Farklı orman habitatlarında alfa (α), beta (β) ve gama (ɣ) biyoçeşitliliği üzerine metrik olmayan çok boyutlu ölçeklendirme analizi örneği

Abstract

Doğal ekosistemlerin etkin korunabilmesi için biyoçeşitliliği yöneten ekolojik inceliklerin anlaşılması önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışma, ormanlar, nehirler ve turistik alanlar gibi farklı orman habitatlarının ağaçlar, kuşlar, memeliler, sürüngenler ve omurgasızlar arasındaki biyolojik çeşitlilik üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Saha verileri, ağaçlar için kuadrat örnekleme, kuşlar için dairesel şerit transektler ve memeliler ve sürüngenler için canlı yakalama gibi çeşitli yöntemler kullanılarak 90 parselden toplanmıştır. Biyoçeşitlilik endeksleri (alfa, beta, gama) R programlama ortamı kullanılarak vegan ve iNEXT paketleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, habitatlar arasında tür zenginliği ve kompozisyonunda önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ormanlar, ağaçlar için 86, kuşlar için 104 ve memeliler için 46 değerleriyle yüksek alfa çeşitlilik endeksleri sergilemiştir. Nehirle ilişkili ormanlar, özellikle omurgasızlar için kayda değer beta çeşitliliği ile birlikte artan tür zenginliği göstermiştir. Buna karşılık, turistik alanlar, ağaçlar ve omurgasızlar için tür zenginliğinde azalma ve biraz daha düşük alfa çeşitliliği indeksleri göstermiştir. Shannon çeşitlilik endeksi ağaçlar için en yüksek (3.60) ve omurgasızlar için en düşük (1.00) değerde olup, turistik bölgelerdeki insan faaliyetlerinin olumsuz etkisini vurgulamaktadır. Habitatlar arasındaki tür dağılımlarında önemli bir varyasyon olduğunu doğrulamış, seyrekleşme eğrileri ise en yüksek zenginliğin ormanlarda olduğunu göstermiştir. . Çalışma ayrıca ağaçlandırma ve kaçak avcılıkla mücadele faaliyetleri gibi koruma çabalarını biyoçeşitlilikteki iyileşmelerle ilişkilendirmiştir. Öneriler arasında yüksek biyoçeşitliliğe sahip alanların korunmasına öncelik verilmesi, habitat restorasyonu, sürekli izleme, halk eğitimi ve çevre politikalarının sıkı bir şekilde uygulanması yer almaktadır. Bu stratejiler biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması ve ekolojik bütünlüğün sürdürülmesi için elzemdir. Bulgular, habitat türleri ve biyoçeşitlilik arasındaki ilişkiye dair kritik bilgiler sunarak etkili koruma ve yönetim uygulamalarını desteklemektedir.

Keywords

• Biyoçeşitlilik
• iNEXT
• Kaptai Milli Parkı
• Orman ekolojisi
• NMDS
• Seyreltme

A case of non-metric multidimensional scaling of alpha (α), beta (β) and gamma (ɣ) biological diversity across the diverse forest habitats

Abstract

The ecological intricacies that govern biodiversity is an essential understanding for the effective conservation of natural ecosystems. The study examines the impact of different forest habitats i.e. forests, rivers, and tourist areas on biodiversity across trees, birds, mammals, reptiles, and invertebrates. Field data were collected from 90 plots using various methods, such as quadrat sampling for trees, circular strip transects for aves, and live trapping for mammals and reptiles. Biodiversity indices (alpha, beta, gamma) were analyzed using the R programming environment, employing the vegan and iNEXT packages. Results revealed significant differences in species richness and composition among habitats. Forests exhibited high alpha diversity indices, with values of 86 for trees, 104 for aves, and 46 for mammals. River-associated forests showed increased species richness and evenness, with notable beta diversity, especially for invertebrates. Conversely, tourist areas displayed reduced species richness and slightly lower alpha diversity indices for trees and invertebrates. The Shannon diversity index was highest for trees (3.60) and lowest for invertebrates (1.00), highlighting the negative impact of human activities in tourist areas. Games-Howell tests and NMDS confirmed significant variation in species distributions between habitats, with rarefaction curves indicating the highest richness in forests. The study also linked conservation efforts, such as reforestation and anti-poaching activities, to improvements in biodiversity. Recommendations include prioritizing the protection of high-biodiversity areas, habitat restoration, ongoing monitoring, public education, and strict enforcement of environmental policies. These strategies are essential for enhancing biodiversity conservation and maintaining ecological integrity. The findings provide critical insights into the relationship between habitat types and biodiversity, supporting effective conservation and management practices.

