Modelleme ve benzetim teorisi ağ tasarım ve iletişim kurallarını sınama ve dinamik ağ davranışını anlamada önemli bir araçtır. En büyük ağ olan İnternetin baş döndürücü bir hızla büyümesi, yeni benzetim tekniklerini geliştirmeyi zorunlu kılmaktadır. Yapılan çalışmada geniş ölçekli ağlar için ayrık olay tabanlı yeni bir dağıtık ağ benzetim yaklaşımı geliştirilmiştir. Ayrık olay tabanlı modelleme yaklaşımı kullanılarak istemci / sunucu tabanlı, ölçeklenebilir, birden fazla işletim sisteminde çalışabilen, esnek ‘D-DEVSNET’ isimli yeni bir ağ benzetim aracının modelleme ve tasarımı gerçekleştirilmiş ve başarım çözümlemeleri yapılmıştır. Geliştirilen aracın, yaygın olarak kullanılan ağ benzetim araçlarından NS-2 ile karşılaştırması yapılmış, özellikle ölçeklenebilirlik ve bellek tüketimi bakımından avantajları gözlemlenmiştir.
Modeling and simulation theory is an important tool for testing network design and protocols as well as understanding the dynamic behavior of the network. Growth of the biggest network, Internet, at dazzling speed requires new simulation techniques. In this study, a tool was developed for design and implementation of a new discrete event based distributed simulation for large-scale networks. By using DEVS as a modeling approach, client / server based, scalable, platform-independent, flexible new network modeling and simulation tool called ‘D-DEVSNET’ was designed and performance analyzes were conducted. Developed network simulator is compared NS-2, in particularly the advantages in terms of scalability and memory consumption were observed.
Other ID | JA37KD97NJ |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 6 Issue: 1 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.