Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images

Volume: 15 Number: 3 September 30, 2026
EN TR

Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images

Abstract

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and early detection plays a crucial role in improving treatment success and patient survival. In this study, the problem of lesion segmentation in lung computed tomography (CT) images was addressed, and the performance of different U-Net-based deep learning architectures was comparatively evaluated. The dataset used in this study consisted of 22,782 CT slices obtained from 223 patients. Among these images, 3,584 slices contained lesions, while 19,198 slices were healthy images. To investigate the impact of class imbalance in the dataset on model performance, three different experimental scenarios were applied: using only lesion-containing images, using all images together, and using a balanced training dataset. Segmentation performance was analyzed using both image-based and patient-based evaluation approaches. The results indicate that data distribution has a significant impact on segmentation performance. In particular, balancing the training dataset improved the results, especially in patient-based evaluations.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

TUBİTAK

Project Number

125E062

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of İnönü University (Date: 30.07.2024, Session No: 13, Decision No: 2024/6289).

Thanks

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) under the 1001 Scientific and Technological Research Projects Support Program (Project No: 125E062).

References

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-63. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
  2. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016. p. 770-8. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
  3. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JHM, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances since the 2004 Classification. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2015;10(9):1243-60. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630
  4. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
  5. Riquelme D, Akhloufi MA. Deep Learning for Lung Cancer Nodules Detection and Classification in CT Scans. AI. 2020;1(1):28-67. doi:10.3390/ai1010003
  6. Wang X, Wang L, Zheng P. SC-Dynamic R-CNN: A Self-Calibrated Dynamic R-CNN Model for Lung Cancer Lesion Detection. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:9452157. doi:10.1155/2022/9452157
  7. Hanbay K, Çalışan M, Özdemir TB. SAR Ship Detection Using Image Histograms and Machine Learning Approach. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science. 2024;13(3):171-175. doi:10.46810/tdfd.1528267
  8. Gu Y, Lu X, Yang L, Zhang B, Yu D, Zhao Y, et al. Automatic lung nodule detection using a 3D deep convolutional neural network combined with a multi-scale prediction strategy in chest CTs. Comput Biol Med. 2018;103:220-31. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.011

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Biomedical Imaging

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2026

Submission Date

March 11, 2026

Acceptance Date

May 13, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 3

APA
Kılıç, M., Yelman, A., Üzen, H., Fırat, H., Balıkçı Çiçek, İ., Bıyıklı, M., & Şengür, A. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science, 15(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1907062
AMA
1.Kılıç M, Yelman A, Üzen H, et al. Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images. TJNS. 2026;15(3):1-11. doi:10.46810/tdfd.1907062
Chicago
Kılıç, Murat, Abdulkadir Yelman, Hüseyin Üzen, et al. 2026. “Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images”. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science 15 (3): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1907062.
EndNote
Kılıç M, Yelman A, Üzen H, Fırat H, Balıkçı Çiçek İ, Bıyıklı M, Şengür A (September 1, 2026) Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science 15 3 1–11.
IEEE
[1]M. Kılıç et al., “Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images”, TJNS, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–11, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.46810/tdfd.1907062.
ISNAD
Kılıç, Murat - Yelman, Abdulkadir - Üzen, Hüseyin - Fırat, Hüseyin - Balıkçı Çiçek, İpek - Bıyıklı, Merve - Şengür, Abdülkadir. “Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images”. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science 15/3 (September 1, 2026): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46810/tdfd.1907062.
JAMA
1.Kılıç M, Yelman A, Üzen H, Fırat H, Balıkçı Çiçek İ, Bıyıklı M, Şengür A. Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images. TJNS. 2026;15:1–11.
MLA
Kılıç, Murat, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images”. Turkish Journal of Nature and Science, vol. 15, no. 3, Sept. 2026, pp. 1-11, doi:10.46810/tdfd.1907062.
Vancouver
1.Murat Kılıç, Abdulkadir Yelman, Hüseyin Üzen, Hüseyin Fırat, İpek Balıkçı Çiçek, Merve Bıyıklı, Abdülkadir Şengür. Comparative Evaluation of U-Net-Based Models for Lung Lesion Segmentation in CT Images. TJNS. 2026 Sep. 1;15(3):1-11. doi:10.46810/tdfd.1907062