Keywords

• Biodiversity
• iNEXT
• Kaptai National Park
• Forest ecology
• NMDS
• Rarefaction

Supporting Institution

Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chattogram-4331, Bangladesh

Ethical Statement

This paper's research was carried out in accordance with ethical guidelines. The institutional and national guidelines for biodiversity research were followed in all fieldwork operations. Minimal disruption to the ecosystems and species surveyed was guaranteed by the study. No endangered species were damaged in the course of the study, and all necessary permits for data collection were obtained from the appropriate authorities. Ethical principles were followed in the collection and analysis of the data to guarantee openness, honesty, and environmental respect.

Thanks

The authors are thankful to the Chittagong Hill Tracts Forest Division for their necessary support to conduct the field-works in Kaptai National Park.

References

1. Abdullah, M. R., Rahman, M., Sarwar, A. K. M. G., 2018. Threatened plants in Kaptai National Park in Rangamati, Bangladesh. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology, 5(2018). doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108150
2. Abdullah, M. R., Sarwar, A. G., Rahman, M. M., 2022. Threatened vascular plants of Karnaphuli Range under Kaptai Reserve Forest of Rangamati, Bangladesh. Plant Physiology and Soil Chemistry, 2(2), 97–101.
3. Ahsan, M. F., Al Haidar, I. K., 2017. A comparative study of avian diversity in Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary, Inani Reserve Forest and Chittagong University campus in Bangladesh. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 9(5), 10158–10170.
4. Alam, M., Rahman, M. R., Chowdhury, M. A., Alam, M. S., 2019. Community dependency and conservation practices in Khagrachari, Bangladesh: A study on management of Village Common Forests (VCFs). Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, September, 1–13.
5. Bredemeier, M., Dennis, P., Sauberer, N., Petriccione, B., Török, K., Cocciufa, C., Morabito, G., Pugnetti, A., 2007. Biodiversity assessment and change - The challenge of appropriate methods. In Issues in Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 25, Issue July).
6. Brockerhoff, E. G., Barbaro, L., Castagneyrol, B., Forrester, D. I., Gardiner, B., González-Olabarria, J. R., Lyver, P. O. B., Meurisse, N., Oxbrough, A., Taki, H., Thompson, I. D., van der Plas, F., Jactel, H., 2017. Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(13), 3005–3035.
7. Chakraborty, A., Barman, H., Saha, G. K., Aditya, G., 2021. Wintering waterbird assemblage in an emerging wetland of West Bengal, India: Characterization for conservation management. Ornis Hungarica, 29(1), 1–19.
8. Chowdhury, B., Hossain, M. K., Hossain, M. A., Khan, B. M., 2018. Native tree species diversity of Rampahar Natural Forest Reserve in Rangamati South Forest Division, Bangladesh. Ceylon Journal of Science, 47(2), 129.

