Rasgele sayı üreteçleri kriptolojik uygulamalar için önemli bir araçtır. Çünkü rasgelelik kaynağının yetersizliği tüm sistemin güvenliğini etkileyebilmektedir. Gerekli rasgele verinin frekansı ve miktarı uygulama ile büyük farklılık gösterebilmektedir. Bu yüzden kullanıcının ya yüksek kalitede rasgele veri ya da çok büyük miktarda sözde rasgele veri üretmek isteyebileceği hesaba katılmalıdır. Rasgele sayı üreteçlerinin çeşitli tipleri bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada kriptolojik uygulamalar için gürbüz rasgele sayı üreteçlerinin gereksinimlerini ve bu gereksinimleri gerçekleştirecek mimari tanımlanmıştır.
Random number generators are an important tool for cryptographic applications. Since inadequate source of randomness can be effect security of whole system. The frequency and the amount of required random data can differ greatly with the application. Therefore, random data generation should take into account the fact that the user can request either high quality random data or a great amount of pseudorandom data. There are several types of random number generators. This paper describes requirements of robust random number generators for cryptographic applications and an architecture to realize these requirements.
Other ID | JA37PC34BU |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2015 Volume: 8 Issue: 2 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.