ON OBLIGATORY CONTROL IN TURKISH AND NOGHAY COMPLEMENT CLAUSES

Volume: 2 Number: 2 December 1, 2013
  • Birsel Karakoç
EN TR

ON OBLIGATORY CONTROL IN TURKISH AND NOGHAY COMPLEMENT CLAUSES

Abstract

The present paper is concerned with ‘obligatory’ control in non-­‐finite complement clauses in Turkish and Noghay. Control in complement clauses implies an ‘obligatory’ co-­‐reference between the subject of a complement clause and the subject or object of its matrix clause. The unexpressed, implicit subject of the embedded predicate is thus specified by the overt argument of the matrix clause. Following questions are taken into consideration: (1) Which matrix predicates appear as heads of complement clauses implying subject/ object controls? (2) Which properties do the argument structures of these verbs exhibit? (3) Which morpho-­‐syntactic restrictions are found in complement clauses implying control relations? (4) Which bound morphemes are used in such complement clauses? (5) Are there any restrictions in the use of the bound morphemes? One of the main results is that the bound morphemes used in control constructions differ in Turkish and Noghay. In Noghay, there are two bound morphemes: -­‐MAGA and -­‐(U)w. The former has apparently developed from the infinitive in the dative case and occurs in grammaticalized constructions. The latter can be combined with different case markers and possessive suffixes. In Noghay, the participial morpheme -­‐GAn and the converbial morpheme -­‐(I)p can also be found with some matrix predicates in control constructions.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Birsel Karakoç This is me

Publication Date

December 1, 2013

Submission Date

December 1, 2013

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 2 Number: 2

APA
Karakoç, B. (2013). TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM. Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi, 2(2), 303-323. https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN
AMA
1.Karakoç B. TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM. JofEL. 2013;2(2):303-323. https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN
Chicago
Karakoç, Birsel. 2013. “TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM”. Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi 2 (2): 303-23. https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN.
EndNote
Karakoç B (December 1, 2013) TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM. Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi 2 2 303–323.
IEEE
[1]B. Karakoç, “TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM”, JofEL, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 303–323, Dec. 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN
ISNAD
Karakoç, Birsel. “TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM”. Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi 2/2 (December 1, 2013): 303-323. https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN.
JAMA
1.Karakoç B. TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM. JofEL. 2013;2:303–323.
MLA
Karakoç, Birsel. “TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM”. Tehlikedeki Diller Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 2, Dec. 2013, pp. 303-2, https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN.
Vancouver
1.Birsel Karakoç. TÜRKÇE VE NOGAYCADA TÜMLEÇ YAN CÜMLELERİNDE ZORUNLU DENETİM. JofEL [Internet]. 2013 Dec. 1;2(2):303-2. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA36FR85MN