Trends in 'Technology Leadership' Research in Education: Scoping Review

Year 2022, , 12 - 33, 30.06.2022

Özgen Korkmaz , Asena Özge Kutlu , Şifanur Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1088511

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The rapid development of technology and the effective use of technology in education systems have revealed the concept of technology leadership. In this study, a total of 32 master's and doctoral dissertations on 'technology leadership' published in the National Thesis Center of Turkey (YÖKTEZ) between 2009-2020 were examined. PRISMA (2009) model was preferred in the selection of published thesis studies. This review was carried out using the Scopping Review method of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). In this direction, the scope of the research consisted of 28 master's and 1 doctoral thesis ‘in the field of education and training’, ‘the language of publication is Turkish’, which ‘has the conditions of publication and permission’. Of the examined studies, 26 were conducted using quantitative, 2 qualitative and 1 mixed research method. In the sample distributions in the studies, it is seen that there are 52% teacher participants and 24% administrator participants. When the findings of the studies were examined, it was determined that school administrators' self-efficacy regarding technology leadership, role perceptions and teacher views on technology leadership were the most researched dependent variables. In studies on ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) and NETS-A (National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators) standards, it has been concluded that school administrators are seen as technology leaders. When the literature is examined, it is seen that the studies on technology leadership in education have increased in recent years, but doctoral studies are not sufficient in the general distribution.

