Optimum insulation thickness for external building walls for different climate zone in India

Abstract

The current study used degree-day method to determine the optimum insulation thickness for different insulation materials. Some of the commonly used insulation materials available in the market are considered in the study. Materials used in the study are, fiberglass rigid, urethane rigid, fiberglass urethane, perlite, and extruded polystyrene. The cooling degree days were calculated using the base temperature varies from 18ºC to 26ºC for the four major cities like Mumbai, New Delhi, Kolkata, and Chennai of India. The study aims to analyze the effect of the number of cooling degree days and base temperature on insulation thickness and also determine the variation of annual cooling cost with the insulation thickness. The result shows that the optimum insulation thickness varies with the cooling degree days and is also influenced by the electricity rate and the cost of insulation material. Based on the result, it is found that optimum insulation thickness is affected by the thermal conductivity of the material, base temperature, CDD, material cost, and fuel cost. The result shows best suitable insulation materials for Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, and Chennai are urethane rigid, fiberglass urethane, urethane rigid, and fiberglass rigid respectively. The optimum insulation thicknesses vary between 1 and 12 cm for the different base temperatures and cities. Annual cooling cost per m2 is calculated for the base temperature 21 ºC and 24 ºC, and the result shows that fiberglass urethane has the lowest annual cooling cost for different cities. Energy-saving varies with the thickness of the insulating materials apply on the wall. In addition with the help of insulation, energy can be saved up to 80% and achieve energy-efficient buildings.

Keywords

• Annual Cooling Cost
• Base Temperature
• Cooling Degree Days
• Energy-Saving
• Optimum Insulation Thickness

References

1. [1] International Energy Agency (IEA). 2018 Global Status Report. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/2018-global-status-report#overview. Accessed Aug 7, 2024.
2. [2] Shahid M, Karimi MN. Optimization of energy transmittance through building envelope for hot dry climate. J Therm Engineer 2022;8:595–605. [CrossRef]
3. [3] Durmayaz A, Kadioglu M, Sen Z. An application of the degree-hours method to estimate the residential heating energy requirement and fuel consumption in Istanbul. Energy 2000;25:1245–1256.
4. [4] Buyukalaca O, Bulut H, Yilmaz T. Analysis of variable-base heating and cooling degree-days for Turkey. Appl Energy 2001;69:269–283. [CrossRef]
5. [5] Granja AD, Labaki LC. Influence of external surface color on the periodic heat flow through a flat solid roof with variable thermal resistance. Int J Energy Res 2003;27:771–779. [CrossRef]
6. [6] Kaynakli O. A review of the economical and optimum thermal insulation thickness for building applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16:415–425. [CrossRef]
7. [7] Aditya L, Mahlia TMI, Rismanchi B, Ng HM, Hasan MH, Metselaar HSC, et al. A review on insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;73:1352–1365. [CrossRef]
8. [8] Zedan MF, Mujahid AM. An efficient solution for heat transfers in composite walls with periodic ambient temperature and solar radiation. Int J Ambient Energy 1993;14:83–98. [CrossRef]

