Conference Paper

EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT

Volume: 1 Number: 2 November 3, 2015
Ahmet Battal
EN TR

EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT

Abstract

The term “ihtira” has no correspondence in today’s Turkish language, which actually means innovation and being first in the works, as a product of human will in intellectual property law. Replaced by another term ‘buluş’ meaning invention in English, the term ‘buluş’ becomes to be used only for innovations that can be documented as patent and utility model registration document after a while, due to its shallow meaning and its lack of use. While some other things subject to intellectual property do not include any ‘buluş’ in today’s language, they do include ‘ihtira’ because of being a product of human will and hence having a special bond with their owner. For example, industrial models are mostly products of designer’s innovation (ihtira). For example, some trademarks and especially some slogan trademarks are products of innovation (ihtira). For example originality in some literary works are products of innovation (ihtira). For example, this paper is a first with its subject hence it is a product of innovation (ihtira). As a result, what are the consequences of innovatory nature?In this paper, intangible assets subject to intellectual property rights will be examined in terms of the term ‘ihtira’ (innovation) and legal consequences of innovatory nature of intellectual property rights worth protection will be discussed through various examples

Keywords

innovation, innovatory element in trademark, innovatory trademarks, trademarks with the nature of innovation products

References

  1. No references found
APA
Battal, A. (2015). EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT. Ticaret Ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi, 1(2), 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU
AMA
1.Battal A. EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi. 2015;1(2):1-6. https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU
Chicago
Battal, Ahmet. 2015. “EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT”. Ticaret Ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 1 (2): 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU.
EndNote
Battal A (November 1, 2015) EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 1 2 1–6.
IEEE
[1]A. Battal, “EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT”, Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–6, Nov. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU
ISNAD
Battal, Ahmet. “EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT”. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi 1/2 (November 1, 2015): 1-6. https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU.
JAMA
1.Battal A. EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi. 2015;1:1–6.
MLA
Battal, Ahmet. “EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT”. Ticaret Ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 2, Nov. 2015, pp. 1-6, https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Battal. EXAMINATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGTHS IN TERMS OF INNOVATORY ELEMENT. Ticaret ve Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku Dergisi [Internet]. 2015 Nov. 1;1(2):1-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA85BW23AU