Abstract
In this paper, a software tool for enabling fuzzy query
from a classical database is introduced. By using this
tool, some attributes of a database table can be
fuzzified and supplementary database, which includes
fuzzy values, is formed. Developed software tool is
applied in a sample database is including some fields
about the bursary(grant) informations. It is
concluded that, the fuzzy query method is more
flexible and results of such query are more
predictive.
Abstract
Bu çalışmada, klasik veri tabanlarında bulanık sorgulama işlemini gerçekleştiren bir “esnek sorgulama aracı” geliştirilmiştir. Esnek sorgulama işlemi, veri tabanındaki kayıtlı tablolar üzerindeki nitelik değerlerinin bulanıklaştırılması işlemi ile gerçekleştirilir. Geliştirilen sorgulama aracı, burs işlemlerinin yapılabilmesi için kayıtların tutulduğu örnek bir “Burs” veri tabanı üzerinde uygulanmıştır Bu işlem sonucunda, bulanık sorgu yönteminin daha esnek bir yaklaşım sunduğu ve elde edilen sonuçların daha tahmin edilebilir olduğu görülmüştür.
Details
| Other ID | JA37GD86ER |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2005 Volume: 1 Issue: 1 - Volume: 1 Issue: 1 |
Cite
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.