Türk yaylarının yapımında kullanılan geleneksel ve yeni nesil tutkalların yapışma performanslarının karşılaştırılması

Abstract

İlkel toplumlardan günümüz modern ordularına kadar insanoğlu varoluşundan beri rekabet ve savaş halinde olmuş, bu mücadeleyi kazanmak için farklı silah sistemleri geliştirmiştir. İlk kullanılan ve geliştirilen silahlardan olan ok ve yayın ilk kez ne zaman, nerede kullanıldığı belli değildir fakat savaşlarda en etkili silahlardan biri olmuştur. Bütün kültürlerde ok ve yay kullanılmasına rağmen geliştirilmesi ve kompozit yay formunu alması göçebe Orta Asya kültürlerinde olmuştur. Kompozit yayın imalinde ana bileşenlerin en önemlisi olan hayvansal tutkalların işlevini vurgulamak gerekir. Ahşap, boynuz ve hayvan tendonlarından oluşan malzemeleri güçlü bir şekilde bir arada tutan tutkalların imali ve kullanımı kompozit yayların yapımını mümkün kılmıştır. Bu makalede yay yapımında kullanılan geleneksel tutkallar ile yeni nesil tutkalların yapışma performansları çekme testi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada Tatar akçaağacından (Acer tataricum L.) hazırlanan ahşap yapışma örnekleri 10 farklı tutkalla 5 bar basınç altında sıcaklık uygulanmadan yapıştırılıp hazırlanmıştır. Çekme testlerinde elde edilen verilere göre en yüksek yapışma mukavemeti deri tutkalından elde edilmiştir. Hayvansal tutkalların kimyasal yapıları, yapısında bulunan fonksiyonel gruplar ve faklılıkları FTIR analizi ile incelenmiştir. Elde edilen spektruma göre hayvansal proteinler için karakteristik pikler belirlenmiştir. Ancak farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen örneklerin amid pik şiddeti farklılıkları ve dalga boyu kaymaları ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca lap shear yapışma testi örneklerinin yapışma hattı ışık mikroskobu altında tutkal penetrasyonu ve ahşap tutkal etkileşimi açısından incelenmiştir.

Keywords

• Yay
• Protein tutkalı
• FTIR
• Yapışma performansı

Comparison of the adhesion performances of traditional and new generation adhesives used in the making of Turkish bows

Abstract

From primitive societies to today's modern armies, mankind has engaged in competition and warfare since its existence, developing various weapon systems for prevailing in these conflicts. Although it remains unclear when and where the bow and arrow, among the earliest weapons used and developed, were first employed, they have consistently been one of the most effective war instruments. The development of bows and arrows, particularly the transition to composite bows, is notably associated with nomadic Central Asian cultures. It is crucial to highlight the significance of animal adhesives, which are pivotal components in the production of composite bows. The utilization of adhesives to bind materials such as wood, horn, and animal tendons facilitated the creation of composite bows. This article compares the adhesion performances of traditional animal protein-based adhesives used in bow production and new-generation commercial adhesives with the tensile test. Tatar maple (Acer tataricum L.) wood adhesion samples were employed in the study, bonded with ten different adhesives under 5-bar pressure without applying heat. The tensile test results indicate that hide glue has the highest adhesion strength. The chemical structures of animal adhesives, the functional groups within the structure, and their variations were analyzed through FTIR analysis. Characteristic peaks for animal proteins were identified in accordance with the obtained spectrum. Furthermore, differences in amide peak intensities and wavelength shifts were detected among samples obtained from various sources. Additionally, the adhesion line of the lap shear adhesion test samples was examined under a light microscope to assess adhesive penetration and the interaction between wood and adhesive.

Keywords

• Bow
• Protein adhesive
• FTIR
• Adhesion performance

References

1. Adams, R.D., Wake, W.C., 1986. Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers London and New York.
2. Alfaro, A.T., Balbinot, E., Weber, C.I., Tonial, I.B., Lunkes, A.M., 2014. Fish Gelatin: Characteristics, Functional Properties, Applications and Future Potentials. Food Eng Rev DOI 10.1007/s12393-014-9096-5.
3. Allely, S., Baker, T., Comstock, P., Hamm, J., HardcastleR., Massey J., Strunk, J., 1992. The Traditional Bowyer’s Bible, Volume one. The Lyons Press Guilford, Connecticut Canada.
4. Asbell, G.F., Baker, T., Comstock, P., Grayson, B., Hamm, J., Herrin, A., Massey, J., Parker, G., 1993. The Traditional Bowyer’s Bible, Volume two. The Lyon S Pres S Guılford, Connectıcut Canada.
5. Balogh, C., 2016. Karpat Havzası’nda bir Avar yay ustasının mezar kalıntıları Eski Türklerde bileşik (Kompozit) yay yapımına ilişkin arkeolojik bulgular. Art-Sanat 6: 109-120.
6. Baty, A.M., Suci, P.A., Tyler, B.J., Geesey, G.G., 1996. Investigation of mussel adhesive protein adsorption on polystyrene and poly (octadecyl methacrylate) using angle dependent XPS, ATR-FTIR, and AFM. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 177(2), 307-315.
7. Bergman, S., 2011. Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material. Forest Product Society. USA.
8. Bir, A., Kaçar, M., Acar, Ş., 2006. Türk Menzil Okçuluğu, Yay ve Okları. Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları VIII/1: 40-67. Bridarolli, A., Freeman, A.A., Fujisawa, N., Łukomski, M., 2022. Mechanical properties of mammalian and fish glues over range of temperature and humidity, Journal of Cultural Heritage, Volume 53, Pages 226-235, ISSN 1296-2074, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2021.12.005.

