Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 87 - 98, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1156508

Abstract

References

  • Aksoy, A. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin riskli internet davranışları ve güvenli internet kullanımı hakkında öğrenci ve ebeveyn görüşleri, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Algür, S. & Cengiz, F. (2011). Türk tüketicilere göre online (çevrimiçi) alışverişin riskleri ve yararları, Journal of Yasar University, 22(6), 3666–3680.
  • Arıcak, O. T., Kınay, H., ve Tanrıkulu, T. (2012). Siber zorbalık ölçeğinin ilk psikometrik bulguları. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 101-114.
  • Aslanidou, S., & Menexes, G. (2008). Youth and the internet: uses and practices in the home. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1375-1391.
  • Bacon, M., Blood, L., Ault, M., & Adams, D. (2008). 4Kids. org: topical, searchable, and safe internet-based resource for children and youth. Education Libraries, 31(1), 46-50.
  • Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde miles-huberman modeli, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED) 2017, 3, (1), 1-15.
  • Bilodeau, H., Kehler, A., & Minnema, N. (2021). Internet use and COVID-19: How the pandemic increased the amount of time Canadians spend online. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Statistics Canada= Statistique Canada.
  • Burnukara, P. &Uçanok, Z. (2010). Ergenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanım olanakları ile sanal ortamda meydana gelen zorbalığa ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Dergisi, 21(2), 47-62.
  • Byrne, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90-113.
  • Canbek, G., & Sağıroğlu, Ş. (2007). Çocukların ve gençlerin bilgisayar ve internet güvenliği. Politeknik Dergisi, 10(1), 33-39.
  • Castells, M. (2005). Enformasyon çaği: ekonomi, toplum ve kültür I. cilt/ağ toplumunun yükselişi (Çev.: Ebru Kılıç), İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Creswell JW (2018) Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (Çeviri Ed. M Bütün, SB Demir). Ankara, Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Deng, X., Xu, D., Zeng, M., & Qi, Y. (2019). Does Internet use help reduce rural cropland abandonment? Evidence from China. Land use policy, 89, 104243.
  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffioen, P., & Sinopoli, B. (2021). Assessing risks and modeling threats in the internet of things. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07771.
  • Gündüz, A. (2015). İnternet güvenliği üzerine 2000-2014 yılları arasındaki çalışmaların bir içerik analizi: riskler, risklere etki eden faktörler ve metodolojik yönelimler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
  • Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937-3954.
  • Karaca, M. (2007). Sosyolojik bir olgu olarak internet gençliği: Elazığ örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Khurana, A., Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., & Romer, D. (2015). The protective effects of parental monitoring and internet restriction on adolescents’ risk of online harassment. Journal of youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1039-1047.
  • Latkovikj, M. T., & Popovska, M. B. (2019). Online research about online research: advantages and disadvantages. E-methodology, 6(6), 44-56.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2013). Children, internet and risk in comparative perspective. Journal of Children And Media, 7(1), 1-8.
  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2010). Risks and safety on the internet. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.
  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., & Staksrud, E. (2013). Risky social networking practices among “underage” users: lessons for evidence-based policy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 303-320.
  • Matthews, K., Nazroo, J., & Marshall, A. (2019). Digital inclusion in later life: cohort changes in internet use over a ten-year period in England. Ageing & Society, 39(9), 1914-1932.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013) Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber (Çeviri Ed. S Turan). Ankara, Nobel Akademi.
  • Odabaşı, F., Çoklar, A. N., Kabakçı, I. (2007). Yeni Dünya: İnternet-Ailelerin Yeni Dünyadaki Sorumlulukları Nelerdir? 8. Aybastı-Kabataş Kurultayı, 1-10.
  • Ogur, B., Yılmaz, R. M., Göktaş, Y. (2017). An examination of secondary school students’ habits of using internet. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(3), 421.
  • Okyere, C. Y. (2022). The effect of internet services on child education outcomes: evidence from poa! Internet in Kenya. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 14(1), 4-18.
  • Padır, M. A., Eroğlu, Y. & Çalışkan, M. (2015). The investigation of relationships between subjective happiness, cyber bullying, and cyber victimization in adolescents. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying, 2(1), 32-51.
  • Recalde-Viana, M. Sádaba-Chalezquer, C. Gutiérrez-García, E. (2015). Telecommunications industry contributions to child online protection/aportaciones del sector de telecomunicaciones a la protección en línea del menor. Comunicar, 23(45), 179.
  • Salman Yıkmış, M. (2020). Nitel araştirmalarda e-görüşme tekniği. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22 (1), 183-197.
  • Topçu, Ç., Yıldırım, A., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2013). Cyber bullying@ schools: what do turkish adolescents think? International Journal For The Advancement Of Counselling, 35(2), 139-151.
  • Toraman, L. & Usta, E. (2018). A qualitative study on the problems encountered by secondary school students on the net. Participatory Educational Research, 5 (2), 80-94. doi: 10.17275/per.18.13.5.2
  • Usta, E. (2017). University students’ views about their cyberbullying behaviors and self-exposition. J. Educ. Sci. 8(22), 70–71 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577247.pdf
  • Walrave, M., Lenaerts, S., & De Moor, S. (2008). Cyberteens@ risk? tieners verknocht aan internet. Maar Ook Waakzaam Voor Risico’s.
  • Wan, X., Lighthall, N. R., & Paulson, D. (2022). Subjective markers of successful aging and change in internet use among older adults: The distinctive role of subjective health. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107064.
  • We Are Social (2021). Global internet usages. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates.
  • Yıldırım, A. (2014). İnternetin görünen yüzü. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (3), 51-59.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayinevi.
  • Yuhanna, I., Alexander, A., & Kachik, A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 1(2), 13-19.
  • Zırhlıoğlu, G. (2011). İnternet bağımlılığının CHAID analizi ile incelenmesi: Van İli Örneği. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 2(4), 182- 190.