Keywords

technology leadership, ISTE-NETS-A standards, school administrator

References

• Ahmadi, M. R. (2018). The use of technology in English language learning: A literature review. International journal of research in english education (IJREE), 3(2), 115–125.
• Akıllı, E. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between the management effectiveness and technological leadership level of school managers according to perceptions of teacher. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, Educational Administration and Supervision, Istanbul.
• Akın-Mart, Ö. & Tulunay-Ateş, Ö. (2021). Investigation of technological leadership of the school administrators in Turkey: A meta-analysis study. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(1), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/buefad.740794
• Aksoy, M. E., & Çobanoğlu, L. (2018). An investigation of the relationship between school administrators’ technology leadership competencies and project submissions. Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(18), 31- 39.
• Anderson, E.R. & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: an empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1(41), 49-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X 04269517.
• Arksey, H. & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
• Aykaç, N. & Ulubey, Ö. (2008). Yaratıcı drama yöntemi ile yapılandırmacılık ilişkisinin 2005 MEB ilköğretim programlarında değerlendirilmesi. [Evaluation of the relationship between creative drama method and constructivism in 2005 MEB primary education programs] Creative Drama Journal, 3(6), 25-44.
• Balaban, N. U. (2012). Assesing the relationship between technology leadership roles and computer anxiety levels of aministrators. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Anadolu University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Eskişehir.
• Baş, E. D. (2012). The relationship between elementary school administrators? technology leadership roles and school climate. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Maltepe University, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
• Baybara, M. (2018). The competencies of private and state elementary school administrators regarding their technology leadership roles (İstanbul city, Bahçelievler district sample) (Unpublished master’s thesis), Sabahatti̇n Zaim Univercity, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Educational Sciences, Department of Education Management, Istanbul.
• Beyaz, G. (2014). Technology leadership attitudes of technical and industrial high school managers. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Zirve University, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Gaziantep.
• Bicen, H., & Demir, B. (2020). A content analysis on articles using augmented reality technology and infographic in education. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, 11. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup1/121
• Borel, D. A., Martin, G., Nicks, R., Mason, D. & Thibodeaux, T. (2019). School Principal Interns’ Perceived Level Of Preparedness For Technology Leadership. Education Leadership Review, 20(1), 101–118.
• Bostan, A. H. & Yapıcı, Ş. (2019). Class Teachers 'Views on The Qualifications and Applications of The Constructive Approach (Konya Province), International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(42): 4499-4520. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1696
• Brunson, M. A. (2015). Technology leadership competencies for elementary principals. Doctoral dissertation, Bowie State University.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademy.
• Büyüktaş Gayır, G. & Özçelik, Z. (2021). 7. Content Analysis Related to the Studies on Leadership and Management in the 7th Organizational Behavior Congress Proceedings Book. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Univercity Social Science Journal, 18(1), 558- 576. doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.743207
• Çakır, Ö. (2020). Techno pedagogical and technology leadership competencies of school administrators. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Fırat University, Institute of Education Sciences, Institute of Education Sciences Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Elazıg.
• Çakır, R. (2012). Technology integration and technology leadership in schools as learning organizations. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 11(4), 273–282.
• Çalık, T., Çoban, Ö. & Özdemir, N. (2019). Examination of the Relationship between School Administrators’ Technological Leadership Self-efficacy and Their Personality Treats. Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Educational Sciences, 52(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.457346
• Can, M. & Namli, N. A. (2019). Attidutes of Pre-Service Teachers’ On Technology Use in Education: Çukurova Unıversity Sample. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 23(1), 95–112.
• Cantürk, G. & Aksu, T. (2017). Technological Leadership Behaviors of School Administrators. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 6(4), 21-38.
• Chang, I. H. (2002). Assessing principals' leadership in implementing educational technology policies: An application of structural equation modeling. University of Missouri-Columbia.
• Demiraçan, A. (2019). Investigation of the relationship between technology leadership strategies and innovation management beliefs of school administrators. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Trakya University Social Sciences Institute, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Edirne.
• Demirsoy, S. (2016). The relationship between technological pedagogical knowledge of teachers and school administrators technological leadership competencies according to teachers' opinions. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University Social Sciences Institute, Department of Educational Sciences, Education Management and Supervision, Istanbul.
• Derbedek, H. (2008). The effect of instructional leadership on elementary school teachers' self efficacy. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Pamukkale University Social Sciences Institute Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Denizli.
• Dexter, S. & Richardson, J. W. (2020). What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1668316
• Dinç, H. (2019). Technology leadership competencies of school principals. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Düzce University Social Sciences Institute, Department of Total Quality Management, Düzce.
• Efeoğlu, C. (2019). The relationship between school managers technology leadership roles with teachers attitudes of education technologies. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Institute of Education Sciences, Educational Administration and Supervision, Çanakkale.
• Eren, E. & Kurt, A. A. (2011). Technology Leadership Behaviours of Elemantary School Principals. Uşak University Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 219-238.
• Esplin, N. L., Stewart, C. & Thurston, T. N. (2018). Technology leadership perceptions of Utah elementary school principals. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1487351
• Gençay, A. (2018). Primary and secondary school administrators’ technology leadership competency: Keçiören township case. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Yıldız Teknik University Social Sciences Institute, Education Management Program, Istanbul.
• Gökoğlu, S. (2014). Evaluation of Technology Integration into Learning Environments by Using System Based Mentoring Model. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Trabzon.
• Göl, E. & Bülbül, T. (2012). The Perceptions of the Teachers Regarding the Innovation Management Effıcacies of the Primary School Administrators. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(2), 97–109. https://doi.Org/10.17860/Efd.35374
• Gölçek, E. (2019). School principals’ subjective meanings and experiences which are related to technological leadership in their schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Yıldız Technical University, Social Sciences Institute Education Management Program, Istanbul.
