Pamuk Lifi Parametrelerinin ve İşlenebilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Year 2018, Volume: 25 Issue: 111, 182 - 188, 01.10.2018

G. B. Tesema K. Subramanıan

Abstract

Günümüzde, tekstil endüstrisi ticari DP-90 pamuk
genotiplerinin örneklerinin teknolojik değerlerini ölçmek için “SCI” ve “FQI”
olmak üzere iki temel ticari nicelikleme yöntemini kullanmaktadır. Son yıllarda,
araştırmacılar, , ticari pamukların kalitesi ve işlenebilirliği bilgisi vermek
için yetersiz göründükleri tespitiyle bu iki yaygın yöntem üzerine için araştırmalar
sürdürülmektedir. Bu çalışmada, pamuk kalitesi ve işlenebilirliğinin genel
değerlendirilmesinde pamuk elyafının mukavemeti ve uzaması arasındaki ilişkinin
önemini belirlemek üzere deney bir çalışma yapılmıştır. Çalışmadan elde edilen
sonuçlar pamuk lifi uzama özelliğinin pamuk kalitesini ve işlenebilirliğini
öngörmek için kritik önem taşıdığını göstermiştir.

Keywords

Niceleme yöntemleri, Kalite, İşlenebilirlik, Uzama, HVI, CCS

A Study on The Fibre Parameters of Cotton Quality and Processability Evaluation

Abstract

Currently, the textile industry is mainly using the two basic
commercial quantification
methods namely,
SCI
and
FQI to evaluate the technological values of samples of commercial DP-90
cotton
genotypes.
Of late, researchers were investigating that these two widely used cotton
characterization tests as they seem to be insufficient to give quality and processability
information about the commercial cottons.
I this study a modified fiber quality index (MFQI) is formulated for the
studied commercial DP-90 cotton. In the study, experiments
were done to assess the importance of
the association between
tenacity and elongation
of cotton fibres in the overall evaluation of the cotton quality and
processability. The results obtained from the study demonstrated that the cotton fibre elongation property is critically important to
predict
the quality and processability of
cotton
as
well.  The results obtained
show that the combination of HVI and CCS data allows us to predict quite
accurately technological values of cotton fiber properties for commercial
bales.

Keywords

Quantification methods, Quality, Processabiliy, Elongation, HVI, CCS

References

• USTER News bulletin, (1991), “Measurement of the quality characteristics of cotton fibre”, 38, 23-31.
• Hequet, E. F., and B. Kelly,( 2012), “Predicting yarn quality: “An indispensable tool for cotton breeders”, International Cotton Conference, , 57-70, March 21-24,Bremen, Germany.
• Lord, E., (1981), “The Origin and Assessment of Cotton Fibre Maturity”, International Institute for Cotton, Didsbury, Manchester, U.K.
• Ratnam, T.V., Doraisamy, I., Seshadri, S., Rajamanickan, R. and Chellamani, K.P., (1995), “ Norms for the Spinning Mills”. The South Indian Textile Research Association, Coimbatore, India.
• Murthy, H.V. and Samanta, S. K. (2000), “ A Fresh Look at Fiber Quality Index”, The Indian Textile Journal., 111 (3): 29-37.
• Zellweger Uster, (1999), “Application Handbook of Uster HVI Spectrum”, UsterTechnologies AG, Switzerland.
• Backe, E. E., (1996), “The importance of cotton fiber elongation on yarn quality and weaving performance”, Proceedings of the 9th Engineered Fiber Selection System Conference, Cotton Incorporated, Cary, 1–13, NC, USA.
• Benzina, H., E. Hequet, N. Abid, J. Gannaway, J.-Y. Drean and O. Harzallah, (2007), “Using Fiber Elongation to Improve Genetic Screening in Cotton Breeding Programs”; Textile Research Journal Vol 77(10): 770–778.
• E. F. Hequet, S. Baker, C. Turner, B. Kelly, H. Sari-Sarraf, and S. Gordon,(2016) “Breaking the fiber quality ceiling: Limitations of cotton fibers bundle Testing” 33rd International Cotton Conference; March 16-18 Bremen, Germany.
• Hertel, K. L., and Craven, J. C., (1956), "Cotton Fiber Bundle Elongation and Tenacity as Related to Some Fiber and Yarn Properties," Textile R search Journal, 26: 479-84.
• Meredith, R. S., (1946), “The elastic properties of textile fibres”, Journal of the Textile Institute., 37, 10: 469- 480.
• Orr, R. S., and Grant, J. N., (1953), “Cotton”, Textile Research Journal 23: 505-509.
• Platt, M. M., Klein, W. G., and Hamburger, W. J., (1952), “Mechanics of Elastic Performance of Textile Materials”, Textile Research Journal, 22: 641-667.
• Virgin, WP and Wakeham H., (1956), “Cotton quality and fiber properties, part IV”. Textile Research Journal; 26: 177–191.
• Derichs, J., (1986), “ Theoretical and Practical Limits of Rotor Spinning in the Production of Fine Yarns”, Schlafhorst documentation, 1–9, No. 16, a141e-3.86.
• Louis, A. Fiori, Jack E. Sands, Herschel W. Little, and James N. Grant, (1956), “Effect of Cotton Fiber Bundle Break Elongation and Other Fiber Properties on the Properties of a Coarse and a Medium Singles Yarn”; Textile Research Journal; 26 (7): 553–564.
• May, O. L., and Jividen, G. M., (1999), “Genetic Modification of Cotton Fiber Properties as Measured by Single and High Volume Instruments”, Crop Science, 39: 328–333.
• Kugler, G., U.Mörschel, W. Stein, (2012), “Strength testing of cotton by using Textechno FIBROTEST in comparison to HVI 1000”, Spinning Seminar; Denkendorf.
• Tesema, G. B., and Hussein, K.M.M., (2015), “Comparison of different quantification methods to define fiber quality of Ethiopian, Indian & Egyptian cottons” International Journal of Fiber and Textile Research 5 (2): 9-15.
• Koo H.J., and Suh M.W, (1999), “Maximizing Yarn and Fabric Strength through Variance of HVI Elongation”; Textile Research Journal, 69 (6): 447 – 456.