Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Araştırmaları İnceleme Yeterlikleri

Year 2011, Issue: 26, 343 - 353, 01.08.2011

Mehmet Taşdemir Adem Taşdemir

Abstract

Öğretmen yetiştirmede, öğretmen yeterliklerinin önemli bir boyutunun bilimsel araştırma yeterlikleri olmasıgerektiği hemen herkesçe kabul edilen bir gerçektir. Bu araştırma ile Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel araştırmalarıinceleme yeterlik düzeylerinin tespiti amaçlamıştır. Araştırma Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Türkçe öğretmeni adayı48 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırma betimsel bir araştırma olup, çalışma grubu amaçlıörnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Araştırma verileri katılımcıların yurtiçi hakemli dergilerde yayınlanmışbilimsel bir makalenin incelemelerine dayalıolarak elde edilmiştir. Katılımcıların ayrıntılıincelemesine sunulan araştırma makaleleri, geliştirilen bir ölçek doğrultusunda araştırmacılarca incelenerek araştırma verileri elde edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel araştırma makalelerinin taşımasıgereken özellikleri ne düzeyde tespit edebildiklerine ilişkin olarak; bilimsel bir makalenin problem durumu, yöntem, bulgular ve sonuç/önerilere ilişkin boyutlarındaki yeterlikleri, araştırmanın yazım kurallarına uygunluğu gibi biçimselliği ile ilgili boyutlarındaki yeterliklerine oranla daha düşük oranda olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

Bilimsel araştırma, bilimsel araştırma yeterliği, öğretmen adayı

Scientific Research Review Competences of Prospective Teachers

Abstract

Research, basically, in a search, learning, making the unknown known, to keep the darkness of light, a brief process of enlightenment. Shortly it is a clarification process. Research is vital for person and society Karasar, 2007a . Research culture can be seen as one of the basic features of modern societies includes cognitive, effective and psycho-motor abilities or qualities. And it is accepted that people will achieve this culture by means of education. Research requires skill and experience which requires research independently and criticizing other’s research Balcı, 2009: quoted from Simon and Bursteinn in 1985 . With this denotation it composes a dimension in professional development of students in faculties of education in terms of distinguishing scientific researches, investigating them according to research methods, criticizing and making research independently. In this research, following questions were inquired: • What were the students’ abilities in examining the scientific research? • What were the concepts under each category? The research benefited from the general screening models, single scan model. General scans are, in a universe, consisting of so many elements, the models of scanning on the whole universe or else one group or a sample of it which is used for getting a general idea. In this approach, the changes such as matter, individual, group, subject etc. are tried to be identified Karasar, 2007a . According to Kaptan 1998 , the research which tries to identify some events, objects, entities, associations, groups and various fields are descriptive studies. Descriptive studies aim at explaining the interaction between the situations, by taking care of existing events and the previous events and their relations, too. So, in the study, examining the results achieved with performance evaluation, which aims to show students’ examining skills, represents a real environment. This study was limited with Scientific Research Strategy Lesson. The study group, 2009-2010 academic year, Ahi Ervan University, Faculty of Education, Teacher Training in Turkish 2 grade students, 48 students are determined by random sampling. In order to clarify abilities of candidate teachers about examining scientific researches, their study papers were examined during the process and tried to be determined with the Scale of Decreeing Scientific Research Ability BAYDÖ . With this scale, it was aimed to grade and evaluate performance products authentically. Thanks to this, both it was reduced the researchers’ faults in grading products about the situation and it became a chance to see details of difference between the individuals. In the developing process of BAYDÖ; first of all, the draft form related with ‘scope validity’ was applied to experts’ view. The draft composed by researcher, representing three people expert group. Their views were taken about scope validity of items and some dimensions such as; problems, sub-problems, dependent and independent changes, relation of matters in subject, matters’ root, expressing, ordering etc. Büyüköztürk at all, 2008; Wiersma and Jurs, 2005 . In this context, experts were asked to evaluate the selections as ‘valid’, ‘invalid’, and ‘need to develop’ in each dimension. Also their written views were asked how the whole form and its sub-dimensions ccould be. And by the help of experts’ feedbacks, by determining Kendall’s Tau Correlation Coefficient, experts’ consistence and reliability of matters about the draft form determined. The result of each matters’ coefficient; M1 r=.53 , M2 r=.72 , M3 r=.48 , M4 r=.58 , M5 r=.44 , M6 r=.66 , M7 r=.41 , M8 r=.65 ve M9 r=.46 were found. The results showed that BAYDÖ had the quality of being used in research. As the last aspect, BAYDÖ was configured into 12 categories: Abstract, introduction, problem, writing a research model, explaining the universe and sample, data and explaining how to gather it, explaining how to evaluate data, diagnosis, discussion, result, bibliography, orthography/presentation. In data analysis research, activity reports and written materials, used for product evaluation, were investigated conceptually. Data, derived from written texts, were transferred to computers as existing 1 and non-existing 0 according to 12 dimensions in BAYDÖ. In analyzing these data; first of all, SPSS 15.0 Statistical Package for Social Sciences packet programmed, frequency and percent values were used to determine the students’ ability of examining the scientific researches. Also, in students’ examining the scientific research and determining the relation gender changes, independent t test technique were used. As a second, it was tried to make a relation between concepts-themes-categories according to students’ use of scientific research steps in each dimension. In this stage, relation analysis, a content analysis was used. In case studies, generally defining a situation, searching theme, gathering data about themes and comparing themes are carried on by researcher Bloor and Wood, 2006 . In the research, texts composing data base were analyzed with Osgood 1959 ’s method which is a content-analysis method and examining the items severally or in single parts. Relation analysis, in a whole text, expression, sample etc. aims not to analyze how many times a thing is seen, but aims to analyze what a thing is seen another thing together, various message elements are together in which relations quoted from Bilgin, 2006 . Case studies especially for experimental and scanning studies, consider so complicated context. In spite of having a valid research strategy with the truths but in case studies, quantity techniques, including other research method, can be used Bloor and Wood, 2006 . In this study, the frequencies of appearing codes, achieved by researchers were computed together with relational matrix. In order to support researchers’ evaluation and reflect students’ point of view, sample quotations were derived from documentary texts. According to research diagnosis, students’

