BibTex RIS Cite

Konjenital Koanal Atrezide Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Bulguları

Year 2013, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 183 - 187, 01.12.2013

Abstract

Amaç: Konjenital koanal atrezi nazal kavite ve nazofarenks arasında açıklığı sağlayan posterior koananın, unilateral veya bilateral olarak total obstrüksiyonudur. Bu çalışmada, bu tip olgularda bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularını araştırmak ve analiz etmek amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hastanemizde 2005-2013 yılları arasında kongenital koanal atrezi tespit edilen ve radyoloji bölümümüzde kontrastsız nazofarinks bilgisayarlı tomografisi ile incelenen 30 hasta (1gün - 1 yaş, ort 14 gün; 21:K, 9:E) çalışmaya dahil edildi. Olguların bilgisayarlı tomografi görüntüleri ve medikal bilgileri ‘Picture Archiving and Communications System’ üzerinden retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Otuz olgunun 17’sinde (%57) bilateral, 13’inde (%43) unilateral konjenital koanal atrezi izlendi. Yedi olguda (%23.3) membranöz, 7 olguda (%23.3) miks,16 (%53.3) olguda kemik tip atrezi saptandı. Unilateral olguların 7’sinde (%54); bilateral olanların 12’sinde (%70) kardiyak ve kraniyofasiyal anomaliler başta olmak üzere eşlik eden konjenital anomali saptandı. Olguların %33’ünde (6 bilateral, 4 unilateral olguda) CHARGE Sendromu mevcuttu. Geriye kalan olguların 7’sinde başka sendromlar tespit edildi.Sonuç: Bizim serimizde koanal atrezi daha çok kemik tipte ve bilateral olarak izlenmiştir. Diğer konjenital anomaliler özellikle bilateral tipte sıklıkla eşlik etmektedir. Bilateral konjenital koanal atrezi zorunlu nazal solunum yapan yenidoğanda medikal bir acildir. Bilgisayarlı tomografi koanal atrezide tanının doğrulanmasında, tipinin belirlenmesinde, diğer nazal kavite obstrüksiyonu nedenlerinin saptanmasında etkili, değerli ve kolay ulaşılabilir bir yöntemdir.

References

  • Petkovska l, Petkovska I, Ramadan S, Aslam MO. CT evaluation of congenital choanal atresia: Our experience and review of the literature. Australas Radiol 2007;51:236-9.
  • Slovis Tl, Eggli DF. Congenital anomalies and acquired lesions. In: Jerald P Kuhn; Thomas l. Slovis, Jack O. Haller, (editors). Caffey’s Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging, Volume 1. 10th ed. uSA: Elsevier, 2004;22-28.
  • Slovis Tl, Renfro B, Watts FB, Kuhns lR, Belenky W, Spoylar J. Choanal atresia: Precise CT evaluation. Radiology 1985;155: 345-8.
  • Jones JE, Young E, Heier l. Cogenital bony nasal cavity deformities. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:81-6.
  • Jonniaux E, Brihaye P, Bernheim n, Mansbach Al. Apertura pyriformis stenosis in the newborn. B-EnT 2006;2:31-3.
  • Bignault A, Castillo M. Congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 1994;15:877-8.
  • Tadmor R, Ravid M, Millet D, leventon G. Computed tomographic demonstration of choanal atresia. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 1984;5:743-5.
  • Brown OE, Pownell P, Manning SC. Choanal atresia: A new anatomic classification and clinical management applications. laryngoscope 1998;106:97-101.
  • Hsu CY, li YW, Hsu JC. Congenital choanal atresia: Computed tomographic and clinical findings. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 1999;40:13-7.
  • Rombaux P, Hamoir M, Gilain V, Verellen G, Debauche C, Clapuyt P, et al. Choanal atresia: A retrospective study of 39 cases. Rev laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2001; 122:147–54.
  • Gujrathi CS, Daniel SJ, James Al, Vito F. Management of bilateral choanal atresia in the neonate: An institutional review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:399–407.
  • Morimoto AK, Wiggins RH 3rd, Hudgins PA, Hedlund Gl, Hamilton B, Mukherji SK, Telian SA, Harnsberger HR. Absent semicircular canals in CHARGE syndrome: Radiologic spectrum of findings. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 2006;27:1663-71.
  • Chakraborty S, Chakraborty J. CHARGE association. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012;16:501–3.
  • Rejjal A, Alaiyan S, Coates R, Abuzeid M. The prevalence and spectrum of brain abnormalities in congenital choanal atresia. neuropediatrics 1994;25:85-8.