9. BS 1204:1993. Specification for type MR phenolic and aminoplastic synthetic resin adhesives for wood.
10. Claussen, K.U., Lintz, E.S., Giesa, R., Schmidt, H. W., Scheibel, T., 2013. Protein gradient films of fibroin and gelatine. Macromolecular Bioscience, 13(10), 1396-1403.
11. Çetin, A., 2011. Memlûk Devletinde Okçuluk. Gazi Türkiyat, 1 (9), 67-86 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gaziturkiyat/issue/6722/90347.
12. Dillard, D.A., 2010. Advences in Structural Adhesive Bonding. Woodhead Publishing Limited CRC Press, Washington p 643.
13. Doğan, A., 2017. Osmanlıda Kemankeşlik (Okçuluk) ve Ahilik Ritüelleri. Doktora Tezi, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Anabilim Dalı. Samsun.
14. Eralp, T.N., 1993. Tarih Boyunca Türk Toplumunda Sîlâh Kavramı ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğunda Kullanılan Silâhlar. Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarîh Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Kültür Merkezî Yayını-Sayı: 68. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi-Ankara.
15. Fant, C., Hedlund, J., Höök, F., Berglin, M., Fridell, E., Elwing, H., 2010. Investigation of adsorption and cross-linking of a mussel adhesive protein using attenuated total internal reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR). The Journal of Adhesion, 86(1), 25-38.
16. Farhat, I.A., Orset, S., Moreau, P., Blanshard, J.M., 1998. FTIR study of hydration phenomena in protein–sugar systems. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 207(2), 200-208.
17. Frihart, C.R., Hunt, C.G., 2011. Adhesives with Wood Materials Bond Formation and Performance Chapter 10- (10-24) (Bergman, S., 2011. Wood Handbook, Wood as an Engineering Material. Forest Product Society. USA).
18. Gerhard, G., Karmann, W., 2001. Adhesives and Adhesive Tapes. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69469 Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany.
19. Göksu, E., 2013. Okla Yükselen Millet (Türklerde ok ve okçuluk). Okçular Vakfı yayınları. Alioğlu Matbaacılık Basım Yay. ve Kağ. San. Tic. Ltd. Şti. İstanbul
20. Grayson, C.E., French, M., O’Brien, M.J, 2007. Traditional Archery From Six Continents. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri.
21. Gündüz, G., Yaman, B., Özden, S., Dönmez, S.C., 2013. Anatomy of wooden core of Ottoman composite archery bows. Sains Malaysiana 42(5)(2013): 547–552.
22. Habenicht, G., 2009. Applied Adhesive Bonding a Practical Guide for Flawless Results. Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim ISBN: 978-3-527-32014-1.
23. Harrison, S.M., Kaml, I., Prokoratova, V., Mazanek, M., Kenndler, E., 2005. Animal glues in mixtures of natural binding media used in artistic and historic objects: identification by capillary zone electrophoresis. Anal Bioanal Chem 382: 1520–1526 DOI 10.1007/s00216-005-3319-9.
24. Haupt, M., Dyer, D., Hanlan, J., 1990. An investigation into three animal glues, The Conservator, 14:1, 10-16, DOI: 10.1080/01410096.1990.9995051.
25. İrtem, S.K., 1939. Sultan II. Mahmud Devri Türk Kemankeşleri. (Hazırlayan: Kocahanoğlu, O.S., 2005. Bayrak Matbaacılık Ltd. İstanbul.
26. Kaewprachu, P., Osako, K., Benjakul, S., Tongdeesoontorn, W., Rawdkuen, S., 2016. Biodegradable protein‐based films and their properties: a comparative study. Packaging Technology and Science, 29(2), 77-90.
27. Kani, M., 1847. Telhis-i Resailü’r- Rumat, s. 159-160, İstanbul (Matbaa-iAmire) 1263 (Çeviren, Yavuz, K.,Canatar, M., 2010. Okçuluk Kitabı Telhis-İ Resailat-I Rumat). İstanbul Fetih Cemiyeti İstanbul.
28. Karpowicz, A., 2008. Ottoman Turkish Bows: Manufacture and Design. Ottawa: Canada Cataloguing.
29. Khiari, Z., Rico, D., Martin-Diana, A.B., Barry-Ryan, C., 2011. The extraction of gelatine from mackerel (Scomber scombrus) heads with the use of different organic acids. Journal of Fisheries Sciences. com, 5(1), 52.
30. Klopsteg, P., 1987. Turkish Archery and the Composite Bow. Manchester: Simon Archery Foundation, The Manchester Museum.
