BibTex RIS Cite

İlaç Alerjisine Tanısal Yaklaşım

Year 2015, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 66 - 70, 01.04.2015

Abstract

İlaç alerjileri ani ortaya çıkan ve hayatı tehdit edebilen reaksiyonlar olup tüm istenmeyen ilaç reaksiyonlarının %10-15’ini oluşturmaktadır. Klinik pratikte, aileler çocuklarında ortaya çıkan çeşitli istenmeyen ilaç reaksiyonlarını ilaç alerjisi olarak bildirebilmektedir. Hekimler ise çoğu zaman tanısal testler yapmadan sadece klinik öyküye ve hasta ya da hasta yakınının beyanına dayalı olarak ilaç alerjisi tanısı koymaktadır. Dolayısıyla, sadece ilaç alerjisi şüphesi çoğu zaman gereksiz ilaç alerjisi tanısının konulmasına ve tedavide daha pahalı, daha az etkin, yan etkisi daha fazla ilaçların reçete edilmesine neden olmaktadır. İlaç alerjisi şüphesi olan hastalarda ilaç alerjisi tanısı konulabilmesi için öncelikle detaylı öykü alınmalıdır. Öykü ile ilaç alerjisi dışlanamayan hastalarda deri testleri ve in vitro testler ile tanı konulmaya çalışılmalıdır. Bu testlerin negatif olduğu veya yapılmasının mümkün olmadığı hastalarda kontrendikasyon yok ise tanı için altın standart olan ilaç provokasyon testi yapılmalıdır.

References

  • Gomes ER, Demoly P. Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;5:309-16.
  • Schnyder B. Approach to the patient with drug allergy. Med Clin North Am 2010; 94:665-79.
  • Borch JE, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The prevalence of suspected and challenge-verifi ed penicillin allergy in a university hospital population. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006;98:357-62.
  • Sade K, Holtzer I, Levo Y, Kivity S. The economic burden of antibiotic treatment of penicillin-allergic patients in internal medicine wards of a general tertiary care hospital. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:501-6.

Diagnostic Evaluation of Drug Allergy

Year 2015, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 66 - 70, 01.04.2015

Abstract

Drug allergies are serious acute and potentially life-threatening reactions that constitute 10-15% of all drug-related adverse reactions. In clinical practice, parents may wrongly report various adverse drug reactions their children experienced as a drug allergy. Physicians often make the diagnosis of a drug allergy based on patient or caregiver accounts rather than standard diagnostic tests. Thus, only a suspicion of a drug allergy is usually enough to make a diagnosis and to prescribe an alternative drug that is generally more expensive and less effective, with more potential side effects. A detailed clinical history of the reaction should be the fi rst step in patients with a suspicion of drug allergy. If the drug allergy cannot be excluded with the clinical history, skin tests and further in vitro tests should be performed. In patients in whom these tests are not informative or not available, a drug allergy diagnosis should be made with a drug provocation test, the gold standard, unless there is a contraindication

References

  • Gomes ER, Demoly P. Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;5:309-16.
  • Schnyder B. Approach to the patient with drug allergy. Med Clin North Am 2010; 94:665-79.
  • Borch JE, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The prevalence of suspected and challenge-verifi ed penicillin allergy in a university hospital population. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2006;98:357-62.
  • Sade K, Holtzer I, Levo Y, Kivity S. The economic burden of antibiotic treatment of penicillin-allergic patients in internal medicine wards of a general tertiary care hospital. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:501-6.
There are 4 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA54SE52NA
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mustafa Erkoçoğlu This is me

Emine Dibek Mısırlıoğlu This is me

Can Naci Kocabaş This is me

Publication Date April 1, 2015
Submission Date April 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Cite

Vancouver Erkoçoğlu M, Mısırlıoğlu ED, Kocabaş CN. Diagnostic Evaluation of Drug Allergy. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg. 2015;9(1):66-70.


The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.


Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication, with at least 10 original articles in each issue, taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.


The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.