Determining The Internet Risk Awareness of The Parents

Year 2022, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 87 - 98, 31.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1156508

Abstract

With the rapid developments in science and technology, today's age has begun to be called the "technology age". With the rapid development of technology, technological devices and innovations have started to take an important place in people's lives in this age. So much so that most innovations have now become a way of life, a way of life for individuals. Undoubtedly, one of the innovations that has become a way of life for people and that has affected their lives to such a great extent has been the "Internet", which enables communication through technological devices. Internet, personal computers, phones, tablets, etc. emerges as a communication network that provides global communication with smart technological devices. Although the Internet has introduced many innovations into our lives, it also contains some risks. This research was carried out to determine the internet risk awareness of parents. For this purpose, the interview form was used. In addition to the questions revealing the descriptive characteristics of the parents in the form, there are questions about whether there are problems encountered in the internet environment and what measures are taken for the problems encountered. In this direction, 20 parents of students studying at a private college in Konya were interviewed. Qualitative research method was used to analyze the obtained data. In the study in which content analysis was used, it was determined that all of the parents used smart phones and used the internet for less than 3 hours a day. In addition, it was concluded that the majority of parents have social media accounts. In the research, it has been determined that not all of the parents have encountered any health-related problems on the internet, but some parents have encountered problems in the social media usage process, communication, banking and trade areas on the internet. In the research, it was determined that the parents resorted to security measures such as "uninstalling the application on the phone, not accepting notifications from unknown accounts, applying to cyber security, keeping privacy settings up-to-date, blocking the person, changing the password" for the problems they encountered during the social media usage process. In the research, it has been determined that the parents who encounter problems with communication on the internet resort to "blocking uncontrolled advertisements, blocking offers from unknown accounts, keeping information safe and not accepting messages from unknown accounts". In the research, it has been determined that the parents who encounter problems with banking transactions on the internet resort to security measures such as "contacting the bank, installing a virus program on their phone, taking other measures regarding banking transactions, and calling the bank by not entering their account". Finally, in the research, it has been determined that the parents who encounter problems related to commerce or shopping transactions on the internet resort to security measures such as "complaining to the authorities about the problem, choosing reliable sites, checking whether the sites are 3D reliable, and switching to virtual card application".

