Research Article

Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices

Volume: 31 Number: 3 September 30, 2021
EN

Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices

Abstract

Auxetic materials with a negative Poison’s ratio (PR) have the potential to meet the demand for different materials, especially technical textiles. In the literature, Universal Tensile Test (UTT) devices and various experimental setups developed by researchers have been used in PR measurements. This study aims to investigate the PR of knitted fabrics with UTT and extensometer devices comparatively by using the same measurement parameters according to ASTM E132. Knitted fabrics with zigzag and foldable patterns were produced in the study because of their auxetic behaviour. It has been determined that the extensometer device can be used as an alternative to the UTT device for PR measurements. While the PR of foldable fabrics cannot be measured with the UTT device because of the fabrics' folding on themselves, it has been observed that it can be easily measured with the extensometer device thanks to the horizontal axis principle.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey(TUBITAK-1001)

Project Number

Project No: 219M170

Thanks

The authors would like to thank Uludağ Triko San. ve Tic. A.Ş., Bursa, Turkey for their support during knitting operations.

References

  1. 1. Lim TC. 2015. Auxetic Materials and Structures. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-275-3.
  2. 2. Chen S, Chawla KK, Chawla N. 2019. Handbook of Mechanics of Materials. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3.
  3. 3. Jinyun Z, Yi L, Lam J, et al. 2010. The Poisson Ratio and Modulus of Elastic Knitted Fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 80: 1965–1969.
  4. 4. Miller W, Hook PB, Smith CW, et al. 2009. The manufacture and characterisation of a novel, low modulus, negative Poisson’s ratio composite. Composite Science and Technology, 69: 651–655.
  5. 5. Alderson A, Evans KE. 1995. Microstructural modelling of auxetic microporous polymers. Journal of Materials Science, 30: 3319–3332.
  6. 6. Scarpa F, Patorino P, Garelli A, et al. 2005. Auxetic compliant flexible PU foams: static and dynamic properties. Basic Solid State Physics, 242: 681–694.
  7. 7. Uzun M. 2010. Negatif poi̇sson oranına sahi̇p (Auxetic) malzemeler ve uygulama alanları. Tekstil ve Mühendis, 17: 13–18.
  8. 8. Alderson K, Alderson A, Anand S, et al. 2012. Auxetic warp knit textile structures. Basic Solid State Physics, 249: 1322–1329.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Wearable Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2021

Submission Date

March 12, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 31 Number: 3

APA
Tiritoğlu, M., Tezel, S., & Kavuşturan, Y. (2021). Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices. Textile and Apparel, 31(3), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876
AMA
1.Tiritoğlu M, Tezel S, Kavuşturan Y. Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices. Textile and Apparel. 2021;31(3):203-213. doi:10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876
Chicago
Tiritoğlu, Mehmet, Serkan Tezel, and Yasemin Kavuşturan. 2021. “Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices”. Textile and Apparel 31 (3): 203-13. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876.
EndNote
Tiritoğlu M, Tezel S, Kavuşturan Y (September 1, 2021) Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices. Textile and Apparel 31 3 203–213.
IEEE
[1]M. Tiritoğlu, S. Tezel, and Y. Kavuşturan, “Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices”, Textile and Apparel, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 203–213, Sept. 2021, doi: 10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876.
ISNAD
Tiritoğlu, Mehmet - Tezel, Serkan - Kavuşturan, Yasemin. “Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices”. Textile and Apparel 31/3 (September 1, 2021): 203-213. https://doi.org/10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876.
JAMA
1.Tiritoğlu M, Tezel S, Kavuşturan Y. Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices. Textile and Apparel. 2021;31:203–213.
MLA
Tiritoğlu, Mehmet, et al. “Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices”. Textile and Apparel, vol. 31, no. 3, Sept. 2021, pp. 203-1, doi:10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Tiritoğlu, Serkan Tezel, Yasemin Kavuşturan. Comparison of Poisson’s Ratio Measurement Methods: The Extensometer and the Universal Tensile Testing Devices. Textile and Apparel. 2021 Sep. 1;31(3):203-1. doi:10.32710/tekstilvekonfeksiyon.895876

Cited By

No part of this journal may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated in any forms or by any means without prior written permission of the Editorial Board. The views and opinions expressed here in the articles are those of the authors and are not the views of Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon and Textile and Apparel Research-Application Center.