• Gonzales, M. M. (2020). School technology leadership vision and challenges: perspectives from american school administrators. International Journal Of Educational Management, 34(4), 697–708. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/Ijem-02-2019-0075
• Gültekin, F. (2013). Self efficacy perceptions of Secondar School Administrators in Technology Leadership. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, Educational Administration and Supervision, Istanbul.
• Gürfidan, H. (2017). The Impact Of School Culture, Technology Leadership And Support Services On Teachers’ Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Modeling. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Süleyman Demirel University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Isparta.
• Gürkan, H. (2017). Examinıig The Relationship Between The School Leadership Competencies Of Technology Leadership And The Lifelong Learning Competencies. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University Marmara University Education Management and Supervision Joint Master's Program, Istanbul .
• Gürsel, R. S. (2020). Relationship Between School Administrators' Technology Leadership Competencies and Media and Technology Use and Attitudes. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Graduate School of Education Department of Educational Administration, Istanbul.
• Güven, A. (2015). Technology Leadership Competencies of Directors of Schools Connected to General Directorate of Secondary Education. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Sakarya University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Sakarya.
• Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Dalgıç, G. (2011). School Administrators’ Perceptions of Technology Leadership: An Example for Metaphor Analysis. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 1(1), 97–121.
• Hayytov, D. (2013). The Relationship Between The Adequacy Of School Administration’s Technological Leadership Perceptions And Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Technology. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Gazi University, Institute of Education Sciences, Education Management and Supervision, Ankara.
• Irmak, M. (2015). Primary and Secondary School Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding Directors Level of Technology Leadership. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Pamukkale University, Institute of Education Sciences, Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Denizli.
• ISTE (2018). ISTE standards for education leaders. Retrieved at https://www.iste.org/standards/for-education-leaders Köybaşı, F . (2020). Research on Technology Leadership of the Educational Administrators: A Content Analysis . Journal of Muallim Rıfat Faculty of Education, 2 (1) , 1-15.
• Kurt, İ. (2019). Teacher's views towards technological leadership competencies of high school administrators. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Marmara University Institute of Education Sciences, Education Management and Supervision, Istanbul.
• MEB, (2018). 2023 Vision of Education. Retrieved at http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & PrismaGroup. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematicr eviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
• Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A. A. E., & Aromata-ris, E. Systematic review or scoping review. Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. Med Res Methodol, 20018(18), 1-18.
• Noddings, N. (2017). Philosophy of Education, 3rd. Translate: Raşit Çelik Nobel, Ankara.
• Ölçek, G. (2014). Examining The Views Given By The Principals And Teachers About The Technological Leadership Level Of The Principals Working At Elementary Schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Uşak University, Social Sciences Institute Department of Education Management, Uşak.
• Öznacar, B., Debeş, G., & Yücesoy, Y. (2020) Evaluation of School Administrators 'Views on The Use of Technology In Education: A Content Analysis. International Journal of Society Researches 16(Special Issue of Education and Society), 5508-5523.
• Öztaban, A. (2020). Fulfilment levels of school administrators' technology leadership roles. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Adnan Menderes University Social Sciences Institute Department of Education Management, Aydın.
• Öztaş, A. (2013). Teacher Views On The Roles Of Technology Leadership Of Goverment Secondary Education School Managers. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Marmara University Institute of Education Sciences Department of Education Management, Istanbul.
• Rovshenov, A. (2020). An analysis of research on programming education. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Ege University Institute of Education Sciences, Izmir.
• Şahin, H. (2015). Assessment Of School Administrators Of Technology Leadership Views Regarding The Role Of Principals And Teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Zirve University, Social Sciences Institute Department of Educational Administration Inspection Planning and Economics, Gaziantep.
• Sezer, B. (2011). The Competencies of Elementary School Administrators Regarding Their Technology Leadership Roles. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Ankara University Institute of Education Sciences, Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Ankara.
• Şimşek, Ö., Demir, S., Bağçeci, B. & Kınay, İ. (2013). Examining Technopedagogical Knowledge Competencies of Teacher Trainers in Terms of Some Variables. Ege Education Journal, 14(1), 1-23.
• Sincar, M. (2009). An Analysis of Turkish Elementary School Administrators’ Technology Leadership Roles. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) Inönü University Social Sciences Institute Educational Administration and Supervision, Malatya.
• Tan, S.C. (2010). School technology leadership: Lessons from empirical research. In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic & S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp.896-906).
• Taşdemir, S. (2018). Determination of technology leaders in interactive board installation completed schools within the Fatih Project (Sample of Bolu province). (Unpublished master’s thesis), Sakarya University Institute of Education Sciences, Department of computer and instructional Technologies, Sakarya.
• Teke, S. (2019). An evalaluation of teacher views on school administors' technolojical leadership roles. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Marmara University Institute of Education Sciences, Educational Administration and Supervision, Istanbul.
• Tezel, B. (2020). Examining The Relationship Between The Kind Of Technology Leadership Shown By Managers In Schools And School Success And Teachers' Academic Optimism. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Recep Tayyi̇p Erdoğan University Institute of Education Sciences, Training Management, Supervision, Planning and Economic, Rize.
• Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A. & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.
• Turan, S. (2020). Technological Leadership of School Principals During the Covid-19 Period. Journal of National Education, 49(1), 175-199.
• Ulukaya, F. (2015). The Relationship Between The Self Efficacy Levels About School Directors And The Levels Of Performing Education. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Gaziosmanpaşa University Institute of Education Sciences, Education Management and Supervision Department, Tokat.
• Uzunboylu, H. & Beheshti, M. (2017). An investigation through content analysis in infographics. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7(4), 655-666
• Yalınkılıç, D. (2012). The relationship between leadership behaviors of primary school principals and the organizational culture according to the perceptions of the teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Maltepe University Social Sciences Institute department of educational sciences, Istanbul.
• Yeni, G. (2020). The Effect of 21st Century Skills on School Managers’ Leadership Aspect. International Journal of Leadership Training (IJOLT), 2(II), 19-30.