Flexural Experiments on B58 Type Railway Sleepers with Different Dosages of Steel Fibers

Abstract

The flexural strengths and toughnesses of 15 post-tensioned B58 type railway sleepers produced at the Turkish State Railroads Sivas Plant using C40 class concrete with addition of hooked steel fibers at dosages of 0, 20, 30, 40, 50 kg/m3 were experimentally determined. Four-point flexural experiments were applied to them in one month after their production and proper curing. Three cylindrical samples of 15×30 cm dimensions taken from the first and the fourth batches apiece were subjected to standard compression tests with compressometer rings mounted on each sample after having been cured in 21 °C water tank for 28 days, resulting in their compressive strength and modulus of elasticity. Modeling a railway sleeper as a post-tensioned reinforced-concrete beam, the maximum load it can resist in the experimented configuration was calculated by the ultimate-strength method using its dimensions and material properties. The experimentally-measured maximum load carried by the reference sleeper without any steel fibers was found to be 1.34 times the theoretically-calculated value, and the same ratio was found to be 1.59 for the sleepers having steel fibers of 40 kg/m3 dosage, accounting for an increase of 18%. And, the experimentally-measured toughness of the sleepers with 40 kg/m3 dosage steel fibers was found to be 23% greater than that of the reference sleepers.

Keywords

• Concrete railway sleepers
• steel fibers
• flexural strength
• toughness

References

1. TSE (1992b) TS 10514 Concrete - Steel Fiber Reinforced - Rules for Mixing Concrete and Control. Turkish Standards Institute, Yücetepe, Ankara, Turkey.
2. ACI (2002) State-of-the-Art Report on Fiber Reinforced Concrete, ACI-544.R-96 (Reapproved 2002), ACI Committee 544, American Concrete Institute,
3. Yazıcı Ş, İnan G, Tabak V (2007) Effect of aspect ratio and volume fraction of steel fiber on the mechanical properties of SFRC. Construction and Building Materials, 21(6), 1250–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.025
4. Altun F and Haktanır T (2004) A comparative experimental investigation of steel fiber added reinforced concrete beams. Materials de Construccion, 54(276), 5–15.
5. Altun F, Haktanır T, Arı K (2006) Experimental investigation of steel fiber reinforced concrete box beams under bending. Materials and Structures, 39(4), 491–499.
6. Haktanır T, Arı K, Altun F, Karahan O (2007) A comparative experimental investigation of concrete, reinforced-concrete, and steel-fiber added concrete pipes under three-edge-bearing test. Construction and Building Materials, 21(8), 1702–1708.
7. TSE (1992a) TS 10513 Steel Fibers for Concrete Reinforcement. Turkish Standards Institute, Yücetepe, Ankara, Turkey.
8. Kasapoğlu E (2010) Effect of Steel-Fiber Usage on Mechanical Properties of Concrete Railway Sleepers. M.Sc. Thesis, Erciyes University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=NGI5wS2idXLccoJNs3Qsnw&no=8HjWjwejK0AfIwmcs1QZPg

9. Weisheit S and Metzler G (2014) Entwicklung einer rissfreien Bahnschwelle durch den Einsatz eines kombifaserbewehrten Hochfesten Betons - KOMBIFASERBETON -. Universität Innsbruck Fakultät für Technische Wissenschaften Institut für Konstruktion und Materialwissenschaften Arbeitsbereich Materialtechnologie, Wien, Österreich.
10. Sadeghi J, Kian A R T, Khabbazi A S (2016) Improvement of Mechanical Properties of Railway Track Concrete Sleepers Using Steel Fibers. Journal of Materials Engineering, ASCE, 28(11), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001646
11. Parvez A and Foster S J (2017) Fatigue of steel-fibre-reinforced concrete prestressed railway sleepers. Engineering Structures, 141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.025
12. Bae Y and Pyo S (2020) Effect of steel fiber content on structural and electrical properties of ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) sleepers. Engineering Structures, 222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111131
13. Wang J, Siahkouhi M, Astaraki F, Uuganbayar S, Jing G, Rad M M (2022) Modification of Concrete Railway Sleeper Mix Design, Using a Hybrid Application of Steel Fibers. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 19(3), 119–130.
14. Ahmed S, Atef H, Husain M (2023) Experimental and parametrical investigation of pre-stressed ultrahigh-performance fiber-reinforced concrete railway sleepers. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 17(3): 411-428. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-023-0928-3
15. Çeçen F and Aktaş B (2021a) Modal and harmonic response analysis of new cfrp laminate reinforced concrete railway sleepers. Engineering Failure Analysis, 127, no 105471, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105471
16. Çeçen F and Aktaş B (2021b) Incremental LUR tests of new LCR concrete railway sleepers. Engineering Failure Analysis, 130, no 105793, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105793
17. Aktaş B, Çeçen F, Öztürk H, Navdar M B, Öztürk İ Ş (2022) Comparison of prestressed concrete railway sleepers and new LCR concrete sleepers with experimental modal analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 131, no 105821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105821
18. Çeçen F, Aktaş B, Öztürk H, Navdar M B, Öztürk İ Ş (2022a) Behaviour of new LCR and ordinary prestressed concrete railway sleepers under repeated impact loads. Construction and Building Materials, 319, no. 126151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126151
19. Çeçen F, Aktaş B, Öztürk H, Öztürk İ Ş, Navdar M B (2022b) Comparison of new LCR and ordinary prestressed concrete railway sleepers with LUR tests. Construction and Building Materials, 321, no. 126414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126414
20. Çeçen F, Aktaş B, Öztürk H, Öztürk İ Ş, Navdar M B (2022c) Comparative modal analysis of B70 and LCR-6 type railway sleepers after repeated impact loads. Construction and Building Materials, 336, no. 127563, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127563
21. Çeçen F, Aktaş B, Öztürk H, Öztürk İ Ş, Navdar M B (2022d) Comparative Investigation of Carbon-Fiber Laminate Reinforced Sleepers with B70-Type Prestressed Concrete Sleepers (In Turkish). Railway Engineering, 15, 97–110, doi: 10.47072/demiryolu.1028740
22. Çankaya M A and Akan Ç (2023) An Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Bending Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, Paper 717, 34(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1209152
23. Türker K, Birol T, Yavaş A, Hasgül U, Yazıcı H (2019) Flexural Behavior of Beams with Ultra High Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete (In Turkish). Teknik Dergi, Paper 523, 30(1), 8777–8801,
24. TCDD (2023) 2022 Annual Report (Bilingual in Turkish and in English). General Directorate of Turkish State Railways, Directorate of Strategic Planning. Ankara, Türkiye.
25. TSE (2016) TS EN 13230-2 Railway applications; Track - Concrete sleepers and bearers – Part 2: Prestressed monoblock sleepers. Turkish Standards Institute, Yücetepe, Ankara, Türkiye.
26. TSE (1979) TS 3233 Building Code Requirements for Prestressed Concrete. Turkish Standards Institute, Yücetepe, Ankara, Turkey.
27. Cleven S, Roupach M, Matschei T (2021) Electrical Resistivity of Steel Fibre-Reinforced Concrete-Influencing Parameters. Materials, 14, 3408, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123408