Abstract
Background: Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is defined as the glucose intolerance started or
diagnosed first at pregnancy. GDM screening tests are applied as single or
two-step tests. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the numbers and
positiveness ratios of single or two-step screening tests.
Materials and Methods:
The number of GDM screening test pregnant women applied to Ankara Numune
training and Research Hospital Biochemistry Clinic between years 2010-2014 were
evaluated from Hospital Laboratory Information System retrospectively, and
applied numbers of one and two step screening tests and positiveness ratios
were evalauted fort his 5 year period.
Results:
281 (18,5%) of the total 1514 tests were positive. 270 (96,1%) of this positive
results were obtained by one-step test and 11 (3,9%) of them were obtained by
two-step test. In year 2011, all screening tests were carried out by one-step
approach. In years 2012-2014, single step approach was appplied in increasing
ratios. GDM detection rate of sinle-step test was found to be higher than
two-step test.
Conclusion:
Single step approach can be the test of choice for GDM screening as it has a
higher detection rate and more comfortable fort he patient.
References
- 1. Beckmann CRB, Ling FW, Smith RP, et al., editors. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
- 2. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dung-er DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fi;h International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30:251-260.
- 3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin, authors. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:525–538.
- 4. Diabetes Care; Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; 14–16 March 1997; Chicago, Illinois, USA. 1998. pp. B1–B167.
- 5. Vitacolonna E, Succurro E, Lapolla A, Scavini M, Bonomo M, Di Cianni G, Di Benedetto A, Napoli A, Tumminia A, Festa C, Lencioni C, Torlone E, Sesti G, Mannino D, Purrello F. Guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Italy from 2010 to 2019: critical issues and the potential for improvement. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01397-4.
- 6. Alves DS, de Moura Ferreira Gomes MC, de Araújo Novaes M.An Obstetric Application Architecture for Information, Diagnosis and Control of Diabetes in High Risk Pregnancy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:778-782. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190329
- 7. Albrecht SS, Kuklina EV, Bansil P, Jamieson DJ, Whiteman MK, Kourtis AP, et al. Diabetes trends among delivery hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994-2004. Diabetes Care 2010;33:768-773.
- 8. Amanda “Bird” Hoffert Gilmartin, Serdar H Ural, ohn T Repke.Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Summer; 1(3): 129–134.
- 9. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B,Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classi)cation of hyperglycemia in preg-nancy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-682
Abstract
Amaç: Gestasyonel
Diyabetes Mellitus (GDM), ilk defa gebelikte başlayan veya teşhis edilen glukoz
intoleransıdır.. GDM tarama testleri tek veya iki aşamalı uygulanabilmektedir. Bu
çalışmanın amacı, , tek ve iki aşamalı tarama test sayılarının ve
pozitiflik oranlarını karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirmektir.
Gereç
ve yöntem: Çalışmada 2010-2014 yılları arasında Ankara
Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıbbi Biyokimya Kliniği’ne GDM tarama
testi için başvuran gebelere yapılan Oral Glukoz Tolerans Testi (OGTT) sayıları
HBYS üzerinden taranmış, İki aşamalı
tarama testi (50g ve 100g) ile tek aşamalı (75g) tarama protokollerinin yıllara
göre değişen sayıları ve pozitiflik oranları 5 yıllık süreçte retrospektif
olarak incelenmiştir.
Bulgular: Yapılan
toplam 1514 testin 281’i (%18,5) pozitiftir. Pozitif sonuçların 270’i (%96,1)
tek aşamalı, 11’i (%3,9) iki aşamalı test ile elde edilmiştir. 2011 yılında tüm tarama testleri tek aşamalı
olarak yapılmıştır. 2012-2014 yıllarında tek aşamalı test giderek artan
oranlarla uygulanmıştır. Tek aşamalı testin GDM tespit oranları iki aşamalı
teste göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: Gebelerde
GDM’yi yüksek oranda saptaması ve hasta açısından daha rahat olması nedeniyle
tek aşamalı tarama testi tercih edilmelidir.
References
- 1. Beckmann CRB, Ling FW, Smith RP, et al., editors. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
- 2. Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, de Leiva A, Dung-er DB, Hadden DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fi;h International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jul;30:251-260.
- 3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin, authors. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:525–538.
- 4. Diabetes Care; Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; 14–16 March 1997; Chicago, Illinois, USA. 1998. pp. B1–B167.
- 5. Vitacolonna E, Succurro E, Lapolla A, Scavini M, Bonomo M, Di Cianni G, Di Benedetto A, Napoli A, Tumminia A, Festa C, Lencioni C, Torlone E, Sesti G, Mannino D, Purrello F. Guidelines for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in Italy from 2010 to 2019: critical issues and the potential for improvement. Acta Diabetol. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01397-4.
- 6. Alves DS, de Moura Ferreira Gomes MC, de Araújo Novaes M.An Obstetric Application Architecture for Information, Diagnosis and Control of Diabetes in High Risk Pregnancy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:778-782. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190329
- 7. Albrecht SS, Kuklina EV, Bansil P, Jamieson DJ, Whiteman MK, Kourtis AP, et al. Diabetes trends among delivery hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994-2004. Diabetes Care 2010;33:768-773.
- 8. Amanda “Bird” Hoffert Gilmartin, Serdar H Ural, ohn T Repke.Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Summer; 1(3): 129–134.
- 9. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel, Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B,Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, et al. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classi)cation of hyperglycemia in preg-nancy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-682
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Internal Diseases |
| Journal Section | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 23, 2019 |
| Submission Date | October 2, 2019 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2019 Volume: 13 Issue: 6 |
The publication language of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease is English.
Manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease will go through a double-blind peer-review process. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in the field, in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent editor to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions. Articles accepted for publication in the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics are put in the order of publication, with at least 10 original articles in each issue, taking into account the acceptance dates. If the articles sent to the reviewers for evaluation are assessed as a senior for publication by the reviewers, the section editor and the editor considering all aspects (originality, high scientific quality and citation potential), it receives publication priority in addition to the articles assigned for the next issue.
The aim of the Turkish Journal of Pediatrics is to publish high-quality original research articles that will contribute to the international literature in the field of general pediatric health and diseases and its sub-branches. It also publishes editorial opinions, letters to the editor, reviews, case reports, book reviews, comments on previously published articles, meeting and conference proceedings, announcements, and biography. In addition to the field of child health and diseases, the journal also includes articles prepared in fields such as surgery, dentistry, public health, nutrition and dietetics, social services, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, educational sciences, sociology and nursing, provided that they are related to this field. can be published.