Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi

Year 2023, , 25 - 50, 31.01.2023

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu

https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651

Abstract

Avrupa Birliği’nin Küresel Stratejisi, “stratejik düşünce” ile Ortak Dış ve Güvenlik Politikasının (ODGP) önceliklerini ortaya koyarken, “ortak eylem” ile de Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikasının (OGSP) faaliyet alanını genişletmiştir. Dolayısıyla, çalışmanın amacı, stratejik düşünceden ortak eyleme giden Küresel Stratejinin OGSP’nin içeriğini nasıl derinleştirdiğini araştırmak ve bu değişikliğin AB’nin siyasi bütünleşme süreci içindeki yerini Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi üzerinden sorgulamaktır. Nitel araştırma metodunu kullanan bu çalışma, nitel veri toplama yöntemlerinden doküman analizini kullanmıştır. Tümevarım yöntemiyle OGSP konusunda bütüncül bir yapı ortaya koymaya çalışan bu araştırma makalesi, ODGP’nin yeni özelliklerini ortaya koyarken, OGSP’nin Avrupa bütünleşmesi içindeki yerini yeniden tanımlamıştır. Sonuç olarak, Küresel Strateji ile AB üye devletleri arasında güvenlik ve savunma konularında yakınlaşma sağlanmış ve OGSP, artan askeri unsurlarla etkinlik kazanmaya başlamıştır.

Keywords

Avrupa Birliği Küresel Strateji ODGP OGSP Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi

References

  • Barbé, E. and Morillas P. (2019). The EU global strategy: The dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(6), 753-770.
  • Bargués, P. and Morillas P. (2021). From democratization to fostering resilience: EU intervention and the challenges of building institutions, social trust, and legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, 28(7), 1319-1337.
  • Biscop, S. (2021). Analysing the EU global strategy on foreign and security policy. In J. Rehrl (Ed.), Handbook on CSDP, the common security and defence policy of the European Union, (pp. 29-36). Vienna: Publication of the Federal Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Austria.
  • Biscop, S. (2016). The EU global strategy: realpolitik with European characteristics. In J. Woischnik (Ed.), Might and right in world politics, (pp. 91-97). Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  • Boșilcăa, R., Stenbergb, M. and Riddervold, M. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: the case of EUNAVFOR MED operation Sophia. European Security, 30(2), 218-236.
  • Cross, M. and Davis, K. (2016). The EU global strategy and diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 402-413.
  • Csornai, Z. (2017). Evaluating the effects of Brexit on the EU’s common security and defence policy. KKI Policy Brief, 14, 1-12.
  • Duke, S. W. (2019). The competing logics of EU security and defence. Survival, Global Politics and Strategy, 61(2), 123-142.
  • European External Action Service. (2016). Implementation plan on security and defence. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2016). Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2017). From shared vision to common action: implementing the EU global strategy, year 1. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs-report-full_brochure_year_1.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2018). Implementing the EU global strategy, year 2. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_annual_report_year_2.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2019). The European Union’s global strategy, three years on, looking forward. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_global_strategy_2019.pdf.
  • Giusti, S. (2020). The European Union global strategy and the EU’s maieutic role. JCMS, 58(6), 1452-1468.
  • Hage, F. M. (2020). Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: the effect of supranational agenda-setters. European Union Politics, 21(4), 634-656.
  • Helwig, N. (2018). New tasks for EU-NATO cooperation: an inclusive EU defence policy requires close collaboration with NATO. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 4, 1-4.
  • Higgott, R. and Van Langenhove, L. (2016). Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations: an initial, critical but constructive analysis. Policy Paper, Institute for European Studies, 1, 1-16.
  • Joseph, J. and Juncos, E. A. (2020). A promise not fulfilled: the (non) implementation of the resilience turn in EU peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 287-310.
  • Juncos, E. A. (2017). Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European Security, 26(1), 1-18.
  • Kenealy, D. (2019). The EU’s foreign, security and defence policies in an unstable world. In K. Hughes (Ed.), The future of Europe: disruption, continuity and change, [pp. 123-128]. Edinburgh: Scottish Centre on European Studies, UK.
  • Koppa, E. M. (2019). The relationship between CSDP and NATO after Brexit and the EU global strategy. FEPS Studies, April, 1-29.
  • Korosteleva, E. A. and Flockhart, T. (2020). Resilience in EU and international institutions: redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 153-175.
  • Korosteleva, E. A. (2020). Reclaiming resilience back: a local turn in EU external governance. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 241-262.
  • Leuprecht, C. (2019). New opportunities in common security and defence policy: joining PESCO. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 11(3), 76-96.
  • Lucia, E. L. (2017). Performing EU agency by experimenting the ‘comprehensive approach’: the European Union Sahel strategy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35(4), 451-468.
  • Petrova, I. and Delcour, L. (2020). From principle to practice? The resilience–local ownership nexus in the EU eastern partnership policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 336-360.
  • Reykers, Yf. (2017). EU battlegroups: high costs, no benefits. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(3), 457-470.
  • Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the common security and defence policy. European Security, 27(2), 119-137.
  • Tocci, N. (2017). From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: explaining the journey. International Politics, 54(2), 487-502.
  • Tocci, N. (2016). The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 461-472.
  • Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European security and defence union: was 2017 a watershed? JCMS, 56, 131-141.

