EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF SOLAR FLUX DENSITY DISTRIBUTION OVER FLAT PLATE RECEIVER OF MODEL HELIOSTAT SYSTEM

Year 2020, Volume: 6 Issue: 6 - Special Issue 12: 22nd Thermal Science and Technology Congress, 312 - 322, 01.12.2020

Prakash Gadhe Shivalingappa Sapali Govind Kulkarni

https://doi.org/10.18186/thermal.831343

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The flux density distribution and the temperature of the receiver are important parameters to assess the net thermal energy of any Solar Power Concentrator. In the present work, a heliostat field utilizing ganged type of heliostats for process heating application has been designed. A prototype model of the central receiver system consisting of ganged heliostats has been constructed and installed at Pune, Maharashtra, India. A thermocouple method was used to evaluate the total energy focused by the model heliostat system on a flat receiver. The flux density distribution was validated with the ray tracing simulation software ‘SolTrace’. The simulated flux density distribution was found to be in agreement with the measured one for a surface normal error of 10 milliradian. A heliostat field having 100 m2 total mirror area was designed in the north south cornfield layout. This heliostat field was simulated in ‘SolTrace’ software by considering the surface normal errors as 10 milliradian and the total energy gain was estimated. For the purpose of simulation to investigate the solar flux falling on the receiver, four days of the year were selected. It includes the March equinox, summer solstice, September equinox, and winter solstice.

Keywords

Central Receiver System, Ganged Heliostats, Peak Flux, Average Flux, SolTrace

References

• [1] Geyer M, Stine WB. Power from the Sun (Powerfromthesun.net). JT Lyle Center. 2001. (Accessed 1 April 2013).
• [2] Ballestrín J, Burgess G, Cumpston J. Heat flux and high-temperature measurement technologies for concentrating solar power (CSP). Concentrating solar power technology-developments and applications. Ed. K Lovegrove and W Stein. (Woodhead Publishing, 2012, 3-15).
• [3] King DL, Arvizu DE. Heliostat characterization at the central receiver test facility.
• [4] Strachan JW, Houser RM. Testing and evaluation of large-area heliostats for solar thermal applications. Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (United States); 1993 Feb 1.
• [5] Ulmer S, Reinalter W, Heller P, Lu¨ pfert E, Martinez D. Beam characterization and improvement with a flux mapping system for dish concentrators. InInternational Solar Energy Conference 2002 Jan 1 (Vol. 16893, pp. 285-292).
• [6] Ho CK, Khalsa SS. A flux mapping method for central receiver systems. InEnergy Sustainability 2011 Jan 1 (Vol. 54686, pp. 743-751).
• [7] Xia XL, Dai GL, Shuai Y. Experimental and numerical investigation on solar concentrating characteristics of a sixteen-dish concentrator. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2012 Dec 1;37(24):18694-703.
• [8] Kretzschmar H, Gauche P, Mouzouris M. Development of a flat-plate calorimeter for a small-scale heliostat field. SolarPaces, Marrakech, Morocco. 2012 Sep:11-4.
• [9] Bode S, Gauche P, Landman W. The design and testing of a small scale solar flux measurement system for central receiver plant. InCRSES Annual Student Symposium 2012.
• [10] Bode SJ, Gauché P. Review of optical software for use in concentrating solar power systems. InProceedings of South African Solar Energy Conference 2012 May 21.
• [11] Avila-Marin AL, Fernandez-Reche J, Tellez FM. Evaluation of the potential of central receiver solar power plants: configuration, optimization and trends. Applied energy. 2013 Dec 1;112:274-88.
• [12] Cerecedo LO, Pitalua-Diaz N, Transito IS, Contreras LE, Bulnes CA. Optical performance modeling of a solar tower heliostat field and estimation of receiver temperature. In2013 IEEE International Autumn Meeting on Power Electronics and Computing (ROPEC) 2013 Nov 13 (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
• [13] Kodama T, Gokon N, Matsubara K, Yoshida K, Koikari S, Nagase Y, Nakamura K. Flux measurement of a new beam-down solar concentrating system in Miyazaki for demonstration of thermochemical water splitting reactors. Energy Procedia. 2014 Jan 1;49:1990-8.
• [14] Lee H, Chai K, Kim J, Lee S, Yoon H, Yu C, Kang Y. Optical performance evaluation of a solar furnace by measuring the highly concentrated solar flux. Energy. 2014 Mar 1;66:63-9.
• [15] Sharma VR, Bhosale SJ, Kedare SB, Nayak JK. A simple method to determine optical quality of paraboloid concentrating solar thermal collector. SESI Journal: Journal of the Solar Energy Society of India. 2005 Dec 1;15(2):21.
• [16] Kinjavdekar CA, Muley VP, Kedare SB, Nayak JK. A Test Procedure for Determining Optical characteristics of a Dish Concentrator and its Implementation on Scheffler Dish. SESI Journal. 2010 Dec;20(1):13-23.
• [17] Gadhe P, Ghoti A, Sapali S, Kulkarni G. Experimental Method to Find the Flux and Temperature Distribution on the Flat Receiver of Small Central Receiver System. International Review of Mechanical Engineering (IREME). 2017;11(6):426.
• [18] Johnston G. Flux mapping the 400 m2 “Big Dish” at the Australian National University.
• [19] Maliage M, Roos TH. The flux distribution from a 1.25 m2 target aligned heliostat: comparison of ray tracing and experimental results.
• [20] Yu Q, Wang Z, Xu E, Zhang H, Lu Z, Wei X. Modeling and simulation of 1 MWe solar tower plant’s solar flux distribution on the central cavity receiver. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory. 2012 Dec 1;29:123-36.
• [21] Ali IM, O’Donovan TS, Reddy KS, Mallick TK. An optical analysis of a static 3-D solar concentrator. Solar Energy. 2013 Feb 1;88:57-70.
• [22] Sánchez-González A, Santana D. Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function. Renewable Energy. 2015 Feb 1;74:576-87.
• [23] Pavlovic SR, Stefanovic VP. Ray tracing study of optical characteristics of the solar image in the receiver for a thermal solar parabolic dish collector. Journal of Solar Energy. 2015 Oct 29;2015.
• [24] Venkatesh V, Rao BS, Srilakshmi G, Thirumalai NC, Ramaswamy MA. Correlation between central receiver size and solar field using flat heliostats. Applied Solar Energy. 2017 Jul 1;53(3):258-66.
• [25] Cruz NC, Álvarez JD, Redondo JL, Fernández-Reche J, Berenguel M, Monterreal R, Ortigosa PM. A new methodology for building-up a robust model for heliostat field flux characterization. Energies. 2017 May;10(5):730.
• [26] http://www.nrel.gov/csp/soltrace/download.htm, (Accessed 2 June 2016).
• [27] Hoffmann J. Testing and analysis of low pressure, transparent tube solar receiver for the sunspot cycle. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):1294-307.
• [28] Balotaki HK. Experimental investigation of dual-purpose solar collector using with rectangular channels. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):1052-9.
• [29] Kerme E, Kaneesamkandi Z. Performance analysis and design of liquid based solar heating system. Journal of Thermal Engineering. 2015 Feb 1;1(5):182-91.