GİZLİLİK VE MAHREMİYETİN DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: TÜRK VE KIRGIZ ÖĞRENCİLERİN SOSYAL MEDYA DAVRANIŞLAR

Year 2018, Issue: 43, 561 - 580, 23.07.2018

Selahattin Çavuş Erdoğan Akman Bünyamin Ayhan

https://doi.org/10.21563/sutad.510726

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, dijitalleşen toplumda sosyal ağlarla birlikte kişinin özelinin öteki tarafından öğrenilmesi başta olmak üzere, sosyal ağ kullanıcılarının bireysel gizlilik ve mahremiyet durumunu nasıl yönettikleri ve öteki üzerinde gizlilik ve mahremiyet olgusuna nasıl baktıkları ortaya konmaya çalışılmaktadır. Çalışmada, nicel yaklaşımdan hareketle veri toplama aracı olarak anket kullanılmaktadır. Anket soruları, bireylerin sosyal ağ kullanım davranışları ve tutumları, bilgi kategorisi ve gizlilikle birlikte mahremiyet durum ölçeğinden oluşmaktadır. Kırgızistan ve Türkiye’de katılımcı üniversite öğrencilerinden elde edilen veriler, istatistiki olarak analiz edilmiştir. Buna göre öğrencilerin internet ortamındaki en büyük endişe kaynağı virüsler, kimlik hırsızlığı ve bilgisayar korsanlarıdır. Kız öğrencilerin sosyal medyadaki endişe ve kaygı düzeyi erkek öğrencilerden daha yüksektir. Türk öğrencilerin sosyal medya platformlarında kişisel bilgilere saygı, yasal gizlilik ve internet sitelerinin güvenliğine Kırgız öğrencilerden daha fazla önem verdiği görülmektedir. Mahremiyet davranışı açısından Türk öğrencilerin Kırgız öğrencilere göre daha açık olduğu bulgulanmıştır. Diğer taraftan Kırgız öğrenciler sosyal medyada gerçek kimliğini daha fazla saklama eğilimi göstermişlerdir.

Keywords

Gizlilik, mahremiyet, sosyal medya, üniversite öğrencileri.

TRANSFORMATION OF SECRECY AND PRIVACY: SOCIAL MEDIA BEHAVIOR OF TURKISH AND KYRGYZ STUDENTS

Abstract

In this study, an effort will be made to show how social network users manage the issue of personal secrecy and privacy, how they view the matter of others’ personal secrecy and privacy, and especially the issue of one’s privacy being learned by someone else with the help of social networks in the digitalizing society. In the study, a survey was used as the data collection tool based on the quantitative approach. Survey questions consisted of the measures of individuals’ social networking behaviors and attitudes, the demographics category, and the level of privacy and secrecy scale. The data obtained from participating university students in Kyrgyzstan and Turkey were analyzed statistically. Accordingly, the biggest sources of anxiety for students on the Internet were viruses, identity theft and hackers. Females’ level of anxiety and concern in social media was higher than that of male students. Turkish students were observed to pay more respect for personal information, legal privacy and security of Internet sites on social media platforms than Kyrgyz students. In terms of privacy behavior, Turkish students were found to be more open than Kyrgyz students. On the other hand, Kyrgyz students tended to hide their true identity more in social media.

