensation is better when compared with the group which has low self-care and self-ability time. The aim of this searchment to measure the self-ability condition of Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey University‘s students’ selfability condition whose branches are physical education and sport academy and nursing and students’ who took anatomy lesson self-ability condition. When evalauting the datums SPSS 10.0 programme was used. This descriptive searchment was carried out Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey University 2008-2009 Academic year in fall. This searchment includes Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey University health academy nursing department and physical education and sport academy‘s students who are at 2. ,3. and 4. year at university and 264 students who took anatomy lesson. Only this school was included because there are 2 school in university which have anatomy lesson. When collecting the datums age and sex which are socio-demographic datums, when measureing the datums involvement to anatomy lesson, positive or negative behaviours in anatomy lesson, prejudice for anatomy lesson which are interrogated in Equal Periodic Likert Anatomy Attitude criterion was carried out. Bahçeci in postgraduate theses, 35 sentence were defined which effects the students’ self-ability for anatomy lesson and then they were changed into a criterion which is Equal Periodic Likert style 5 level classification criterion. This criterion was evaluated and it has 30 question in the end. This 30 question had factor analyses, questions whose burden is lower than 0,40 were excluded and finallyu 26 question is in our hand Factor 1: Sensation of trust for information saving in anatomy Factor 2: Being aware of implementation ability abaut anatomy Factor 3: Changing the teoric information into life ability The developed criterion’s inner consistency was calculated as Cronbach alfa α =0,75 and it is enough safe to be used in searchment Bahçeci, 2006 . Searchment’s datums were collected by questionnaire which based on student’s self-notice in class, crowded area and under supervision of researcher between 17-21 november. 106 phsycal education and sport academy students, 158 nursing and total 264 students were included into searchment. The avarage age is 22.79 ± 1.87 in searchment. % 62.2 of participant is woman, % 33.8 is man % 58.8 of participants’ branch is nursing, % 23 .0 is at 2. Class, % 18.5 at 3. Class and % 17.3 is at 4. Class, % 41.2 of participant’s branch is phsycal education and sport academy, % 16.7 second class, % 11.7 third class and % 12.8 4th class students. Students’ self –ağabeylity for anatomy lesson has a difference according to their branch [t 251 = 7.32, p

References

  • Aksayan, S. ve Gözüm, S. (1998). Olumlu Sağlık Davranışlarının Başlatılması ve Sürdürülmesinde Öz etkililik Algısının Önemi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi HYO Dergisi, 2: 35-42.
  • Altunçekiç, A., Yaman, S. ve Koray, Ö. (2005). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-yeterlik inanç düzeyleri Ve problem çözme becerileri üzerine bir Araştırma (Kastamonu ili örneği) Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:13 No:1, 93-102.
  • Anderson, MA., Dragsted, S., Evans, RH., and Sİrensen, H. (2004). The Relationship Between Changes in Teachers’ Selfefficacy Beliefs and the Science Teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education.Volume 15, Number 1 , February.
  • Aşkar, P., Umay, A. (2001). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayarla İlgili Özyeterlik Algısı, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21:1-8.
  • Bahçeci, D. (2006). Anatomi Dersinde Portfolyo Kullanmanın Öğrencilerin Bilişsel ve Duyuşsal Özellikleri Üzerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). “Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency”, American Psychologist, 37 (2), 122-147.
  • Bjorklund, DF. (1995). Children’s Thinking: Developmental Function and İndividual Differences, Brooks/Cole Pub.
  • Chan, D.W. (2003). Multiple intelligences and perceived self-efficacy among Chinese secondary school teachers in Hong Kong, Educational Psychology, 23(5), 521-533
  • Dorman, JP. (2001). Associations Between Classroom Environment And Academic Efficacy, Learning Environments Research 4, 243–257.
  • Johnson, J. L.; Ratner, Pamela A.; Bottorff, Joan L.; Hayduk, Leslıe A. (1993). An exploration of Pender’s Health Promotion Model using Lisrel, Nursing Research,42 (3), 132-37.
  • Koray, Ö. (2003). Yaratıcı Düşünceye Dayalı Fen Öğretiminin Öğretmen Adaylarının Öz Yeterlik, Yaratıcılık ve Problem Çözme Düzeylerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Kushner, SN. (1993). Teacher Efficacy And Pre-Service Teachers: A Construct Validation, Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association in Clearwater, February 17-22, Clearwater Beach, FL, USA.
  • Lorsbach, AW., Jinks, JL. (1999). Self-Efficacy Theory And Learning Environment Research, Learning Environments Research, 2, 157–167.
  • Palank, CL. (1991). Determinants of health promotive behavior , Nurs Clin North Am,26(4), 815-31.
  • Pender, NJ. (1987). Health Promotion in Nursing Practice, 2nd edition, Appleton&Lange, USA.
  • Ritter, J., Boone, W., Rubba, P. (2001). Development of An Instrument To Assess Prospective Elementary Teacher Self- Efficacy Beliefs About Equitable Science Teaching And Learning (SEBEST), Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 175-198.
  • Santiago, AM., Einerson, MK. (1998). Background Characteristics As Predictors Of Academic Self-Confidence And Academic Self-Efficacy Among Graduate Science And Engineering Students, Research in Higher Education, 39(2), 163-198.
  • Schriver, M., Czerniak, CM. (1999). A Comparison of Middle And Junior High Science Teachers Levels of Efficacy And Knowledge of Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum And Instruction, Journal of ScienceTeacher Education, 10(1), 21-42.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2005). Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim – Kuramdan Uygulamaya, Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Sherer, M., Maddux, JE., Mercandante, S., Prentıcedunn, B., Jacobs, B. and Rogers, RW. (1982). “The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation”, Psychol Reports., 51: 663-671.
  • Wenner, G. (2001). Science and mathematics efficacy beliefs held by practicing and prospective teachers: a 5-year perspective, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(2), 181-187.
  • Yaman, S. (2003). Fen Bilgisi Eğitiminde Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmenin Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sefa Lök This is me

Özden Taşğın This is me

Neslihan Lök This is me

Mustafa Yıldız This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 21

Cite

APA Lök, S., Taşğın, Ö., Lök, N., Yıldız, M. (2009). Karamanoğlu Mehmet Bey Üniversitesi Farklı Bölüm Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Dersine Olan Öz-Yeterlilik Durumlarının Karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi(21), 339-345.

24108 28027 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License