COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES

Volume: 5 Number: 4 April 1, 2011
  • Meltem Özgüner
  • Betül T Avil
  • Yasin Köksal
  • Elif Canal
  • İkbal Ok Bozkaya
  • Bahattin Tunç
TR EN

Farklı Hematopoetik Kök Hücre Kaynaklarının Koloni Colony Forming Unit-Assay Oluşturma Kapasitelerinin Karşılaştırılması

Abstract

Giriş ve Amaç: Günümüzde Hematopoetik Kök Hücre Nakli (HKHN) özellikle hematolojik malignitelerin tedavisinde başarıyla uygulanmaktadır. Hematopoetik kök hücre (HKH) kaynağı olarak allojenik nakillerde genellikle direkt kemik iliğinden, otolog nakillerde ise genellikle kemik iliğinden mobilize edilip periferik kandan elde edilen hematopoetik kök hücreler kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen hematopoetik kök hücrelerin koloni oluşturma kapasitelerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hematopoetik kök hücre örnekleri 7 olguda direk kemik iliğinden, 7 olguda da periferik kandan elde edildi. Elde edilen hematopoetik kök hücrelerle invitro hücre kültür ortamlarına alındı. Periferik kan ve kemik iliği kaynaklı HKH örnekleri uygun Semi-Solid Agar besiyerinde (Methocult, H 4434 Classic, Stem Cell Technologies, Canada) kültüre edilerek 14-18 gün sonra koloni sayıları belirlenerek Colony Forming Unit Assay (CFU-Assay) hesaplandı.Bulgular: Otolog 7 vericiden alınan periferik kan HKH örneklerinin koloni sayımlarının ortalamaları CFU-GM:28.44x104/kg, BFU-E:40.7x104/kg, CFU-E:0.79x104/kg, CFU-GEMM :1.95x104/kg. Allojenik 7 vericiden alınan kemik iliği HKH örneklerinin Koloni sayımlarının ortalamaları CFU-GM:7.03x104/kg, BFU-E:10.46x104/kg, CFU-E:0.16x104/kg, CFU-GEMM :0.51x104/kg.Sonuç: CFU-Assay ile değerlendirilen periferik kan kaynaklı HKH kolonilerinin sayısı kemik iliği kaynaklı HKH kolonilere göre daha yüksek bulundu. Hematopoetik kök hücre nakillerinde özellikle erişkinlerde periferik kan kaynaklı hematopoetik kök hücrelerin kullanımı giderek yaygınlaşmaktadır. Pediatrik grupta da klinik verilerle invitro hücre kültür bulgularının desteklenmesi periferik kan kaynaklı HKH kullanımı için tercih sebebi olabilir.

Keywords

References

  1. Thomas ED, Lochte HL, Lu WC, Ferrebee JW. Intravenous infu- sion of bone marrow in patients receiving radiation and chemo- therapy. N Eng J Med 1957;257(11):491-6.
  2. Thomas ED, Lochte HL Jr, Canon JH, Sahler OD, Ferrebee JW. Supralethal whole body irradiation and isologous marrow trans- plantation in man. J Clin Investigat 1959;38:1709-16.
  3. Thomas ED, Collins JA, Herman EC, Ferrebee JW. Marrow transplants in lethally irradiated dogs given methotrexate. Blood 1962;19:217-28.
  4. Thomas ED, Buckner CD, Storb R, Neiman PE, Fefer A, Clift RA, et al. Aplastic anaemia treated by marrow transplantation. Lancet 1972;1(7745)284-9.
  5. Thomas ED, Storb R, Clift RA, Fefer A, Johnson FL, Neiman PE, et al. Bone marrow transplantation (second of two parts). N Eng J Med 1975;292(17):895-902.
  6. Thomas ED, Flournoy N, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Fefer A, Neiman PE, et al. Cure of leukemia by marrow transplantation. Leukemia Research 1977;1(1):67-70.
  7. Good RA, Meuwissen HJ, Hong R, Gatti RA. Bone marrow trans- plantation: correction of immune deficit in lymphopenic immu- nologic deficiency and correction of an immunologically induced pancytopenia. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 1969;82:278-85.
  8. Good RA, Gatti RA, Hong R, Meuwissen HJ. Graft treatment of immunological deficiency. Lancet 1969;1(7606):1162.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Meltem Özgüner This is me

Betül T Avil This is me

Yasin Köksal This is me

Elif Canal This is me

İkbal Ok Bozkaya This is me

Bahattin Tunç This is me

Publication Date

April 1, 2011

Submission Date

April 1, 2011

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 5 Number: 4

APA
Özgüner, M., Avil, B. T., Köksal, Y., Canal, E., Bozkaya, İ. O., & Tunç, B. (2011). COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi, 5(4), 197-201. https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF
AMA
1.Özgüner M, Avil BT, Köksal Y, Canal E, Bozkaya İO, Tunç B. COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES. Turkish J Pediatr Dis. 2011;5(4):197-201. https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF
Chicago
Özgüner, Meltem, Betül T Avil, Yasin Köksal, Elif Canal, İkbal Ok Bozkaya, and Bahattin Tunç. 2011. “COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES”. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi 5 (4): 197-201. https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF.
EndNote
Özgüner M, Avil BT, Köksal Y, Canal E, Bozkaya İO, Tunç B (April 1, 2011) COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi 5 4 197–201.
IEEE
[1]M. Özgüner, B. T. Avil, Y. Köksal, E. Canal, İ. O. Bozkaya, and B. Tunç, “COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES”, Turkish J Pediatr Dis, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 197–201, Apr. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF
ISNAD
Özgüner, Meltem - Avil, Betül T - Köksal, Yasin - Canal, Elif - Bozkaya, İkbal Ok - Tunç, Bahattin. “COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES”. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi 5/4 (April 1, 2011): 197-201. https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF.
JAMA
1.Özgüner M, Avil BT, Köksal Y, Canal E, Bozkaya İO, Tunç B. COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES. Turkish J Pediatr Dis. 2011;5:197–201.
MLA
Özgüner, Meltem, et al. “COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES”. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 4, Apr. 2011, pp. 197-01, https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF.
Vancouver
1.Meltem Özgüner, Betül T Avil, Yasin Köksal, Elif Canal, İkbal Ok Bozkaya, Bahattin Tunç. COMPARISON OF COLONY FORMING UNIT-ASSAY RESULTS OF DIFFERENT HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL SOURCES. Turkish J Pediatr Dis [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1;5(4):197-201. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA52ZC99YF


The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.


Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.


The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.