Abstract
References
- Abou-El-Hajj, R. (1991). Formation of the modern state: The Ottoman empire sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. Albany: State University of New York.
- Ágoston, G. (2009). Guns for the sultan: Military power and the weapons industry in the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- ___________. (1994). “Ottoman Artillery and European Military Technology in the Fifteenth to Seventeenth Centuries,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae S. 47(1-2), 15-48.
- Darling, L. T. (1996). Revenue-raising and legitimacy: Tax collection and finance administration in the Ottoman empire, 1560-1660. Leiden: Brill.
- Fleischer, C. H. (1986). Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire. The historian Mustafa Ali, 1541–1600. Princeton: Princeton University.
- Howard, D. (1988). Ottoman historiography and the literature of 'decline' of the sixteenth and seventeenth century, Journal of Asian History, (22), 52–77.
- Kafadar, C. (1993). The myth of the golden age: Ottoman historical consciousness in the post--süleymanic era, in Süleyman the Second and His Time. Halil İnalcık and Cemal Kafadar (ed.), İstanbul: The ISIS.
- ___________. (1997–8). The question of ottoman decline.” Harvard Middle Eastern and Islamic Review, (4), 30–75.
- Murphey, R. (1999). Ottoman warfare 1500-1700. London: Routledge.
- Şahin K. (2014). “İmparatorluk, bürokrasi bilinci ve tarihçinin zanaatı,” Osmanlı sarayında tarihyazımı içinde. H. Erdem Çıpa ve Emine Fetvacı (der.), İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt.
- Tezcan, B. (2010). The second Ottoman Empire political and social transformation in the early modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Abstract
Osmanlı tarihi ve tarih yazımı üzerine yapılan son araştırmalar arasında, genel olarak İmparatorluğun “altın çağı” olarak idealize edilen ve bu yükseliş döneminin hemen ardından gelen “gerileme, çöküş” teorilerine ilişkin yenilikçi bakış açıları dikkat çekmektedir. Erken Modern Çağ Osmanlı Tarihi araştırmalarında hali hazırda kabul görmüş söz konusu yükseliş-çöküş paradigmalarına dair farklı değerlendirmeler sunan Cornell Fleischer (1986), Douglas Howard (1988), Rifa'at Ali Abou-El-Haj (1991), Cemal Kafadar (1993, 1997–8), Gábor Ágoston (1994, 2005), Linda Darling (1996), Rhoads Murphey (1999), Baki Tezcan (2012), gibi araştırmacıların izinde Kaya Şahin de hazır kalıpların aksine Osmanlı geçmişini yeniden inşa etmek için alternatif perspektifler sunmaktadır.
References
- Abou-El-Hajj, R. (1991). Formation of the modern state: The Ottoman empire sixteenth to eighteenth centuries. Albany: State University of New York.
- Ágoston, G. (2009). Guns for the sultan: Military power and the weapons industry in the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
- ___________. (1994). “Ottoman Artillery and European Military Technology in the Fifteenth to Seventeenth Centuries,” Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae S. 47(1-2), 15-48.
- Darling, L. T. (1996). Revenue-raising and legitimacy: Tax collection and finance administration in the Ottoman empire, 1560-1660. Leiden: Brill.
- Fleischer, C. H. (1986). Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire. The historian Mustafa Ali, 1541–1600. Princeton: Princeton University.
- Howard, D. (1988). Ottoman historiography and the literature of 'decline' of the sixteenth and seventeenth century, Journal of Asian History, (22), 52–77.
- Kafadar, C. (1993). The myth of the golden age: Ottoman historical consciousness in the post--süleymanic era, in Süleyman the Second and His Time. Halil İnalcık and Cemal Kafadar (ed.), İstanbul: The ISIS.
- ___________. (1997–8). The question of ottoman decline.” Harvard Middle Eastern and Islamic Review, (4), 30–75.
- Murphey, R. (1999). Ottoman warfare 1500-1700. London: Routledge.
- Şahin K. (2014). “İmparatorluk, bürokrasi bilinci ve tarihçinin zanaatı,” Osmanlı sarayında tarihyazımı içinde. H. Erdem Çıpa ve Emine Fetvacı (der.), İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt.
- Tezcan, B. (2010). The second Ottoman Empire political and social transformation in the early modern world. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Kitap Kritiği |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 26, 2019 |
| Acceptance Date | June 26, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 1 Issue: 1 |
Ethical Committee Approval
With the decision of ULAKBİM on February 25th, 2020, there is a condition that "All the disciplines of science (including social sciences), there should be an Ethical Committee Approval for research involving human and animal (clinical and experimental) separately and this approval must be mentioned in the article and it should be documented". The research conducted by quantitative or qualitative approaches which require data collection such as questionnaire, interview, observation, focus group study, the experiment is regarded under the aforementioned content.