Computed Tomography Findings in Congenital Choanal Atresia

Year 2013, Volume: 7 Issue: 4, 183 - 187, 01.12.2013

Abstract

Objective: Congenital choanal atresia is the total unilateral or bilateral obstruction of posterior choanae that connect the nasal cavity with the nasopharynx. The aim of this study was to investigate and analyse the computed tomography findings in such cases.Material and Methods: Computed tomography images and medical records of 30 children (21F: 9M, age range 1 day to 2 years, mean age 14 days) diagnosed with congenital choanal atresia between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively reevaluated by using the Picture Archiving and Communications System.results: Among 30 congenital choanal atresia cases, 17 (57%) were bilateral and 13 (43%) were unilateral. There were 7 (23.3%) membranous, 7 (23.3%) mixed and 16 (53.3%) bony atresia cases. Associated congenital anomalies were found in 54% of unilateral and in 70% of bilateral cases. At least four of the six criteria of the CHARGE association were present in 6 of the bilateral and 4 of the unilateral cases (total 33%). conclusion: Choanal atresia was found to be more commonly bilateral and usually of the bony type in our series. Other congenital anomalies were found to frequently accompany congenital choanal atresia, especially when bilateral. Computed tomography is a valuable and easily accessible diagnostic tool and should be the modality of choice to evaluate neonates with nasal obstruction

References

  • Petkovska l, Petkovska I, Ramadan S, Aslam MO. CT evaluation of congenital choanal atresia: Our experience and review of the literature. Australas Radiol 2007;51:236-9.
  • Slovis Tl, Eggli DF. Congenital anomalies and acquired lesions. In: Jerald P Kuhn; Thomas l. Slovis, Jack O. Haller, (editors). Caffey’s Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging, Volume 1. 10th ed. uSA: Elsevier, 2004;22-28.
  • Slovis Tl, Renfro B, Watts FB, Kuhns lR, Belenky W, Spoylar J. Choanal atresia: Precise CT evaluation. Radiology 1985;155: 345-8.
  • Jones JE, Young E, Heier l. Cogenital bony nasal cavity deformities. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:81-6.
  • Jonniaux E, Brihaye P, Bernheim n, Mansbach Al. Apertura pyriformis stenosis in the newborn. B-EnT 2006;2:31-3.
  • Bignault A, Castillo M. Congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 1994;15:877-8.
  • Tadmor R, Ravid M, Millet D, leventon G. Computed tomographic demonstration of choanal atresia. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 1984;5:743-5.
  • Brown OE, Pownell P, Manning SC. Choanal atresia: A new anatomic classification and clinical management applications. laryngoscope 1998;106:97-101.
  • Hsu CY, li YW, Hsu JC. Congenital choanal atresia: Computed tomographic and clinical findings. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 1999;40:13-7.
  • Rombaux P, Hamoir M, Gilain V, Verellen G, Debauche C, Clapuyt P, et al. Choanal atresia: A retrospective study of 39 cases. Rev laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2001; 122:147–54.
  • Gujrathi CS, Daniel SJ, James Al, Vito F. Management of bilateral choanal atresia in the neonate: An institutional review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:399–407.
  • Morimoto AK, Wiggins RH 3rd, Hudgins PA, Hedlund Gl, Hamilton B, Mukherji SK, Telian SA, Harnsberger HR. Absent semicircular canals in CHARGE syndrome: Radiologic spectrum of findings. AJnR Am J neuroradiol 2006;27:1663-71.
  • Chakraborty S, Chakraborty J. CHARGE association. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2012;16:501–3.
  • Rejjal A, Alaiyan S, Coates R, Abuzeid M. The prevalence and spectrum of brain abnormalities in congenital choanal atresia. neuropediatrics 1994;25:85-8.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA68FT53KH
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ayşe Seçil Ekşioğlu This is me

Hasibe Gökçe Çınar This is me

Saliha Şenel This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2013
Submission Date December 1, 2013
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 7 Issue: 4

Cite

Vancouver Ekşioğlu AS, Çınar HG, Şenel S. Computed Tomography Findings in Congenital Choanal Atresia. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg. 2013;7(4):183-7.


The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.


Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication, with at least 10 original articles in each issue, taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.


The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.