Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy
Principles and Responsibilities for Authors in the Use of AI

AI tools may under no circumstances be listed as the author or co-author of a manuscript.

The submitting author(s) bear full responsibility for the originality, accuracy, and content of the work.

The use of AI tools does not remove or reduce the scientific and ethical responsibilities of the author(s).

Completing the “AI Declaration Form” is mandatory during manuscript submission. If AI has been used at any stage of research, writing, or preparation, it must be explicitly indicated in this form, including the name, version, purpose, and manner of use. The author(s) are personally accountable for the accuracy of the information provided in the declaration form.

Principles for Editors

Unpublished manuscripts, images, or related materials may not be uploaded to AI platforms under any circumstances. Protecting confidentiality and intellectual property rights is essential.

AI tools may only be used in limited editorial processes (e.g., initial screening, reviewer selection) with the explicit approval of the journal management. In such cases, authors must be informed.

If suspected AI use is identified, editors may request clarification from the author(s) or escalate the matter to the journal management.

Editors must carefully review the AI Declaration Form submitted by authors and ensure compliance with the journal’s policies.

Editors are expected to remain informed about developments in AI technology and updated policies.

Principles for Reviewers

Reviewers should notify editors if they suspect undisclosed AI use in manuscripts under review. Such evaluations must be based on objective criteria.

Unpublished manuscripts may never be uploaded to AI platforms. Confidentiality and ethical responsibility must be strictly observed.

Review reports must rely solely on the reviewer’s expertise and judgment; feedback should be constructive, impartial, and consistent with the journal’s guidelines.

Permitted Areas of Use

Conceptual diagrams and explanatory visuals: To illustrate theoretical frameworks or processes.

Data visualization: To enhance the presentation of research data through charts, tables, and diagrams.

Representative or symbolic visuals: To simplify complex ideas with explanatory elements, provided they do not misrepresent the content.

Prohibited Areas of Use

Drafting core sections of the manuscript (abstract, introduction, literature review, findings, discussion) directly through AI tools.

Using AI for producing, reporting, or interpreting research results.

Generating fabricated, unverifiable, or non-existent references/citations.

Delegating the development of original arguments, theoretical contributions, or the central thesis of the paper to AI.

Violations and Sanctions

Failure to declare AI use or providing false declarations may result in immediate rejection during the review process.

If violations are identified after publication, corrective actions such as issuing a correction or retracting the article may be taken.

Repeated or severe violations may lead to the rejection of the author(s)’ future submissions.