Çalışmada resimlerdeki istenmeyen cisimlerin (logo, leke, reklam yazısı veya herhangi bir cisim görüntüsü gibi) mevcut görüntüde fark edilir bir bozulma oluşturmadan kaldırılması incelenmiştir. Bu hedefe ulaşmak için örnek tabanlı doku sentezine ve örüntü tekrarına dayalı bileşik görüntü iç boyama tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır.Çalışma sonucunda resimlerde istenmeyen cisimleri tamamen olmasa da çok büyük oranda kaldırıldığı gözlenmiştir. Yapılan karşılaştırmalar ağırlıklı olarak bu çalışmayla yakın algoritmaların kullanıldığı örnek tabanlı doku sentezine dayanan görüntü iç boyama yöntemiyle yapılmıştır. Bu karşılaştırmalar sonucunda çalışmada önerilen iç boyama yönteminin mevcut diğer iç boyama yöntemlerine göre daha iyi sonuçlar verdiği görülmüştür.
In this paper, the subject of removing unwanted objects (e.g. logos, stains, ads or the images of any kind of objects) from photographs without generating any perceivable distortion has been handled. An exemplar-based combine image inpainting technique relying on texture synthesis has been adopted to reach this goal.As the outcome of this work, it was observed that unwanted objects in images were removed to a very large extent, but not completely. The results presented in this paper were especially compared to the outcomes of the image inpainting methods leaning on exemplar-based texture synthesis which have similar algorithms to ours. These comparisons have shown that our results are more favorable than those obtained by existing image inpainting techniques
Other ID | JA37HH57FN |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2011 Volume: 4 Issue: 1 - Volume: 4 Issue: 1 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.