Keywords

Research methods, research self proficiency, prospective teachers The type of study: Research

References

• Balcı, A. (2009). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik Ve İlkeler (4.Baskı). Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
• Bilgin, N. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi / teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar. İstanbul: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods. London: Sage Publications.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1999). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin araştırma yeterlikleri. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi (18), 257–69.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç, Ç. E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (2.Basım). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Ekiz, D. (2003). Eğitimde araştırma yöntem ve metotlarına giriş: nitel, nicel ve eleştirel kuram metodolojileri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Geray, H. (2004). Toplumsal araştırmalarda nicel ve nitel yöntemlere giriş.Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Gregson, R. (2004). Teacher-research: the benefits and the pitfalls.UWS AARE http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/gre04828. pdf :edinme: 11,5. 2011
• Karasar, N. (1974). Araştırma eğitimi. A.Ü.Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 7, 1–4: 263–274.
• Karasar, N. (2007a). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17.baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Karasar, N. (2007b). Araştırmalarda rapor hazırlama (14.baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Kaptan, S. (1998). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri (11.Baskı). Ankara: Tek Işık Web Ofset.
• Köklü, N, Büyüköztürk, Ş. ve Çokluk, Ö. (1999, Yaz). İlköğretim müfettişlerinin araştırma yeterlikleri ve araştırma eğitimine ilişkin görüşleri. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi (1), 325–39.
• İpek, A.C., Tekbıyık, A. ve Ursavaş, Ö.F., (2010). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin araştırma öz-yeterlik inançları ve bilgisayar tutumları. Gaziantep üniversitesi sosyal bilimler dergisi.9(1):127–145
• Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research–quantitative & qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
• Saracaloğlu, A.S., (2008). Lisansüstü öğrencilerin akademik güdülenme düzeyleri, araştırma kaygıları ve tutumları ile araştırma yeterlikleri arasındaki ilişki.Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Aralık . Cilt:V, Sayı:II, 179–208
• Ünal, S. Ada, S. (2007) Eğitim bilimine giriş. Nobel Yay. Ankara.
• Üstdal, M., Vullaume, R., Gülbahar, K. ve Gülbahar, Y. (2004). Bilimsel araştırma kılavuzu. İstanbul: Pelikan Yay.
• Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2005). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri.(6.basım) Ankara: Seçkin Yay..