STUDY INTO THE VIEWS OF CLASSROOM TEACHERS UPON INTEREST-BASED LEARNING IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 0 - 0, 15.12.2017

Fethi Kayalar Türkan Güler Arı

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine and evaluate the views of classroom teachers teaching in primary schools over the approaches toward Interestbased Learning in classroom. We asked three open ended questions to the participant teachers to obtain the data: How do you determine the interests of your students? , “What do you usually do to promote your students’ skills and interest in learning?” and “How do your students react your attitude to Interest-based Learning Strategy?” A qualitative research method was used to evaluate and compare the views of classroom teachers on the strategies for Interest-based Learning. The research was carried out with the participation of nineteen classroom teachers working in various Primary Schools in some cities in Turkey. The views of classroom teachers obtained through face-toface interviews and e-mails suggest that their approaches toward what they do to promote the students’ interest in learning include using adaptive learning for unattended students to foster their interest in learning, communicating with families about students’ interests and skills in learning, providing children with preferences including culturally relevant materials and activities, taking the time to get to know the students and one-by one relations with the students. This paper draws attention to the views and practices of classroom teachers as a means of increasing awareness of Interest-based Learning in classroom environment. 

Keywords

Interest-based learning, adaptive learning, classroom management, classroom teacher

References

• ALEXANDER, P. A., JETTON, T. L. & KULIKOWICH, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559-575. BLOM, J. (2000). Personalization – a taxonomy. Student Posters CHI 2000. BOSCOLO, P. & MASON, L. (2003). Topic knowledge, text coherence, and interest: How they interact in learning from instructional texts. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(2), 126-148. doi: 10.1080/00220970309602060 BRASWELL, R. & BROWN, J. (1992). Use of interactive videodisc technology in a physical education methods class. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco (ERIC ED 348 936). DECI, E. L. & RYAN, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum. DENZIN, N. K. & LINCOLN, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp.1-20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. ECCLES, J. S. (1987). Gender Roles and Women’s Achievement-Related Decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172. doi:10.1111/j.14716402.1987.tb00781.x. ECCLES, J. S. & WIGFIELD, A. (2002). Motivational Beliefs, Values, and Goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. ECCLES, J. S., ADLER, T. F., FUTTERMAN, R., GOFF, S., KACZALA, C. M., MEECE, J. L., & MIDGLEY, C. (1983). Expectancies, Values, and Academic Behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and Achievement Motivation (pp. 75-146). San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman. FAN, J. P. & MACREDIE, R. D. (2006). Gender Differences and Hypermedia Navigation: Principles for Adaptive Hypermedia Learning Systems. Advances in web-based education: personalized learning environments / George D. Magoulas and SherryY. Chen, editors.1st Chapter. Information Science Publishing, UK. HANCOCK, T. E., STOCK, W. A. & SWINDELL, L. K. (1996). Gender and Development Differences in the Academic Study Behaviors of Elementary School Children. Journal of Experimental School Education, 65(1), 18-39. HIDI, S. (2006). Interest: A Unique Motivational Variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001 KAYALAR, F. & GÜLER ARI, T. (2016). Views of Language Teachers over Positive Relationships with Language Learners for Successful Classroom Management. Proceedings of IAC-TLEl. KAYALAR, F. & KAYALAR, F. (2016). The Effects of Auditory Learning Strategy on Learning Skills of Language Learners (Students’ Views). IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 22(2). KAYALAR, F. (2016). Views of Teachers on the Transition and Implementation of Competency Based Education into Classroom Environment: a Cross-Cultural Perspective Proceedings of IAC-GETL in Vienna, 66-74, ISBN 978-80-906231-7-0. KIŞLA, T. & ŞAHİN, M. (2015). Kişiselleştirilmiş (Kişiye Özgü) Öğrenme-Öğretme Yaklaşımı. Gülay Ekici (ed.), Etkinlik Örnekleriyle Güncel Öğrenme-Öğretme Yaklaşımları-II (s. 172-208. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. LEONG, S. & HAWAMDEH, S. (1999). Gender and Learning Attitudes in Using Webbased Science Lessons. Information Research, 5(1). NQS. (2012). National Quality Standard Professional Learning Program. NQS PLP eNewsletter No.37 2012. O’TOOL, J. & BECKETT, D. (2010). Educational Research: Creative Thinking and Doing. Victoria: Oxford University Press. ÖZARSLAN, Y. (2010). Kişiselleştirilmiş Öğrenme Ortamı Olarak IPTV. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri 2010 (International Educational Technology), Oral Presentation, İstanbul. PASSIG, D. & LEVIN, H. (1999). Gender Interest Differences with Multimedia Learning Interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(2), 173-183. PASSIG, D. & LEVIN, H. (2000). Gender Preferences For Multimedia Interfaces. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 64-71. REECE, I. & WALKER, S. (2007). A Practical Guide to Teaching, Training and Learning, Tyne and Wear. (6th edition). Wallingford: Business Education Publishers Ltd, United Kingdom. RYAN, R. M. & DECI, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. SAMPSON, D., KARAGIANNIDIS, C. & KINSHUK (2002). Personalised Learning: Educational, Technological and Standardisation Perspective. Interactive Educational Multimedia, number, 4, 24-39 SCHIEFELE, U. (1992). Topic Interest and Levels of Text Comprehension. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development (pp. 151182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. SCHRAW, G. & LEHMAN, S. (2001). Situational Interest: A Review of the Literature and Direction for Future Research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52, doi: 10.1023/A:1009004801455 SOUTO, M. A. M., REGINA, V. & DE OLIVEIRA, J. P. M. (2006). Modeling Learner’s Cognitive Abilities in the Context of a Web-Based Learning. EnvironmentAdvances in web-based education : personalized learning environments / George D. Magoulas and Sherry Y. Chen, editors. 2nd Chapter. Information Science Publishing, 2006, UK. WARDRIP, P. S., ABRAMOVICH, S., BATHGATE, M. & KIM, Y. J. (2014). A School-Based Badging System and Interest-Based Learning: An exploratory case study. International Journal of Learning and Media, MIT Press. WIGFIELD, A. & ECCLES, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. YILDIRIM, A. ve ŞİMŞEK, H. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Press.