Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces

Volume: 9 Number: 1 February 1, 2016
  • Nüvit Coşkun
  • İlke Karayel
  • Feray Alkan
EN

Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces

Abstract

Bovine enteroviruses are thought to be mild pathogenic or non pathogenic viral gastroenteretis agents. However there are some cases where they are identified from cattle having different symptoms. They can also be used as markers of environmental contamination. Enterovirus family has fast replication capacity and can be used as potential vectors. For this purpose isolation and molecular studies concerning Enteroviruses are currently increasing. In this study 10 cattle feces samples were used for evaluation of 4 different extraction methods for investigation of bovine enteroviruses. These methods comprise of TRIzol LS (Life Technologies), QIAamp Viral RNA mini kit (Qiagen), NucleoSpin RNA (Macherey-Nagel) and phenol-chloroform extraction. All procedures performed in BSL-2 cabinet and RNA yield of extracts were analysed in Bio-spec (Shimadzu) spectrophotometer. This RNA templates were then tested by Verso 1 step RT PCR (Thermo Scientific) kit with spesific for Enterovirus 5’UTR primers. And observed for band formation. While QIAmp Viral RNA kit had the shortest protocol, it did not have as much sensitivity as TRIzol LS and TRIzol was determined as the most sensitive method to make extraction of bovine enteroviruses from feces.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Nüvit Coşkun This is me

İlke Karayel This is me

Feray Alkan This is me

Publication Date

February 1, 2016

Submission Date

February 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 9 Number: 1

APA
Coşkun, N., Karayel, İ., & Alkan, F. (2016). Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 54-57. https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK
AMA
1.Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;9(1):54-57. https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK
Chicago
Coşkun, Nüvit, İlke Karayel, and Feray Alkan. 2016. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9 (1): 54-57. https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK.
EndNote
Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F (February 1, 2016) Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9 1 54–57.
IEEE
[1]N. Coşkun, İ. Karayel, and F. Alkan, “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”, Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–57, Feb. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK
ISNAD
Coşkun, Nüvit - Karayel, İlke - Alkan, Feray. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9/1 (February 1, 2016): 54-57. https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK.
JAMA
1.Coşkun N, Karayel İ, Alkan F. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;9:54–57.
MLA
Coşkun, Nüvit, et al. “Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces”. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, Feb. 2016, pp. 54-57, https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK.
Vancouver
1.Nüvit Coşkun, İlke Karayel, Feray Alkan. Comparison of Efficiency of Different Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Bovine Enteroviruses in Feces. Reserach Journal of Agricultural Sciences [Internet]. 2016 Feb. 1;9(1):54-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA29RH37EK