Sanayi toplumundan bilgi toplumuna geçişsüreci toplumların kültürlerinde, yönetim tarzlarında ve liderlik anlayışlarında önemli değişimler meydana getirmiştir. Artık sadece emir veren değil, aynızamanda yaratıcı, yönlendirici, sürükleyici ve etkileyici bir yönetim anlayışının gerekliliği neredeyse herkes tarafından kabul gören bir paradigma durumuna gelmiştir. Günümüz ekonomisi ve toplumunda, sanayi devrimindeki mühendis özellikli liderlerin yerini insan ilişkilerinde başarılıolan ve örgütteki insan kaynaklarınıen iyi şekilde kullanabilen liderlerin aldığıgörülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacıda bilgi toplumu ile birlikte ortaya çıkan liderlik anlayışının kurumlarda uygulama alanıbulup bulamadıklarınıaraştırmaktır. Sürekli değişim ve yeniliğin yaşandığıbu çağda değişimin öncüsü olarak kabul edilen transformasyonel liderlik yaklaşımıkonusunda kamu çalışanlarının nasıl bir algıya sahip olduklarınıaçıklamak araştırmanın amaçlarıiçerisindedir.
The transition from the industrial society to the information society brought about a dramatic cultural change and transformed management styles and the conception of leadership. The need for a new approach to leadership that is not primarily characterized by giving orders but rather requires being creative, directive, persuasive and impressive became a widely accepted paradigm. Today in both social and economic milieus, managers who are capable of effectively utilizing of human resources in their organizations replaced the managers of the industrial society who were characterized by an engineering-oriented perspective. It is almost impossible to find in the literature on leadership a definition of leadership unanimously agreed on. It is therefore not an easy task to propose a clear and precise definition of leadership. This is because leadership is a universal phenomenon that has various human and social components. Leadership is not a one-dimensional concept. Every definition of leadership explains a different aspect of the concept and sheds light on it from different angles Karkın, 2004: 44 . No term has been used as randomly and diversely as leadership. Leadership in different contexts may be referred to as a personal trait, a positional attribute or a behavioral pattern. The fact that leadership involves both qualitative and evaluative components plays an important role in the difficulty of establishing a precise definition for the term Katz ve Kahn, 1971: 371 . It is in this sense that a solitary model of leadership that depends on one single person no longer responds to what is required by the information society we live in. The model of leadership needed today is one that permeates through all aspects of life on all levels. Old approaches to leadership were thus substituted by new approaches that are more conducive to such an expansion in scope Iraz, 2003: 944 .
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | February 1, 2011 |
Published in Issue | Year 2011 Issue: 25 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License