Year 2023, , 25 - 50, 31.01.2023

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu

https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651

Abstract

While the European Union's Global Strategy revealed the priorities of the "strategic thinking" and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), it expanded the scope of the Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) with "joint action". Therefore, the aim of the study is to investigate how the Global Strategy, which goes from strategic thinking to joint action, deepens the content of the CSDP and to question the place of this change in the EU's political integration process through European Defense Integration. Using the qualitative research method, this study used document analysis, one of the qualitative data collection methods. This research article, which tries to reveal a holistic structure on CFSP with the inductive method, redefines the place of CSDP in European integration, while revealing the new features of CFSP that emerged according to the differentiating dynamics of the global system shaped by crises. As a result, a convergence was achieved between the Global Strategy and EU member states on security and defense issues, and the CSDP began to gain effectiveness with increasing military elements.

Keywords

European Union Global Strategy CFSP CSDP European Defense Integration

References

  • Barbé, E. and Morillas P. (2019). The EU global strategy: The dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(6), 753-770.
  • Bargués, P. and Morillas P. (2021). From democratization to fostering resilience: EU intervention and the challenges of building institutions, social trust, and legitimacy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Democratization, 28(7), 1319-1337.
  • Biscop, S. (2021). Analysing the EU global strategy on foreign and security policy. In J. Rehrl (Ed.), Handbook on CSDP, the common security and defence policy of the European Union, (pp. 29-36). Vienna: Publication of the Federal Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Austria.
  • Biscop, S. (2016). The EU global strategy: realpolitik with European characteristics. In J. Woischnik (Ed.), Might and right in world politics, (pp. 91-97). Rio de Janeiro: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  • Boșilcăa, R., Stenbergb, M. and Riddervold, M. (2021). Copying in EU security and defence policies: the case of EUNAVFOR MED operation Sophia. European Security, 30(2), 218-236.
  • Cross, M. and Davis, K. (2016). The EU global strategy and diplomacy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 402-413.
  • Csornai, Z. (2017). Evaluating the effects of Brexit on the EU’s common security and defence policy. KKI Policy Brief, 14, 1-12.
  • Duke, S. W. (2019). The competing logics of EU security and defence. Survival, Global Politics and Strategy, 61(2), 123-142.
  • European External Action Service. (2016). Implementation plan on security and defence. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_implementation_plan_st14392.en16_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2016). Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe, a global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2017). From shared vision to common action: implementing the EU global strategy, year 1. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs-report-full_brochure_year_1.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2018). Implementing the EU global strategy, year 2. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_annual_report_year_2.pdf.
  • European External Action Service. (2019). The European Union’s global strategy, three years on, looking forward. Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2021, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_global_strategy_2019.pdf.
  • Giusti, S. (2020). The European Union global strategy and the EU’s maieutic role. JCMS, 58(6), 1452-1468.
  • Hage, F. M. (2020). Allocating political attention in the EU’s foreign and security policy: the effect of supranational agenda-setters. European Union Politics, 21(4), 634-656.
  • Helwig, N. (2018). New tasks for EU-NATO cooperation: an inclusive EU defence policy requires close collaboration with NATO. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 4, 1-4.