9. Chowdhury, M. A., Islam, K. N., Hafiz, N., Islam, K., 2019. Diversity of trees in a community managed forest: the case of Komolchori VCF, Khagrachari, Bangladesh. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes, 3(2), 95–103.
10. Colwell, R. K., 2009. Biodiversity: Concepts, Patterns, and Measurement. In Princeton University Press eBooks (pp. 257-263).
11. Das, A., Sharma, P., Surendran, H., Nath, A., Ghosh, S., Dutta, D., Mondol, J., Wangdi, Y., 2016. Additions to the herpetofauna of Royal Manas National Park, Bhutan, with six new country records. Herpetology Notes, 9 (November), 261–278.
12. de Souza Valente, C., Rodiles, A., Freire Marques, M. R., Merrifield, D. L., 2020. White spot syndrome virus (WSSV) disturbs the intestinal microbiota of shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) reared in biofloc and clear seawater. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 104(18), 8007–8023.
13. Dutta, S., Hossain, M. K., 2016. Infestation of Imperata cylindrica L. and its impacts on local communities in secondary forests of sitakunda botanical garden and eco-park, chittagong, Bangladesh. International Journal of Conservation Science, 7(1), 167–180.
14. Dutta, S., Mk, H., M, A. H., Chowdhury, P., 2015. Exotic plants and their usage by local communities in the Sitakunda. Forest Research, 4(1), 1–9.
15. Głowacka, A., Flis-Olszewska, E., 2022. The biodiversity of weed communities of dent maize, narrow-leaved lupin and oat in relation to cropping system and weed control. Agronomy Science, 77(3), 123–137.
16. Hasan, M., Jorin, T., Sayok, A. K., 2023. Biodiversity information systems in geospatial applications for protected area management. American Journal of Geographic Information System 12(1), 1-27.
17. Hasan, M., Kabi, J., Nazrul, K., Miah, M. R., Parisha, J. T., Alam, S.-E., Sayok, A. K., Sarok, A., Uddin, M. B., 2023. Enhancing National Park information knowledge to improve biodiversity conservation in Bangladesh: A Study on Policy Perspectives. International Journal of Plant Research, 2023(1), 1–23.
18. Karl, H. V., Safi, A., Tichy, G. , 2024. Review of fossil records of prehistoric reptiles, their distribution, and paleobiogeographic evolution in Pakistan, Scientific Reports in Life Sciences 5(3), 1-23.
19. Kessler, M., Abrahamczyk, S., Bos, M., Buchori, D., Putra, D. D., Gradstein, S. R., Höhn, P., Kluge, J., Orend, F., Pitopang, R., Saleh, S., Schulze, C. H., Sporn, S. G., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tjitrosoedirdjo, S. S., Tscharntke, T. 2009. Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land-use gradient. Ecological Applications, 19(8), 2142–2156.
20. Liu, G., Bou, G., Su, S., Xing, J., Qu, H., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Zhao, Y., Dugarjaviin, M., 2019. Microbial diversity within the digestive tract contents of Dezhou donkeys. PLoS ONE, 14(12), 1–14.
21. Majumdar, K., Shankar, U., Datta, B. K., 2014. Trends in Tree Diversity and Stand Structure during Restoration: A Case Study in Fragmented Moist Deciduous Forest Ecosystems of Northeast India. Journal of Ecosystems, 2014, 1–10.
22. Magurran, A. E., 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurements. Princeton Univsity Pres, Princeton, NJ. doi: 10.1007/ 978-94-015-7358-0
23. Mandl, N., Lehnert, M., Kessler, M., Gradstein, S. R., 2010. A comparison of alpha and beta diversity patterns of ferns, bryophytes and macrolichens in tropical montane forests of southern Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(8), 2359–2369.
24. Miah, R., Hasan, M., Parisha, J. T., Sayok, A. K., 2023. A framework on biodiversity conservation related policy analysis. January.
25. Mohd-Taib, F. S., Mohd-Saleh, W., Asyikha, R., Mansor, M. S., Ahmad-Mustapha, M., Mustafa-Bakray, N. A., Mod-Husin, S., Md-Shukor, A., Amat-Darbis, N. D., Sulaiman, N., 2020. Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on the species assemblages of birds in the back mangrove forests. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 28(3), 479–494.
26. Mahata, R., Panta, M., Ghimire, S., 2024. Assessing the impact of climate change on Ophiocardyceps sinensis, Agarcus bisporu, Fritillaria cirrhosu, and Paris polyphylla in Nepal. Scientific Reports in Life Sciences, 5(2), 18–37.