Keywords

Secrecy, privacy, social media, university students

References

• ACQUISTI, A., BRANDIMARTE, L., & LOEWENSTEIN, G. (2015), Privacy and Human Behavior in the Age of information. Science, 347(6221), pp. 509-515.
• BARUH L., Cemalcilar Z. (2014), It is more than personal: Development and validation of a multidimensional privacy orientation scale, Personality and Individual Differences, 70, pp. 165–170.
• BELLOTTI, V. (1997), Design for Privacy in Multimedia Computing and Communications Environments, Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape, edited by Philip E. Agre and Marc Rotenberg, 1997 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States of America, pp. 63-98.
• BOND, A. R. and Koch N. R. (2010). "Interethnic Tensions in Kyrgyzstan: A Political Geographic Perspective" Eurasian Geography and Economics 51(4): pp. 531-562.
• BUCHANAN, T., PAINE C., JOINSON A. N., REIPS U. D. (2007), Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the Internet, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2): pp. 157–165.
• CASTELLS, M. (2008), Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi (2.b.). (E. Kılıç, Trans.) İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• DAVIDSON, J., MARTELLOZZO, E. B., (2013). Exploring Young People's Use of Social Networking Sites And Digital Media In The Internet Safety Context, Information, Communication& Society, 16:9, 1456-1476.
• DAWES, S., (2011), Privacy and the public/private dichotomy, Thesis Eleven, 107(1), pp. 115–124.
• DEBATIN, B., LOVEJOY, J. P., HORN A. K., HUGHES, B. N., 2009, Facebook and Online Privacy: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Unintended Consequences, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 83–108.
• DEMIRAĞ, A., ÖNGÜN, E., (2014), The Gray Area of Protectedness, a Case Study on Facebook Users’ Awareness of Their Privacy and Secrecy, Intenrational New Media New Approaches Conference, Social Media and New Policies, Ed. Tevhit Ayengin, Çomü Matbaası, Çanakkale, s.103-116.
• ELLISON N. B., STEINFIELD C., LAMPE C., (2007), The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capitol and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Computer- Mediated Commun; 12, pp. 1143-68.
• EMILY, C., AMY, M., SERGE, D., (2012), Hey Mom, What’s on Your Facebook? Comparing Facebook Disclosure and Privacy in Adolescents and Adults, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), pp. 48-54.
• FENG, Y., XIE, W., (2014), Teens’ Concern for Privacy When Using Social Networking Sites: An Analysis of Socialization Agents and Relationships With Privacy-Protecting Behaviors, Computers in Human Behavior, 33, pp. 153–162.
• GASSET, O, y., (2014), İnsan ve “Herkes” (5.b.). (N. G. Işık, Trans.), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• HANKS R. R. (2011), Crisis in Kyrgyzstan: Conundrums of Ethnic Conflict, National İdentity and State Cohesion, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 13:2, 177-187.
• ISMAİLOVA Rita & MUHAMETJANOVA Gulshat (2016), Cyber Crime Risk Awareness in Kyrgyz Republic, Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 25(1-3), pp. 32-38.
• KHAN, G. F., SWAR, B., LEE, S. K., (2014), Social Media Risks and Benefits: A Public Sector Perspective, Social Science Computer Rewiev, 32(5), 606-627.
• KULİKOVA Svetlana V., PERLMUTTER David D. Blogging Down The Dictator? The Kyrgyz Revolution and Samizdat Websites, The International Communication Gazette, 69(1): 29–50.
• KUYUCU, M., (2015), Sosyal Medyada Mahremiyet: Türkiye’de Twitter Kullanıcılarının Mahremiyet Anlayışı, (iç). Sosyal Medya Araştırmları II, Sosyalleşen Olgular, Ali Büyükaslan, Ali Murat Kırık (Ed), Çizgi Yayınları, Konya, s. 21-53.
• MCMANN K. M. (2006), Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan, Cambridge University Press.
• MARWICK, A. E., & BOYD, D. (2014), Networked Privacy: How Teenagers Negotiate Context in Social Media. New Media & Society, 16(7), pp. 1051–1067.
• NGUYEN, J. (2011), Internet Privacy Class Actions: How to Manage Risks from Increasing Attacks against Online and Social Media. The Computer & Internet Lawyer 28(9), pp. 8-11.
• O’BRIEN, D., TORRES, A., M. (2012), Social Networking and Online Privacy: Facebook Users’ Perceptions, Irish Journal of Management, 31(2), pp. 63-97.
• OZ, M. (2014), Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ve Mahremiyet Algısı: Facebook kullanıcılarının mahremiyet endişeleri ve farkındalıkları. Journal of Yasar University, 9(35), s. 6099-6260.
• ÖZKAYA, B. (2013), Yeni Medya’da Demokrasi içinde Ağ Toplumunun Omurgası Olarak İnternetin Demokrasi ve Kamusal Alan Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. (A. Algül, N. Üçer ed.), Konya: Literatürk Yayınları, pp, 135-164.
• QUINN, K. (2016), Why We Share: A Uses and Gratifications Approach to Privacy Regulation in Social Media Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), pp. 61-86.
• RAHTE, E. Ç. (2009), Kamusallık Mahremiyet Medya: "Kadın Tartışma Programları" Üzerine Etnografik Bİr İnceleme (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• SCOGLIO, S. (1998), Transforming Privacy A Transpersonal Philosophy Of Rights, Praeger Publishers, USA.
• SRİNİVASAN R 2009. Internet Authorship: Social and Political Implications Within Kyrgyzstan, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, pp. 559–580.
• STIEGER, S., BURGER, C., BOHN, M., VORACEK, M. (2013), Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide? Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality Between Facebook Users and Quitters. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(9), pp. 629–634.
• TUFEKCI, Z., (2008), Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites, Bulletin of Science Technology Society; 28(1), pp. 20-36.
• WACHTEL A. B. (2013), Kyrgyzstan between Democratization and Ethnic İntolerance, Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 41:6, 971-986.
• VENKAT A., PICHANDY C., BARCLAY F. P., JAYASEELAN R. (2014), Facebook Privacy Management: An Empirical Study of Awareness, Perception and Fears, Global Media Journal-Indian Edition, 5(1), pp. 1-21.
• VISTILÄ, M., RUOKONEN, F. (2012), Social networking sites and privacy as contextual integrity, Margherita Carucci (ed.) Revealing Privacy Debating the Understandings of Privacy, Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, pp, 119-132.
• WESTIN, A., F. (2003), Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy, Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), pp. 431-453.
• YILDIZ, A. K. (2012). Sosyal Paylaşım Sitelerinin Dijital Yerlilerin Bilgi Edinme ve Mahremiyet Anlayışına Etkisi. Bilgi Dünyası, 13(2), 529-542.
• YÜKSEL, M., (2003), Mahremiyet Hakkı ve Sosyo-Tarihsel Gelişimi, Anakara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt 58, Sayı 1, s. -181- 213.
• ZENGIN, M., ZENGIN, G., & ALTUNBAŞ, H. (2015), Sosyal Medya ve Değişen Mahremiyet "Facebook Mahremiyeti". Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 3(2), 112-136. INTERNET http://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/