Comparison of Early Language Skills of Premature and Full-term Infants
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare receptive and expressive language skills in premature and full-term babies under the newborn hearing screening follow-up program.
Material and Methods: A total of 130 babies were evaluated, of which 68 were premature and 62 were healthy full-term babies. Hearing function was assessed in all infants with the Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) tests according to hospital’s screening protocol and found normal in all. Assessment of receptive and expressive language skills in both premature and full-term babies was based on the Preschool Language Scale-Fifth Edition (PLS-5) language test. PLS-5 items were applied face-to-face with the mothers of the babies, using the question-answer technique. The test time is on average 80 days for premature babies and 41 days for term babies.
Results: As a result of the study, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of auditory perception and expressive language age (p>0.05). Nevertheless, the results showed a high positive correlation between auditory perception and expressive language age in premature infants and a moderate positive correlation between the same in full-term babies. In both infant groups, auditory perception skills increase in parallel with the expressive language skills.
Conclusion: Premature birth is a risk factor for language development and negative effects begin to show as the premature baby grows (especially after 6-12 months). Therefore, it is important to monitor and assess premature babies during the critical age bracket of linguistic development, which is 0-2 years, for an early diagnosis and treatment of linguistic delays that may affect them later in life.
Keywords
References
- 1. Soysal AS. Bebeklik Psikiyatrisinde Alternatif Bir Alt Alan: Erken Doğan Bebekler. Asimetrik Paralel: İstanbul, 2007.
- 2. Trawick-Swith J. Early Childhood Development (A Multicultural Perspective). 5th Ed. Nobel: Ankara, 2013.
- 3. Santrock JW. Life-Span Development. 13th Ed. Nobel: Ankara, 2015.
- 4. Msall ME, Tremont MR. Measuring functional outcomes after prematurity: developmental impact of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight status on childhood disability. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8(4):258-272. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10046
- 5. Xu Y, Filler JW. Linking assessment and intervention for developmental/ functional outcomes of premature, low- birth-weight children. Early Child Educ J 2005; 32:6–13.
- 6. Ertem IO, Bayhan A, Bayram O. Prematüre Bebeklerin Gelişimlerinin İzlenmesi ve Desteklenmesi. Gelişimsel Pediatri Kitabı. Çocuk Hastalıkları Araştırma Vakfı, 2005.
- 7. American Academy of Pediatrics. Follow up Care of High Risk Infants. Pediatr 2004; 114(5):1377–97.
- 8. World Health Organization (WHO). Preterm birth 2015.(Accessed 05 December 2018). Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/en/
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
November 26, 2021
Submission Date
August 13, 2020
Acceptance Date
November 11, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2021 Volume: 15 Number: 6