27. Nolan, K., Callan, J., 2006. Beachcomber Biology : The Shannon-Weiner Species Diversity Index. ABLE 2005 Proceedings, 27, 334–338.
28. Pozo, P., Säumel, I., 2018. How to bloom the green desert: Eucalyptus plantations and native forests in uruguay beyond black and white perspectives. Forests, 9(10), 614.
29. Pielou, E. C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131-144.
30. Rahman, M. H., Khan, M. A. S. A., Roy, B., Fardusi, M. J., 2011. Assessment of natural regeneration status and diversity of tree species in the biodiversity conservation areas of Northeastern Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 22(4), 551–559.
31. Rahman, M. H., Roy, B., Anik, S. I., Fardusi, M. J., 2013. Ecotourism and protected area conservation in Bangladesh: a case study on understanding the visitors views on prospects and development. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science, 29(1), 15–28.
32. Rahman, M. M., Mahmud, M. A. Al, Shahidullah, M., Nath, T. K., Jashimuddin, M., 2016. The competitiveness of the phytosociological attributes of the protected areas in Bangladesh with that in the other tropical countries. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(6), 431–450.
33. Rahman, M. M., Al Mahmud, M. A., Ahmed, F. U., Deb, R., 2017a. Developing alternative income generation activities reduces forest dependency of the poor and enhances their livelihoods: The case of the chunati wildlife sanctuary, Bangladesh. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 26(4), 256–270.
34. Rahman, M. M., Mahmud, M. A. A., Shahidullah, M., 2017b. Socioeconomics of biodiversity conservation in the protected areas: a case study in Bangladesh. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 24(1), 65–72.
35. Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Huda, M. K., 2020. Tree species diversity of the Kaptai National Park in Rangamati district, Bangladesh. Jahangirnagar University Journal of Biological Sciences, 8(2), 71–79.
36. Reza, A., 2010. Colubrid Snake Lycodon zawi (Serpentes: Colubridae) from Lawachara National Park in Bangladesh. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 17(1), 75–77.
37. Reza, A. H. M. A., Perry, G., 2015. Herpetofaunal species richness in the tropical forests of Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, 4(2), 59.
38. Roy, S., Bhattacharya, K. R., 2023. A New Biodiversity Index and the Corresponding Index of Evenness : A Simple Theoretical Analysis. 4(3), 445–453.
39. Scherer, L., De Laurentiis, V., Marques, A., Michelsen, O., Alejandre, E. M., Pfister, S., Rosa, F., Rugani, B., 2021. Linking land use inventories to biodiversity impact assessment methods. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(12), 2315–2320.
40. Scherer, L., Rosa, F., Sun, Z., Michelsen, O., De Laurentiis, V., Marques, A., Pfister, S., Verones, F., Kuipers, K. J. J. 2023. Biodiversity impact assessment considering land use intensities and fragmentation. Environmental Science and Technology, 57(48), 19612–19623. Sharashy, O. S., 2022. Plant biodiversity on coastal rocky ridges habitats with reference to census data in Ras El-Hekma and Omayed Area, Egypt. Sebha University Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, 21(1), 41–45.
41. Simpson, E., 1949. Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
42. Smith, J., Bass, S., Roe, D., 2020. Biodiversity mainstreaming: a review of current theory and practice. IIED, London, December, 1–56.
43. Uddin, M., Chowdhury, F. I., Hossain, M. K. 2020a. Assessment of tree species diversity, composition and structure of Medha Kachhapia National Park, Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Forestry, 4(1), 15–21.
44. Uddin, M. N., Hossain, M. M., Karim, M. S., Siriwong, W., Boonyanuphap, J., 2020b. The phytosociological attributes of village common forests in Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 42(4), 819–829.
45. Xu, Z., Hansen, M. A., Hansen, L. H., Jacquiod, S., Sørensen, S. J., 2014. Bioinformatic approaches reveal metagenomic characterization of soil microbial community. PLoS ONE, 9(4).
46. Yousefiard, K., Naderi, M., Ansari, A., Kazemi, A., 2024. Evaluation of the effects of oak forest changes on Persian Squirrel (Sciurus anomalus) habitat selection. Scientific Reports in Life Sciences, 5(3), 37–47.