9. [9] Al-Obaidi AR. Investigation of fluid field analysis, characteristics of pressure drop and improvement of heat transfer in three-dimensional circular corrugated pipes. J Energy Storage 2019;26:101012. [CrossRef]
10. [10] Al-Obaidi AR, Sharif A. Investigation of the three-dimensional structure, pressure drop, and heat transfer characteristics of the thermohydraulic flow in a circular pipe with different twisted-tape geometrical configurations. J Therm Anal Calorim 2021;143:3533–3558. [CrossRef]
11. [11] Al-Obaidi AR. Analysis of the flow field, thermal performance, and heat transfer augmentation in circular tube using different dimple geometrical configurations with internal twisted-tape insert. Heat Transf 2020;49:4153–4172. [CrossRef]
12. [12] Al-Obaidi AR, Alhamid J. Numerical investigation of fluid flow, characteristics of thermal performance and enhancement of heat transfer of corrugated pipes with various configurations. J Phys Conf Ser 2021;1733:012004. [CrossRef]
13. [13] Al-Obaidi AR. Study the influence of concavity shapes on augmentation of heat-transfer performance, pressure field, and fluid pattern in three-dimensional pipe. Heat Transf 2021;50:43544381.
14. [14] Al-Obaidi AR. Investigation of the flow, pressure drop characteristics, and augmentation of heat performance in a 3D flow pipe based on different inserts of twisted tape configurations. Heat Transf 2021;50:50495079. [CrossRef]
15. [15] Al-Obaidi AR, Chaer I. Study of the flow characteristics, pressure drop and augmentation of heat performance in a horizontal pipe with and without twisted tape inserts. Case Stud Therm Eng 2021;25:100964. [CrossRef]
16. [16] Alhamid J, Al-Obaidi AR. Effect of concavity configuration parameters on hydrodynamic and thermal performance in 3D circular pipe using Al2O3 nanofluid based on CFD simulation. J Phys Conf Ser 2021;1845:012060. [CrossRef]
17. [17] Alhamid J, Al-Obaidi RA. Flow pattern investigation and thermohydraulic performance enhancement in three-dimensional circular pipe under varying corrugation configurations. J Phys Conf Ser 2021;1845:012061. [CrossRef]
18. [18] Al-Obaidi AR, Alhamid J, Hamad F. Flow felid and heat transfer enhancement investigations by using a combination of corrugated tubes with a twisted tape within 3D circular tube based on different dimple configurations. Heat Transf 2021;50:6868–6885. [CrossRef]
19. [19] Al-Obaidi AR, Alhamid J. Investigation of flow pattern, thermohydraulic performance and heat transfer improvement in 3D corrugated circular pipe under varying structure configuration parameters with development different correlations. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 2021;126:105394. [CrossRef]
20. [20] Al-Obaidi AR. Investigation on effects of varying geometrical configurations on thermal hydraulics flow in a 3D corrugated pipe. Int J Therm Sci 2022;171:107237. [CrossRef]
21. [21] Alola AA, Bekun FV, Sarkodie SA. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Sci Total Environ 2019;685:702–709. [CrossRef]
22. [22] Alola AA, Saint Akadiri S, Akadiri AC, Alola UV, Fatigun AS. Cooling and heating degree days in the US: The role of macroeconomic variables and its impact on environmental sustainability. Sci Total Environ 2019;695:133832. [CrossRef]
23. [23] Saint Akadiri S, Alola AA, Alola UV, Nwambe CS. The role of ecological footprint and the changes in degree days on environmental sustainability in the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2020;27:24929–24938. [CrossRef]
24. [24] Spinoni J, Vogt JV, Barbosa P, Dosio A, McCormick N, Bigano A, et al. Changes of heating and cooling degree-days in Europe from 1981 to 2100. Int J Climatol 2018;38:e191–208. [CrossRef]
25. [25] Al-Hadhrami LM. Comprehensive review of cooling and heating degree days characteristics over Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;27:305–314. [CrossRef]
26. [26] Moazami A, Nik VM, Carlucci S, Geving S. Impacts of future weather data typology on building energy performance – Investigating long-term patterns of climate change and extreme weather conditions. Appl Energy 2019;238:696–720. [CrossRef]
27. [27] Moreci E, Ciulla G, Lo Brano V. Annual heating energy requirements of office buildings in a European climate. Sustain Cities Soc 2016;20:8195. [CrossRef]
28. [28] Christenson M, Manz H, Gyalistras D. Climate warming impact on degree-days and building energy demand in Switzerland. Energy Conver Manage 2006;47:671–686. [CrossRef]
29. [29] Zinzi M, Carnielo E, Mattoni B. On the relation between urban climate and energy performance of buildings. A three-years experience in Rome, Italy. Appl Energy 2018;221:148–160. [CrossRef]
30. [30] Ramon D, Allacker K, De Troyer F, Wouters H, van Lipzig NP. Future heating and cooling degree days for Belgium under a high-end climate change scenario. Energy Build 2020;216:109935. [CrossRef]
31. [31] D'Amico A, Ciulla G, Panno D, Ferrari S. Building energy demand assessment through heating degree days: The importance of a climatic dataset. Appl Energy 2019;242:1285–1306. [CrossRef]
32. [32] Mohsen MS, Akash BA. Some prospects of energy savings in buildings. Energy Conver Manage 2001;42:1307–1315. [CrossRef]
33. [33] Jaber JO. Prospects of energy savings in residential space heating. Energy Buildings 2002;34:311–319. [CrossRef]
34. [34] Al-Sallal KA. Comparison between polystyrene and fiberglass roof insulation in warm and cold climates. Renew Energy 2003;28:603–611. [CrossRef]
35. [35] Comakli K, Yuksel B. Optimum insulation thickness of external walls for energy saving. Appl Therm Engineer 2003;23:473–479. [CrossRef]
36. [36] Bolatturk A. Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls with respect to various fuels and climate zones in Turkey. Appl Therm Engineer 2006;26:1301–1309. [CrossRef]
37. [37] Bademlioglu AH, Canbolat AS, Turkan B, Kaynakli O. Investigation of optimum thermal insulation thickness depending on solar radiation and wall directions. 4th Anatolian Energy Symposium with International Participation; 2018. pp. 2156–2164.
38. [38] Cay Y, Gurel AE. Determination of optimum insulation thickness, energy savings, and environmental impact for different climatic regions of Turkey. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2012;32:365–372. [CrossRef]
39. [39] Kurekci NA. Determination of optimum insulation thickness for building walls by using heating and cooling degree-day values of all Turkey’s provincial centers. Energy Build 2016;118:197–213. [CrossRef]
40. [40] Dombayci OA, Atalay O, Acar SG, Ulu EY, Ozturk HK. Thermoeconomic method for determination of optimum insulation thickness of external walls for the houses: Case study for Turkey. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2017;22:1–8. [CrossRef]
41. [41] Pinak R, Geeta B. Estimation of power generation from solid waste generated in sub-urban area using spatial techniques: A case study for Pune City, India. Int J Geomatics Geosci 2011;2:179187. [CrossRef]
42. [42] Remme U, Trudeau N, Graczyk D, Taylor P. Technology development prospects for the Indian power sector. Available at: https://www.iitr.ac.in/wfw/web_ua_water_for_welfare/water/WRDM/IEA-Tech_Dev_Indian_Pow_Sect_2011.pdf. Accessed Aug 7, 2024.
43. [43] Shanmuga Priya S, Migadalska J. Cooling degree day analysis as a climate Impact Indicator for different locations of Poland and India. Int J Adv Sci Engineer Technol 2016;3:42–50.
44. [44] Shanmuga Sundaram A, Bhaskaran A. Optimum insulation thickness of walls for energy-saving in hot regions of India. Int J Sustain Energy 2014;33:213–226. [CrossRef]
45. [45] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2009 ASHRAE handbook — Fundamentals.Available at: https://shop.iccsafe.org/media/wysiwyg/material/8950P217-toc.pdf. Accessed Aug 7, 2024.
46. [46] Cengel Y, Ghajar A. Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: McGraw Hill Inc; 2010.
47. [47] Ministry of Power, Government of India. Energy conservation building code of India 1017. Available at: https://beeindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/BEE_ECBC%202017.pdf. Accessed Aug 7, 2024.