  • Higgott, R. and Van Langenhove, L. (2016). Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations: an initial, critical but constructive analysis. Policy Paper, Institute for European Studies, 1, 1-16.
  • Joseph, J. and Juncos, E. A. (2020). A promise not fulfilled: the (non) implementation of the resilience turn in EU peacebuilding. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 287-310.
  • Juncos, E. A. (2017). Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European Security, 26(1), 1-18.
  • Kenealy, D. (2019). The EU’s foreign, security and defence policies in an unstable world. In K. Hughes (Ed.), The future of Europe: disruption, continuity and change, [pp. 123-128]. Edinburgh: Scottish Centre on European Studies, UK.
  • Koppa, E. M. (2019). The relationship between CSDP and NATO after Brexit and the EU global strategy. FEPS Studies, April, 1-29.
  • Korosteleva, E. A. and Flockhart, T. (2020). Resilience in EU and international institutions: redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 153-175.
  • Korosteleva, E. A. (2020). Reclaiming resilience back: a local turn in EU external governance. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 241-262.
  • Leuprecht, C. (2019). New opportunities in common security and defence policy: joining PESCO. Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies, 11(3), 76-96.
  • Lucia, E. L. (2017). Performing EU agency by experimenting the ‘comprehensive approach’: the European Union Sahel strategy. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 35(4), 451-468.
  • Petrova, I. and Delcour, L. (2020). From principle to practice? The resilience–local ownership nexus in the EU eastern partnership policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 336-360.
  • Reykers, Yf. (2017). EU battlegroups: high costs, no benefits. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(3), 457-470.
  • Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the common security and defence policy. European Security, 27(2), 119-137.
  • Tocci, N. (2017). From the European security strategy to the EU global strategy: explaining the journey. International Politics, 54(2), 487-502.
  • Tocci, N. (2016). The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 461-472.
  • Tocci, N. (2018). Towards a European security and defence union: was 2017 a watershed? JCMS, 56, 131-141.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Political Science, International Relations
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gökhan Akşemsettinoğlu This is me 0000-0002-6990-6834

Publication Date January 31, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Akşemsettinoğlu, G. (2023). Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, 10(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651
AMA Akşemsettinoğlu G. Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. January 2023;10(1):25-50. doi:10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651
Chicago Akşemsettinoğlu, Gökhan. “Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik Ve Savunma Politikası Ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 10, no. 1 (January 2023): 25-50. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651.
EndNote Akşemsettinoğlu G (January 1, 2023) Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 10 1 25–50.
IEEE G. Akşemsettinoğlu, “Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi”, TESAM Akademi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–50, 2023, doi: 10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651.
ISNAD Akşemsettinoğlu, Gökhan. “Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik Ve Savunma Politikası Ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi 10/1 (January 2023), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651.
JAMA Akşemsettinoğlu G. Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2023;10:25–50.
MLA Akşemsettinoğlu, Gökhan. “Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik Ve Savunma Politikası Ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi”. TESAM Akademi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 1, 2023, pp. 25-50, doi:10.30626/tesamakademi.1245651.
Vancouver Akşemsettinoğlu G. Stratejik Düşünceden Ortak Eyleme AB’nin Ortak Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası ve Avrupa Savunma Bütünleşmesi. TESAM Akademi Dergisi. 2023;10(1):25-50.