Intelligent Semantic Web Service Finder (ISWSF) is a
mechanism that discovers Semantic Web Services
satisfying client requirements. The increase in web
services and lack of semantic base in search
mechanisms of UDDI make it difficult for clients to
find required web services. We developed a system
which uses a Semantic Search Agent (SSA) to discover
required web services from web and selects them
according to the client requirements then presents
them as a result page. The system uses Ontology Web
Language for services (OWL-S), which allows
semantic description of web services and hence, the
Semantic Search Agent is able to understand
predefined concepts of Semantic Web Services, extract
necessary information and decide on the requirement
of a service for a client. The system combines
complimentary aspects of two research topics (Smart
Web Query Engine and Matchmaking Algorithm of
OWL-S/UDDI Matchmaker) to facilitate the provision
of web services to a client.
Bu makale, ağ kullanıcılarının isteğine bağlı olarak,‘Semantic Web Services’ yani diğer bir adıyla Anlamsal Ağ Servislerinin (AAS) keşfedilmesini sağlayan, akıllı bir mekanizmadan bahsetmektedir. Ağ servislerinin sayıca artışı ve anlamsal tabanda bir arama yapılamaması yüzünden kullanıcının isteğine uygun ağ servislerinin, UDDI deposundan elde edilmesi oldukça zordur. Önerilen sistemin omurgası, iki farklı araştırma konusundan yararlanılarak oluşturulmuştur: Akıllı Ağ Sorgu Motoru ve Uyum Algoritması. Farklı alanlar için önerilen bu iki araştırma konusunun bazı kesitlerinden esinlenerek geliştirilen ve kullanıcının ağ servislerini bulmasını kolaylaştıran akıllı bir sistem geliştirilmiştir.
Other ID | JA37GR89RY |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2006 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 - Volume: 2 Issue: 1 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.