References

  • Aksoy, A. (2019). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin riskli internet davranışları ve güvenli internet kullanımı hakkında öğrenci ve ebeveyn görüşleri, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Algür, S. & Cengiz, F. (2011). Türk tüketicilere göre online (çevrimiçi) alışverişin riskleri ve yararları, Journal of Yasar University, 22(6), 3666–3680.
  • Arıcak, O. T., Kınay, H., ve Tanrıkulu, T. (2012). Siber zorbalık ölçeğinin ilk psikometrik bulguları. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 101-114.
  • Aslanidou, S., & Menexes, G. (2008). Youth and the internet: uses and practices in the home. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1375-1391.
  • Bacon, M., Blood, L., Ault, M., & Adams, D. (2008). 4Kids. org: topical, searchable, and safe internet-based resource for children and youth. Education Libraries, 31(1), 46-50.
  • Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde miles-huberman modeli, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED) 2017, 3, (1), 1-15.
  • Bilodeau, H., Kehler, A., & Minnema, N. (2021). Internet use and COVID-19: How the pandemic increased the amount of time Canadians spend online. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Statistics Canada= Statistique Canada.
  • Burnukara, P. &Uçanok, Z. (2010). Ergenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri kullanım olanakları ile sanal ortamda meydana gelen zorbalığa ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet Dergisi, 21(2), 47-62.
  • Byrne, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55(1), 90-113.
  • Canbek, G., & Sağıroğlu, Ş. (2007). Çocukların ve gençlerin bilgisayar ve internet güvenliği. Politeknik Dergisi, 10(1), 33-39.
  • Castells, M. (2005). Enformasyon çaği: ekonomi, toplum ve kültür I. cilt/ağ toplumunun yükselişi (Çev.: Ebru Kılıç), İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Creswell JW (2018) Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni (Çeviri Ed. M Bütün, SB Demir). Ankara, Siyasal Kitabevi.
  • Deng, X., Xu, D., Zeng, M., & Qi, Y. (2019). Does Internet use help reduce rural cropland abandonment? Evidence from China. Land use policy, 89, 104243.
  • Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffioen, P., & Sinopoli, B. (2021). Assessing risks and modeling threats in the internet of things. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.07771.
  • Gündüz, A. (2015). İnternet güvenliği üzerine 2000-2014 yılları arasındaki çalışmaların bir içerik analizi: riskler, risklere etki eden faktörler ve metodolojik yönelimler. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzurum.
  • Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). A review of Internet use among older adults. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937-3954.
  • Karaca, M. (2007). Sosyolojik bir olgu olarak internet gençliği: Elazığ örneği. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Elazığ.
  • Khurana, A., Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., & Romer, D. (2015). The protective effects of parental monitoring and internet restriction on adolescents’ risk of online harassment. Journal of youth and Adolescence, 44(5), 1039-1047.
  • Latkovikj, M. T., & Popovska, M. B. (2019). Online research about online research: advantages and disadvantages. E-methodology, 6(6), 44-56.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2013). Children, internet and risk in comparative perspective. Journal of Children And Media, 7(1), 1-8.
  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2010). Risks and safety on the internet. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.
  • Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., & Staksrud, E. (2013). Risky social networking practices among “underage” users: lessons for evidence-based policy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 303-320.
  • Matthews, K., Nazroo, J., & Marshall, A. (2019). Digital inclusion in later life: cohort changes in internet use over a ten-year period in England. Ageing & Society, 39(9), 1914-1932.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013) Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber (Çeviri Ed. S Turan). Ankara, Nobel Akademi.
  • Odabaşı, F., Çoklar, A. N., Kabakçı, I. (2007). Yeni Dünya: İnternet-Ailelerin Yeni Dünyadaki Sorumlulukları Nelerdir? 8. Aybastı-Kabataş Kurultayı, 1-10.
  • Ogur, B., Yılmaz, R. M., Göktaş, Y. (2017). An examination of secondary school students’ habits of using internet. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(3), 421.
  • Okyere, C. Y. (2022). The effect of internet services on child education outcomes: evidence from poa! Internet in Kenya. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 14(1), 4-18.
  • Padır, M. A., Eroğlu, Y. & Çalışkan, M. (2015). The investigation of relationships between subjective happiness, cyber bullying, and cyber victimization in adolescents. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying, 2(1), 32-51.
  • Recalde-Viana, M. Sádaba-Chalezquer, C. Gutiérrez-García, E. (2015). Telecommunications industry contributions to child online protection/aportaciones del sector de telecomunicaciones a la protección en línea del menor. Comunicar, 23(45), 179.
  • Salman Yıkmış, M. (2020). Nitel araştirmalarda e-görüşme tekniği. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22 (1), 183-197.
  • Topçu, Ç., Yıldırım, A., & Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2013). Cyber bullying@ schools: what do turkish adolescents think? International Journal For The Advancement Of Counselling, 35(2), 139-151.
  • Toraman, L. & Usta, E. (2018). A qualitative study on the problems encountered by secondary school students on the net. Participatory Educational Research, 5 (2), 80-94. doi: 10.17275/per.18.13.5.2
  • Usta, E. (2017). University students’ views about their cyberbullying behaviors and self-exposition. J. Educ. Sci. 8(22), 70–71 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED577247.pdf
  • Walrave, M., Lenaerts, S., & De Moor, S. (2008). Cyberteens@ risk? tieners verknocht aan internet. Maar Ook Waakzaam Voor Risico’s.
  • Wan, X., Lighthall, N. R., & Paulson, D. (2022). Subjective markers of successful aging and change in internet use among older adults: The distinctive role of subjective health. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107064.
  • We Are Social (2021). Global internet usages. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates.
  • Yıldırım, A. (2014). İnternetin görünen yüzü. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (3), 51-59.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayinevi.
  • Yuhanna, I., Alexander, A., & Kachik, A. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online learning. Journal Educational Verkenning, 1(2), 13-19.
  • Zırhlıoğlu, G. (2011). İnternet bağımlılığının CHAID analizi ile incelenmesi: Van İli Örneği. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 2(4), 182- 190.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Fatmanur Betül Uçar 0000-0002-0155-0034

Ahmet Naci Çoklar 0000-0001-9210-4779

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Acceptance Date November 8, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Uçar, F. B., & Çoklar, A. N. (2022). Determining The Internet Risk Awareness of The Parents. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1156508

2617220107