31. Klopsteg, P.E., 1934. Turkish Archery and the Composite Bow. Printed and bound in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner Ltd, Frome and London.
32. Knecht, H., 1997. Projectile Technology. Chapter 6 Sinew-Reinforced and Composite Bows Technology, Function, and Social Implications Christopher A. Bergman And Edward Mcewen 143-160. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
33. Kooi, B.W., 1994. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen 97(3): 1–27.
34. Kumar, R.N., Pizzi, A., 2019. Adhesives for Wood and Lignocellulosic Materials. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA Scrivener Publishing LLC.
35. Küçük, M.A., 2018. İslâm Öncesinden Sonrasına Türk Geleneğinde Bir Yaşam Stili:“Okçuluk. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies (IntJCSS) June 2018: Volume 4 (Issue 1) e-ISSN : 2458-9381.
36. Latham, J.D., Paterson, W.F. 1970. Saracen Archery. Latham Publisher: The Holland Press, London, ISBN: 0900470046.
37. Loades, M., 2016. The Composite Bow. Osprey Publishing Ltd. USA.
38. Lucas, F.M. da Silva, Dillard D.A., Blackman, B., Adams, R.D., 2012. Testing Adhesive Joints Best Practices. Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany.
39. Melià-Angulo, L. Fuster-López and A.Vicente- Escuder., 2016. Study of the mechanical properties of selected animal glues and their implication when designing conservation strategies. Education and Research in Conservation-Restoration European Network for Conservation-Restoration Education - Symposium 15-16 April 2016. https://doi.org/10.4000/ceroart.5152.
40. Metin, T., 2014. Selçuklularda okçuluğa genel bir bakış. Tarih Okulu Dergisi (TOD) Journal of History School (JOHS) Yıl 7, Sayı XVII, ss. 131-153. Year 7, Issue XVII, pp. 131-153. DOI No: http://dx.doi.org/10.14225/Joh457.
41. Mikhail, B., 2009. Adhesive Bonding Materials, Applications and Technology WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
42. Mittal, K.L., Panigrahi, S.K., 2020. Structural Adhesive Joints Design, Analysis and Testing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA.
43. Oliver, J.F., 1981. Adhesion in Cellulosic and Wood-Based Composites. Published in cooperation with NATO Scientific Affairs Division Plenum Press· New York And London, 1981. Plenum Press, New York.
44. Parlak, S., 2020. Türk yaylarında kullanılan ağaç türleri ve özellikleri. Ağaç ve Orman, 1(2) 25-34.
45. Petrie, E.M., 2006. Epoxy Adhesive Formulations. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
46. Petrie, E.M., 2007. Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
47. Pizzi, A., 1994. Advanced Wood Adhesives Technology. CRC Press.
48. Pizzi, A., Mittal, K.L., 2003. Chap. 28. In: Pizzi, A., Ed., Handbook of Adhesive Technology, 2nd Edition, Marcel Dekker, New York.
49. Randall, K.C., 2016. Origins and Comparative Performance of the Composite Bow. Phd. Thesis, University of South Africa pp 289.
50. Saraswathy, G., Pal, S., Rose, C., Sastry, T.P., 2001. A novel bio-inorganic bone implant containing deglued bone, chitosan and gelatin. Bulletin of Materials Science, 24, 415-420.
51. Schellmann, N., 2009. Animal Glues – Their adhesive properties, longevity and suggested use for repairing taxidermy specimens NatSCA News, Issue 16, 36-40.
52. Schellmann, N.C., 2007. Animal glues: A review of their key properties relevant to conservation. Studies in Conservation, 8, 55-66.
53. Tousi, E.T., Hashim, R.,Bauk, S.,Jaafar, M.S.,Al-Jarrah, A.M.,Kardani, H.,Abu Arra, A.M.H.,and Aldroob, K.S.A., 2014. A Study of the properties of animal based wood glue. Advanced Materials Research Vol. 935 pp 133-137 (2014) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.935.133.
54. Wilkinson, K.A., Ordonez, D.A., 2011. Adhesive Properties in Nanomaterials, Composites and Films. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
55. Yücel, Ü., 1999. Türk Okçuluğu, Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Başkanlığı Yayınları, Ankara.