Yazılım Mimarisinin Kalite Gereksinimleri:Yazılım Güvenilirliği

Öz

Yazılım güvenilirliği pek çok açıdan yazılım geliştirmede önemli hale gelmektedir. Bu çalışma yazılımcıları yazılım güvenilirliği açısından temel konularda bilgilendirmeyi ve uygulama cesareti kazandırmayı hedeflemektedir. AbstractQuality Requirements for Software Architecture: Software ReliabilityQuality Requirements for Software Architecture: Software Reliability. The aim of this paper is to give the reader a better understanding of the importance of software reliability. Furthermore it focuses on the basics of software reliability, prediction and modeling reliability, collection of data and also the relationship between the software quality and software reliability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yazılım Güvenilirliği, Yazılım Kalitesi

Quality Requirements for Software Architecture: Software Reliability

Öz

Quality Requirements for Software Architecture: Software Reliability. The aim of this paper is to give the reader a better understanding of the importance of software reliability. Furthermore it focuses on the basics of software reliability, prediction and modeling reliability, collection of data and also the relationship between the software quality and software reliability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Software Reliability, Software Quality

Kaynakça

1. IEEE Std. 610.12-1990, Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, New York, IEEE Standards Board.
2. Vouk, M.A., 2000. Software Reliability Engineering, 2000 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Sym.
3. Musa, J.D., 1987. Software Reliabilty Engineering, McGraw-Hill. [4] Ebert, C., Dumke, R., Bundschuh, M., Schmietendorf, A., 2005. Best Practices in Software Measurement, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Summerville, N., Basic Reliability, An introduction to Reliability Engineering, Author House, 2004.
5. IEEE Std 982.1-1988, Standard Dictionary of Measures to Produce Reliable Software, New York, IEEE Standards Board, 1988.
6. Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L., 1997. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2. ed., Boston: PWS Publishing.
7. Pham, H., Zhang, X., 1999. A software cost model with warranty and risk cost, IEEE Transactions on Computers 48 (1), 71-75.
8. Musa, J.D., Iannino, A., Okumoto, K., 1987. Software Reliability, Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

9. Dalal, S.R., 2003. Software Reliability Models: A Selective Survey and New Directions, Handbook of reliability engineering, Hoang Pham (ed.), Springer- Verlag.
10. Pham, H., 2006. System Software Reliability, Springer-Verlag.
11. Wallace, D., Coleman, C., 2001. Hardware and Software Reliability (323-08), NASA Software Assurance Technology Center.
12. Stutzke, M.A., Smidts, C.S., 2001. A stochastic model of fault introduction & removal during software development, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 50 (2), 184-193.
13. Lyu, M.R., 2007. Software Reliability Engineering: A Roadmap, Future of Software Engineering.
14. IEEE Std. 1044-1993, IEEE Standard Classification for Software Anomalies, New York, IEEE Standards Board.
15. The Software Engineering Program, 2005. Software Measurement Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA-GB- 001-94.
16. Hutcheson, NASA National M.L.,
17. Software Testing
18. Fundamentals, Wiley.
19. Ahern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R., 2004. CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, 2. ed. Addison Wesley.
20. Jung, H., Kim, S., Chung, C., 2004. Measuring Software Product Quality: A Survey of ISO/IEC 9126, IEEE Software, 88-92, September/October 2004.
21. IEEE Std. 1061-1988, Standard for a Software Quality Metrics Methodology. Piscataway, NJ,: IEEE Standards Dept.