Speaker recognition or speaker identification is the automatic recognition of the speaker by analyzing the parameters of the audio signals. Human voices contain a very high attachment to their owner. For this reason, in this study, a dataset was obtained from Youtube to determine who is from 46 different people who read Surah Yasin. Feature extraction was done from the obtained audio files with MFCC and LBP. Feature vectors have been tested with various classification algorithms and 35.10% success has been obtained for MFCC, while 90.74% success has been obtained for LBP. For person verification, 100% classification success was achieved in LBP.
Konuşmacıyı tanıma ya da konuşmacıyı tanımlama konuşmacının ses sinyallerine ait parametrelerinin analiz edilmesi ile otomatik olarak tanınmasıdır. İnsan sesleri sahibine çok yüksek bağlılık içerir. Bu nedenle bu çalışmada Yasin Suresini okuyan 46 farklı kişiden kim olduğunu belirlemek için Youtube üzerinden veri kümesi elde edilmiştir. Elde edilen ses dosyalarından MFCC ve LBP ile öznitelik çıkarımı yapılmıştır. Öznitelik vektörleri çeşitli sınıflandırma algoritmaları ile sınanmış ve MFCC için %35,10 başarı elde edilirken LBP için %90,74 oranında başarılı sonuçlar elde edilmiştir. Kişi doğrulama için ise LBP’de %100 sınıflandırma başarısı elde edilmiştir.
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Engineering |
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Early Pub Date | December 3, 2022 |
Publication Date | December 15, 2022 |
Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 15 Issue: 2 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.